How cited: Oman v. Indiana · Go Syfert

Oman v. Indiana (2001)

green · 47 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Trigalet v. City of Tulsa, 239 F.3d 1150, 1154-55 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 814 , 122 S.Ct. 40 , 151 L.Ed.2d 13 (2001); Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567 , 579 n. 9 (4th Cir.2001); Evans v. Avery, 100 F.3d 1033, 1040 (1st Cir.1996); Thompson v. Boggs, 33 F.3d 847 , 859 n. 11 (7th Cir.1994).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See Trigalet v. City of Tulsa, 239 F.3d 1150, 1154-55 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 814 , 122 S.Ct. 40 , 151 L.Ed.2d 13 (2001); Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567 , 579 n. 9 (4th Cir.2001); Evans v. Avery, 100 F.3d 1033, 1040 (1st Cir.1996); Thompson v. Boggs, 33 F.3d 847 , 859 n. 11 (7th Cir.1994).
green Richardson v. State (2006)
Cited · Ind. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Oman v. State, 737 N.E.2d 1131, 1149 (Ind.2000), reh'g denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 814 , 122 S.Ct. 38 , 151 L.Ed.2d 12 (2001). [5] Ind.Code § 35-48-4-11(2). [6] Ind.Code § 35-48-4-14.5(c). [7] Ind.Code § 35-48-4-8.3(c). [8] Ind.Code § 35-48-4-13(b)(2)(D). [9] Ind.Code § 22-11-20-6(b)(1). [10] Ind.Code § 35-48-4-6(a). [11] In California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 39 , 108 S.Ct. 1625 , 100 L.Ed.2d 30 (1988), the United States Supreme Court upheld the warrantless search …
green State v. Eichhorst (2008)
Cited · Ind. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Oman v. State, 737 N.E.2d 1131, 1138 (Ind.2000), reh’g denied, cert. denied, 534 U.S. 814 , 122 S.Ct. 38 , 151 L.Ed.2d 12 (2001) (holding that, in the future, “[a] prosecutor acting without a grand jury must first seek leave of court before issuing a subpoena duces tecum to a third party for the production of documentary evidence”).
holding that, in the future, “[a] prosecutor acting without a grand jury must first seek leave of court before issuing a subpoena duces tecum to a third party for the production of documentary evidence”
Cited (see also) · S.D. Tex. · signal: see also
A plaintiff must demonstrate recklessness with “sufficient evidence to permit the conclusion that the defendant in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of his publication.” Id. (“necessity for showing that a false publication was made with a ‘high degree of awareness of probable falsity’ ”); see also Church of Scientology Int’l v. Behar, 238 F.3d 168 , 174 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 814 , 122 S.Ct. 40 , 151 L.Ed.2d 13 (2001); Scalamandre & Sons v. Kaufm…