special charge constitutes reversible error (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

special charge constitutes reversible error in Louisiana

5 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2006 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Wrightgreen
lactapp · 1992 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1996
2 sentences

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

1994Furthermore, failure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right. *603 State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759 (La.App. 5 Cir.1992), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992).

12
State v. Fradieugreen
lactapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006State v. Edwards, 25,963 (La.App. 2d Cir.05/04/94), 637 So.2d 600 ; see also State v. Fradieu, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 4th Cir.06/25/03), 851 So.2d 345 , writ denied, 2003-2079 (La.01/16/04), 864 So.2d 627 .

11
State v. Sparksgreen
la · 2004 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
1 sentence

2006State v. Edwards, 25,963 (La.App. 2d Cir.05/04/94), 637 So.2d 600 ; see also State v. Fradieu, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 4th Cir.06/25/03), 851 So.2d 345 , writ denied, 2003-2079 (La.01/16/04), 864 So.2d 627 .

11
State v. Westgreen
la · 1990 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
1 sentence

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

11
State v. Pettawaygreen
lactapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See State v. Pettaway, 450 So.2d 1345 (La.App. 2 Cir.1984), writs denied at 456 So.2d 171 (La.1984).

11
State v. Pettawaygreen
la · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
1 sentence

1992See State v. Pettaway, 450 So.2d 1345 (La.App. 2 Cir.1984), writs denied at 456 So.2d 171 (La.1984).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Edwards neutral
lactapp · 1994
2 sentences

2006State v. Edwards, 25,963 (La.App. 2d Cir.05/04/94), 637 So.2d 600 ; see also State v. Fradieu, XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 4th Cir.06/25/03), 851 So.2d 345 , writ denied, 2003-2079 (La.01/16/04), 864 So.2d 627 .

1996State v. Edwards, 93-2596 (La. 5/4/94); 637 So.2d 600 .

21996–2006
State v. Wright green
la · 1992
2 sentences

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

1994Furthermore, failure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right. *603 State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759 (La.App. 5 Cir.1992), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992).

21994–1996
Peavey v. Polytechnic Institute of New York green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

1994Furthermore, failure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right. *603 State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759 (La.App. 5 Cir.1992), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992).

21994–1996
Arnold v. Resolution Trust Corp. green
scotus · 1992
2 sentences

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

1994Furthermore, failure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right. *603 State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759 (La.App. 5 Cir.1992), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La. 1992), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992).

21994–1996
Boston v. Illinois green
scotus · 1992
1 sentence

1996In addition, in State v. Wright, 593 So.2d 759, 766 (La.App. 5 Cir.), writ denied, 599 So.2d 313 (La.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 922 , 113 S.Ct. 340 , 121 L.Ed.2d 257 (1992), the court held that, "[F]ailure to read a special charge constitutes reversible error only when there is a *561 miscarriage of justice, prejudice to the substantial rights of the accused or a violation of a constitutional or statutory right." In State v. West, 568 So.2d 1019, 1023 (La.1990), the court outlined the standard for evaluating jury instructions, as follows: The test articulated is whether, taking the instruct

11996–1996

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check