How cited: Roberson v. Estelle · Go Syfert

Roberson v. Estelle (1983)

green · 72 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509 , 102 S.Ct. 1198 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); see, e.g., Hall v. Iowa, 705 F.2d 283, 286-87 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States v. Dysart, 705 F.2d 1247, 1256 (10th Cir.) (threatening letters mailed to President), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 307 (1983); United States v. Smith, 670 F.2d 921 , 923 & n. 4 (10th Cir.1982) (threatening letter mailed to President); United States v. Hart, 457 F.2d 1087, 1090 (10th Cir.) (threatening call made to FBI), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 861 , 93 S.Ct. 150 , 34 L.Ed.2d 108 (1972). 49 I agree that this approach is consi…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Frazier v. Manson, 703 F.2d 30, 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 [ 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 ] (1983).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Zabel, 702 F.2d 704, 707-08 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Frazier v. Manson, 703 F.2d 30, 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Frazier v. Manson, 703 F.2d 30, 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
See also Frazier v. Manson, 703 F.2d 30, 36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983), and cases cited therein.
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See, United States v. Zabel, 702 F.2d 704, 710 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Gukeisen v. United States, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(a).
Cited · D.D.C. · signal: see
See United States v. Unger, 700 F.2d 445, 451-54 (8th Cir.) (remanding for resentencing on account of conflict that adversely affected representation during sentencing but holding “plea should stand” because “there was no conflict of interest that adversely affected [the defendant’s] representation when she pleaded guilty”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983); see also Lopez v. Scully, 58 F.3d 38, 43 (2d Cir.1995) (sending case back to state c…
green Brooks v. State (1993)
Cited · Ala. Crim. App. · signal: see
See Frazier v. Manson , 703 F.2d 30 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 934 , 104 S.Ct. 339 , 78 L.Ed.2d 308 (1983) (statute that increased good time for inmates sentenced after October 1, 1976, discriminates against prisoners sentenced before that date and cannot be upheld in absence of rational basis for difference in treatment).
statute that increased good time for inmates sentenced after October 1, 1976, discriminates against prisoners sentenced before that date and cannot be upheld in absence of rational basis for difference in treatment