5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Puckettgreen2 sentences2010Trevino acknowledges that he did not object to the constitutionality of his sentence in the district court but maintains that this court may review his claim under exceptions to the rule barring review set out in State v. Puckett, 230 Kan. 596 , 640 P.2d 1198 (1982). 2010Trevino acknowledges that he did not object to the constitutionality of his sentence in the district court but maintains that this court may review his claim under exceptions to the rule barring review set out in State v. Puckett, 230 Kan. 596 , 640 P.2d 1198 (1982). | 1 | 2 |
State v. McCarleygreen2 sentences2011See State v. McCarley, 287 Kan. 167, 173-76 , 195 P.3d 230 (2008). 2011See State v. McCarley, 287 Kan. 167, 173-76 , 195 P.3d 230 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dickey
green
2 sentences2020See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22-3504(a); State v. Dickey, 301 Kan. 1018, 1034 , 350 P.3d 1054 (2015). 2020See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22-3504(a); State v. Dickey, 301 Kan. 1018, 1034 , 350 P.3d 1054 (2015). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Craven
green
2 sentences1983State v. Craven, 215 Kan. 546, 550 , 527 P.2d 1003 (1974). 1983State v. Craven, 215 Kan. 546, 550 , 527 P.2d 1003 (1974). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.