5 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beka Industries, Inc. v. Worcester County Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2018Beka , 419 Md. at 216 , 18 A.3d at 904 ("Consequently, sovereign immunity was not an issue in [ Chesapeake Charter ]."). 2018Beka , 419 Md. at 216 , 18 A.3d at 904 ("Consequently, sovereign immunity was not an issue in [ Chesapeake Charter ]."). | 1 | 1 |
Jacoby v. Arkansas Department of Educationgreen2 sentences2009Dep’t of Educ., 338 Ark. 505 , 995 S.W.2d 353, 354 (1999) (ordering rebriefing on the issue of sovereign immunity in light of Alden); Boise Cascade Corp. v. State ex rel. 2009Dep’t of Educ., 338 Ark. 505 , 995 S.W.2d 353, 354 (1999) (ordering rebriefing on the issue of sovereign immunity in light of Alden); Boise Cascade Corp. v. State ex rel. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pendleton v. State
green
2 sentences2010In support of its argument, the State cites Pendelton [sic] v. State of Maryland, 398 Md. 447 [ 921 A.2d 196 ] (2007). 2010In support of its argument, the State cites Pendelton [sic] v. State of Maryland, 398 Md. 447 [ 921 A.2d 196 ] (2007). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Kee v. State Highway Administration
green
2 sentences1995Kee v. State Highway Administration, 313 Md. 445, 455 , 545 A.2d 1312 (1988). 1995Kee v. State Highway Administration, 313 Md. 445, 455 , 545 A.2d 1312 (1988). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Foor v. Juvenile Services Administration
green
2 sentences1995But the issue of sovereign immunity may be raised for the first time on appeal, Foor v. Juvenile Services Administration, 78 Md.App. 151, 160 , 552 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 316 Md. 364, 558 A.2d 1206 (1989), because sovereign immunity may only be waived by an act of the Legislature or a constitutional amendment. 1995But the issue of sovereign immunity may be raised for the first time on appeal, Foor v. Juvenile Services Administration, 78 Md.App. 151, 160 , 552 A.2d 947 , cert. denied, 316 Md. 364, 558 A.2d 1206 (1989), because sovereign immunity may only be waived by an act of the Legislature or a constitutional amendment. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Harden v. Mass Transit Administration
green
1 sentence1988The Court did “not reach the issue of sovereign immunity.” 277 *149 Md. at 413, 354 A.2d at 824 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.