How cited: Brown v. Mendel · Go Syfert

Brown v. Mendel (1997)

green · 15 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 4 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Cited (see also) · N.C. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
Ed. 2d 662 (1986); see also Edward Valves, Inc. v. Wake Cty., 343 N.C. 426, 434 , 471 S.E.2d 342, 347 (1996) (“State remedies are only relevant when a Section 1983 action is brought for a violation of procedural due process.” (citations omitted)), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1112 , 136 L.
Cited · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Edward Valves, Inc. v. Wake County, 343 N.C. 426, 434-35 , 471 S.E.2d 342, 347 (1996) (holding that ž 1983 action based on violation of substantive constitutional rightÔÇöas opposed to procedural due processÔÇönot precluded by failure to exhaust state administrative remedies), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1112 , 117 S.Ct. 952 , 136 L.Ed.2d 839 (1997); Good Hope Hosp., 174 N.C.App. at 272 , 620 S.E.2d at 879 ("Violation of a substantive constitutional right may be the subject o…
Cited · Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · signal: accord
A "control person” claim under § 20(a) of the Exchange Act requires proof that (1) BLMIS committed a primary violation of the securities laws, (2) Picower had the power to control the business affairs of BLMIS, and (3) and Picower "had the requisite power to directly or indirectly control or influence the specific corporate policy which resulted in primary liability.” Mizzaro v. Home Depot, Inc., 544 F.3d 1230, 1237 (11th Cir.2008) (quoting Theoharous v. Fong, 256 F.3d 1219
Cited · N.C. Ct. App. · signal: see
See Edward Valves, Inc. v. Wake County, 343 N.C. 426, 435 , 471 S.E.2d 342, 347 (1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1112 , 136 L.Ed. 2d 839 (1997); Copper ex rel.