Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Harold's Stores, Inc. (1996)

green · 44 citation events across 12 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 13

Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199720112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Leon, D.M. (1997)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1541-42 (10th Cir.) (discussing the principle that interlocutory orders are usually not immediately appealable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Mitchell v. City of Moore (2000)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Gordon M. Becker v. University of Nebraska, at Omaha (1999)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533 , 1540 n. 3 (10th Cir.) (noting appellant's burden to provide reviewing court with essential references to record to carry its burden of proving error), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green City of Hobbs v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and Nutmeg Insurance Company (1998)

Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also

See also Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Rick Webb v. Abf Freight System, Inc., a Corporation, and Teamsters Local Union No. 17 (1998)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Audiotext Communications Network, Inc. v. U.S. Telecom, Inc. (1998)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533 , 1540 n. 3 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996). 33 We review de novo Audiotext's claim that the district court misinterpreted Fla.Stat.Ann. § 768.73 by applying it to Audiotext's award of punitive damages.

green Lancaster v. Independent School District No. 5 (1998)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep’t Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Maria F. Ramirez v. Ibp, Inc. (1998)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc., 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green United States Surgical Corp. v. Orris, Inc. (1997)

Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See id. at 1546 n. 9 (“Because deficiencies in the survey bear on the weight and not the admissibility of the evidence, ... we reject [defendant’s] arguments that ... the survey questions were slanted, leading, and ambiguous.”).

green Brodtmann v. Duke (2002)

Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see

See Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Dep't Stores, 82 F.3d 1533, 1555 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Hillman v. United States Postal Service (2001)

Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see

Co., 36 F.3d 1491 , 1502 (10th Cir.1994) (citation omitted); see Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, 82 F.3d 1533, 1546 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 928 , 117 S.Ct. 297 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996).

green Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc. (1998)

Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see

green Forgione v. Dennis Pirtle Agency, Inc. (1997)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Can Do, Inc. Pension & Profit Sharing Plan v. Manier, Herod, Hollabaugh & Smith, 922 S.W.2d 865, 868 (Tenn.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 298 , 136 L.Ed.2d 216 (1996), which cites a number of cases where other jurisdictions have concluded that public policy considerations militate against allowing assignment of legal malpractice actions.