5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Washington v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2022Washington, 37 Kan. 2011Pierpoint, 271 Kan. at 627-28 , 24 P.3d 128 ; see Washington v. Roberts, 37 Kan.App.2d 237 , Syl. ¶ 3, 152 P.3d 660 (2007). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint
green
2 sentences2026In re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint, 271 Kan. 620, 627 , 24 P.3d 128 (2001) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-66 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. 2026In re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint, 271 Kan. 620, 627 , 24 P.3d 128 (2001) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-66 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. | 2 | 2011–2026 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences2026In re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint, 271 Kan. 620, 627 , 24 P.3d 128 (2001) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-66 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. 2026In re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint, 271 Kan. 620, 627 , 24 P.3d 128 (2001) (citing Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-66 , 94 S. Ct. 2963 , 41 L. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Cole v. City of Kansas City
green
2 sentences1961It is clear from the decision that where a plaintiff sustains injury for which he claims damages, regardless of their nature, against a city, recovery is limited to such damages as are sustained within the period of three months under 12-105, supra, immediately preceding the filing of the written statement of claim with the city. ( Jeakins v. City of El Dorado, supra; Cole v. Kansas City, 141 Kan. 633 , 42 P.2d 940 ; Steifer v. City of Kansas City, supra; and Watkins v. City of El Dorado, supra.) However, it was held in Avery v. City of Lyons, 183 Kan. 611 , 331 P.2d 906 , the statute makes no 1961It is clear from the decision that where a plaintiff sustains injury for which he claims damages, regardless of their nature, against a city, recovery is limited to such damages as are sustained within the period of three months under 12-105, supra, immediately preceding the filing of the written statement of claim with the city. ( Jeakins v. City of El Dorado, supra; Cole v. Kansas City, 141 Kan. 633 , 42 P.2d 940 ; Steifer v. City of Kansas City, supra; and Watkins v. City of El Dorado, supra.) However, it was held in Avery v. City of Lyons, 183 Kan. 611 , 331 P.2d 906 , the statute makes no | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Avery v. City of Lyons
green
2 sentences1961It is clear from the decision that where a plaintiff sustains injury for which he claims damages, regardless of their nature, against a city, recovery is limited to such damages as are sustained within the period of three months under 12-105, supra, immediately preceding the filing of the written statement of claim with the city. ( Jeakins v. City of El Dorado, supra; Cole v. Kansas City, 141 Kan. 633 , 42 P.2d 940 ; Steifer v. City of Kansas City, supra; and Watkins v. City of El Dorado, supra.) However, it was held in Avery v. City of Lyons, 183 Kan. 611 , 331 P.2d 906 , the statute makes no 1961It is clear from the decision that where a plaintiff sustains injury for which he claims damages, regardless of their nature, against a city, recovery is limited to such damages as are sustained within the period of three months under 12-105, supra, immediately preceding the filing of the written statement of claim with the city. ( Jeakins v. City of El Dorado, supra; Cole v. Kansas City, 141 Kan. 633 , 42 P.2d 940 ; Steifer v. City of Kansas City, supra; and Watkins v. City of El Dorado, supra.) However, it was held in Avery v. City of Lyons, 183 Kan. 611 , 331 P.2d 906 , the statute makes no | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.