How cited: Howze v. Marshall · Go Syfert

Howze v. Marshall (1984)

green · 358 citation events across 102 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198420052026
green In re Miller (1994)
Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Ohio
Id. at 363.
Quote Authority · Me. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 276 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (“[I]t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of [sic] the bankruptcy petition is filed.”).
“[I]t is only the right of redemption, rather than the property itself, which passes into the bankruptcy estate if the redemption period has not expired at the time of [sic] the bankruptcy petition is filed.”
Quote Authority · M.D. Tenn.
Bank of Montevideo, Minn., *135 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (“Although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity, [citation omitted] its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the Code.”); In re Pirsig Farms, Inc., 46 B.R. 237, 240 (D.Minn.1985) (though bankruptcy courts have the authority to take steps not specifically authorized …
“Although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity, [citation omitted] its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the Code.”
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
In Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984), the Eighth Circuit analyzed the limitation on bankruptcy courts’ equitable powers and held that, “[although a bankruptcy court is essentially a court of equity ... its broad equitable powers may only be exercised in a manner which is consistent with the provisions of the [Bankruptcy] Code.” Id. at 273; see also, In re J.M.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). . 469 U.S. 412 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 (1985). "[T]he Witkerspoon-Witt standard is rooted in the constitutional right to an impartial jury_" Gray v. Mississippi, — U.S. at -, 107 S.Ct. at 2056. .
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
green Hakeem v. Beyer (1993)
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 , 402 n. 9 (5th Cir.1983) (Buchmeyer, D.J., dissenting), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Wright v. North Carolina, 483 F.2d 405, 408 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1452 , 39 L.Ed.2d 494 (1974). 74 Here, in rejecting the findings of the state appellate court, the district court appears to have relied on subsections (1) and (8) without further analysis.
green Hakeem v. Beyer (1993)
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 , 402 n. 9 (5th Cir.1983) (Buchmeyer, D.J., dissenting), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Wright v. North Carolina, 483 F.2d 405, 408 (4th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 1452 , 39 L.Ed.2d 494 (1974).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1983) (bankruptcy court lacked authority under general equitable power section, 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a) to stay indefinitely expiration of statutory redemption period created by state law in connection with real estate mortgage foreclosure).
bankruptcy court lacked authority under general equitable power section, 11 U.S.C. § 105 (a) to stay indefinitely expiration of statutory redemption period created by state law in connection with real estate mortgage foreclosure
Cited · 4th Cir. · signal: accord
Accord O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); cf. Boyde v. California, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1190, 1196 , 108 L.Ed.2d 316 (1990) (“states are free to structure and shape consideration of mitigating evidence”).
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Eagle Elk, 711 F.2d 80, 81 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); United States v. Skinner, 667 F.2d 1306 , 1309 n. 1 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 3569 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1410 (1983).
green Rogers v. Lynaugh (1988)
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974); see also O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 387 (5th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 755-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); see Kirkpatrick v. Blackburn, 777 F.2d 272, 278, 280 (5th Cir.1985),…
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see also
Conclusion 24 For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is 25 AFFIRMED. * Circuit Judge of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation 1 Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974); see also O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 387 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980); Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 75
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 12 Accordingly, the lower courts' decision to lift the bankruptcy code's automatic stay is affirmed.
Cited (see also) · 5th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Munroe v. State, 637 S.W.2d 475, 476-77 (Tex.Crim.App.1982) (en banc). . 714 F.2d 365, 388-89 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973). 19 .
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Monte *249 video, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 3 Here, appellant clearly failed to comply with the notice and application requirements of the Bankruptcy Code and Rules.
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 372 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 2.
green Moore v. Maggio (1984)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 377-78 (discussing rehabilitation of veniremen challenged on Witherspoon grounds), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
green Moore v. Maggio (1984)
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 377-78 (discussing rehabilitation of veniremen challenged on Witherspoon grounds), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
green Lauti v. State (1991)
Cited (see also) · Tex. Crim. App. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See also O'Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 383-385 (5th Cir.1983), cert, denied 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · Bankr. D. Minn. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · Bankr. S.D. Florida · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Texas Consumer Finance Corp., 480 F.2d 1261, 1265 (5th Cir.1973).
Cited (see also) · Conn. Super. Ct. · signal: see, e.g.
Although the majority of courts have concluded that the stay imposed pursuant to § 362(a) does not toll the running of a redemption period; see, e.g., Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Tabor Enterprises, Inc. v. People of the State of Ill., 65 B.R. 42 (N.D.
Cited (see also) · Bankr. N.D. Cal. · signal: see also
In re B & W Enter., Inc., 713 F.2d 534 (1983); In re Pacific Express, Inc., 69 B.R. 112, 115 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1986); see also Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited (see also) · D.N.H. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Johnson v. First Nat'l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984) (Bankruptcy Code may not be invoked to toll or suspend the running of a statutory period of redemption created by state law absent fraud, mistake, accident or erroneous conduct by the foreclosing officer. 11 U.S.C. 105(a)). 4 .
Bankruptcy Code may not be invoked to toll or suspend the running of a statutory period of redemption created by state law absent fraud, mistake, accident or erroneous conduct by the foreclosing officer. 11 U.S.C. 105(a)
Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see also
See also Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270, 273-75 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). .In Butner , the Court struck down a uniform federal rule of law that altered the property rights of a mortgagee as they existed at state law.
Cited · Bankr. S.D. Ohio · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 , 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 [ 79 L.Ed.2d 245 ], (1984) [additional citations omitted].
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
See also Johnson v. First National Bank (8th Cir. 1983), 719 F.2d 270 , 276, cert, denied (1984), 465 U.S. 1012 , 79 L.
green Matter of Sabec (1992)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. W.D. Mich. · signal: see also
If a debtor desires to retain an interest in real property sold at a valid foreclosure sale, the plan must provide for the payment of the entire redemption amount within the later of (1) the redemption period fixed by state law, 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(1), or (2) sixty days after the debtor files the bankruptcy petition (assuming the redemption period has not already expired). 11 U.S.C. § 108 (b)(2); see also, Johnson v. First Natl Bank, 719 F.2d 270 , 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert, …
Cited (see also) · Bankr. E.D. Pa. · signal: see also
See also Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 278 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · Bankr. D.N.J. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited (see also) · Bankr. W.D. Tenn. · signal: see also
Id.; see also ftn. 15, at p. 1215, where the Moody court observed that application of Section 108(b) would “cause irreconcilable conflict between the two sections,” citing Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984). 8 Additionally, Congress clearly was aware of the existence of Section 108(b) when the 1984 Amendments were enacted; therefore, the omission of any reference to S…
Cited · Bankr. E.D. Va. · signal: see
See, Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); Fisher v. First Union Mortgage Corp. (In re Fisher) 80 B.R. 58, 62 (Bankr.M.D.N.C.1987).
green Martin v. State (1988)
Cited (see also) · Ala. Crim. App. · signal: see also
See also O'Bryan v. Estelle , 714 F.2d 365 , 388-89 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited (see also) · D. Utah · signal: see also
See also Johnson v. First Nat’l Bank of Montevideo, Minn., 719 F.2d 270, 273 (8th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984), and cases cited therein.
Cited · Bankr. D. Nev. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (appealed on other grounds), citing In re Interstate Restaurant Systems, Inc., 26 B.R. 298, 301 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1982) and In re Santa Fe Development, 16 B.R. 165, 167 (Bankr. 9th Cir.1981).
Cited (see also) · Bankr. S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also, Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1012 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
green Ross v. State (1986)
Cited (see also) · Okla. Crim. App. · signal: see also
See also Stafford v. State, 665 P.2d 1205 (Okl.Cr.1983), vacated, 467 U.S. 1212 , 104 S.Ct. 2651 , 81 L.Ed.2d 359 (1984), aff'd., 700 P.2d 223 (1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 188 , 88 L.Ed.2d 157 (1985) and O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
green In Re Stern (1985)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
In re Player’s Pub, Inc., 3 Bankr.L.Rep., (CCH) para. 70,200 at 86,321 (Bkrtcy.D.Mass.1985); In re Physique Forum Gym, Inc., 27 B.R. 691 (Bkrtcy.D.Md.1982); See also Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re G-N Partners, 48 B.R. 462 , 12 B.C.D. 1258 (D.Minn.1985).
green In Re McCallen (1985)
Cited (see also) · Bankr. D. Or. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minn, (hereinafter “Johnson ”), 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Cucumber Creek Development, Inc., 33 B.R. 820 (D.Colo.1983); In re Petersen, 42 B.R. 39 (Bankr.D.Or.1984).
green In Re G-N Partners (1985)
Cited · Bankr. D. Minn. · signal: see
See Martinson v. First National Bank of Oakes (In re Martinson), 731 F.2d 543 (8th Cir.1984), Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. den., — U.S.-, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).
Cited · D. Minnesota · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, 719 F.2d 270, 274 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Wood, 33 B.R. 320, 322 (Bankr.D.Id.1983).
Cited · Bankr. D. Mass. · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank, 719 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); In re Lauderdale Motorcar Corp., 35 B.R. 544 , 11 B.C.D. 517 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1983); In re Intermet Realty Partnership, 26 B.R. 383 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1983); and In re Darwin, 22 B.R. 259 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1982) Cf. Butner v. United States, 440 U.S. 48 , 99 S.Ct. 914 , 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979).
Cited · Ct. Intl. Trade · signal: see
See Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo, Minnesota, 719 F.2d 270, 277 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984).