5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Campbell
green
2 sentences2021Consequently, he must be sentenced under the lesser penalty provisions for violation of 65-4152(a)(3)." 279 Kan. at 16-17 . 2021Consequently, he must be sentenced under the lesser penalty provisions for violation of 65-4152(a)(3)." 279 Kan. at 16-17 . | 5 | 2005–2021 |
State v. Frazier
green
2 sentences2012Consequently, he must be sentenced under the lesser penalty provisions for violation of 65-4152(a)(3)." Campbell, 279 Kan. at 16-17 , 106 P.3d 1129 . *744 In arguing for this result, Campbell cited and relied on the Court of Appeals decision in Frazier, 30 Kan.App.2d 398 , 42 P.3d 188 . 2012Consequently, he must be sentenced under the lesser penalty provisions for violation of 65-4152(a)(3)." Campbell, 279 Kan. at 16-17 , 106 P.3d 1129 . *744 In arguing for this result, Campbell cited and relied on the Court of Appeals decision in Frazier, 30 Kan.App.2d 398 , 42 P.3d 188 . | 2 | 2010–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.