5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of Educationgreen1 sentence1993Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 721 F.2d 550, 562 (6th Cir. 1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill
green
2 sentences2015The pretermination hearing is "an initial check against mistaken decisions" and "need not definitively resolve the propriety of the discharge." 470 U.S. at 545 . 2015The pretermination hearing is “an initial check against mistaken decisions” and “need not definitively resolve the propriety of the discharge.” 470 U.S. at 545 . | 3 | 1993–2015 |
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
1 sentence2006Ed. 2d 18 , 96 S. Ct. 893 (1976), whether a pretermination hearing is required to protect an individual’s property interest depends upon three factors: (1) the private interest at stake; (2) the risk of an erroneous deprivation through the procedures applied; and (3) the government’s interest in prompt termination. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
McMillen v. U.S.D. No. 380
green
2 sentences1995No. 380, 253 Kan. 259 , 855 P.2d 896 (1993): A tenured teacher is entitled to receive salary until granted a pretermination hearing, or the end of the contract year, whichever occurs last. 1995No. 380, 253 Kan. 259 , 855 P.2d 896 (1993): A tenured teacher is entitled to receive salary until granted a pretermination hearing, or the end of the contract year, whichever occurs last. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Boddie v. Connecticut
green
1 sentence1993We have pointed out that ‘[t]he formality and procedural requisites for the hearing can vary, depending upon the importance of the interests involved and the nature of the subsequent proceedings.’ Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S., at 378 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.