United States v. Northrop Corp. (1996)
green
· 31 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199720112026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Nelson v. Miller (1999)
But see Futernick v. Sumpter Township, 78 F.3d 1051, 1055 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. ——, 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996), which articulated this Court's understanding of how we are to view this language in Pennhurst : It is error to read the language about the 'party in interest’ as an extension of Eleventh Amendment immunity to actions seeking injunctive relief against a state officer who is violating federal law_ To the extent the text of Penn-hurst supports s…
yellow
Nelson v. Miller (1999)
But see Futernick v. Sumpter Township, 78 F.3d 1051, 1055 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996), which articulated this Court's understanding of how we are to view this language in Pennhurst: It is error to read the language about the 'party in interest' as an extension of Eleventh Amendment immunity to actions seeking injunctive relief against a state officer who is violating federal law....
green
Rambus, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG (2001)
Applying Illinois law, the Ro-boset've court explained that “[cjompensa-tory damages for fraud are intended to compensate for any injury which is the direct and natural consequence of the plaintiffs acting on the faith of defendant’s representations.” Id. at 273-74 (internal quotations omitted).
internal quotations omitted
green
Dixon v. Kirby (2002)
Thornburgh, supra, 490 U.S. at 408 , 109 S.Ct. 1874 , 104 L.Ed.2d 459 ; Montcalm Publishing Corp. v. Beck, 80 F.3d 105, 109 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996) (“The Supreme Court has clearly recognized a First Amendment interest in those who wish to communicate with prison inmates, although it has expressly reserved the question of how that interest operates in the case of ‘mass mailings.’ ”) 6 Inmates have a corresponding leg…
“The Supreme Court has clearly recognized a First Amendment interest in those who wish to communicate with prison inmates, although it has expressly reserved the question of how that interest operates in the case of ‘mass mailings.’ ”
green
Futernick v. Sumpter Township (2000)
See Futernick v. Sumpter Township, 78 F.3d 1051 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996).
green
Montcalm Publishing v. Commonwealth of VA (1999)
See Montcalm Publ’g Corp. v. Beck, 80 F.3d 105 , 106 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996).
green
Susan Stemler v. City of Florence Bobby Joe Wince Thomas Dusing and John Dolan, William Chipman, Administrato… (1997)
See, e.g., Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 373 , 6 S.Ct. 1064, 1072-73 , 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886). 77 Furthermore, while a plaintiff in a selective-prosecution case must demonstrate that she was prosecuted because she was the member of some group, and not merely because the state actor prosecuted her out of purely personal animosity, see Futernick v. Sumpter Twp., 78 F.3d 1051 , 1057 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996), the availabili…
green
Medina v. City of East Chicago, Indiana (2001)
See Futernick v. Sumpter Township, 78 F.3d 1051 , 1056 n. 7 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 296 , 136 L.Ed.2d 215 (1996); (suggesting that personal animosity between the parties should not turn an otherwise valid enforcement action into a constitutional violation actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ).