Hart v. United States (2002)
green
· 44 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200220142026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Sanders v. State (2010)
See Miles v. State, 365 Md. 488, 554 , 781 A.2d 787 (2001) (defendant not “ ‘allowed to assert one position at trial and another, inconsistent position on appeal’ ”) (quoting Burch v. State, 346 Md. 253, 289 , 696 A.2d 443 (1997)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1163 , 122 S.Ct. 1175 , 152 L.Ed.2d 118 (2002); Chimes v. Michael, 131 Md.App. 271, 288 , 748 A.2d 1065 (Rule 8-131(a) “curbs appeals that are inconsistent with the parties’ positions at trial.”), cert. denied, 359 Md. 334 ,…
green
Garza v. Thaler (2012)
See Martinez v. Johnson, 255 F.3d 229 , 241 n. 17 (5th Cir.2001) (recognizing there is no constitutional right to proportionality review), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1163 , 122 S.Ct. 1175 , 152 L.Ed.2d 118 (2002); Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 622 (5th Cir.1999) (holding a state appellate court was not required to conduct proportionality review of a capital sentence), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1145 , 120 S.Ct. 1003 , 145 L.Ed.2d 945 (2000); United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 30…
green
Jasper v. Thaler (2011)
See Martinez v. Johnson, 255 F.3d 229 , 241 n. 17 (5th Cir.2001) (recognizing there is no constitutional right to proportionality review), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1163 , 122 S.Ct. 1175 , 152 L.Ed.2d 118 (2002); Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 622 (5th Cir.1999) (holding a state appellate court was not required to conduct proportionality review of a capital sentence), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1145 , 120 S.Ct. 1003 , 145 L.Ed.2d 945 (2000); United States v. Webster, 162 F.3d 30…
green
Malik v. State (2003)
See Miles v. State, 365 Md. 488, 570 , 781 A.2d 787 (2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1163 , 122 S.Ct. 1175 , 152 L.Ed.2d 118 (2002); Klauenberg v. State, 355 Md. 528, 555 , 735 A.2d 1061 (1999).
green
Brannen v. State (2003)
See Brannen, supra, 534 U. S. at 1163.