5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
International Harvester Co. of America v. Eaton Circuit Judge
green
2 sentences2008In Int’l Harvester Co of America v Eaton Circuit Judge, 163 Mich 55 ; 127 NW 695 (1910), this Court stated: This brings us to the doctrine, founded in public policy and convenience and supported by an almost unanimous consensus of judicial opinion, which is that rightfulness of the existence of a body claiming to act, and in fact acting in the face of the State, as a 9 We emphasize that in no way are we passing judgment on the lawfulness of plaintiff’s incorporation. 2008In Int’l Harvester Co of America v Eaton Circuit Judge, 163 Mich 55 ; 127 NW 695 (1910), this Court stated: This brings us to the doctrine, founded in public policy and convenience and supported by an almost unanimous consensus of judicial opinion, which is that rightfulness of the existence of a body claiming to act, and in fact acting in the face of the State, as a 9 We emphasize that in no way are we passing judgment on the lawfulness of plaintiff’s incorporation. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Gauthier
green
2 sentences1974In People v Gauthier, 28 Mich App 318 ; 184 NW2d 488 (1970), lv den 384 Mich 812 (1971), this Court held that although error was committed when certain business records were admitted into evidence, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the overwhelming convicting evidence which had been presented. 1974In People v Gauthier, 28 Mich App 318 ; 184 NW2d 488 (1970), lv den 384 Mich 812 (1971), this Court held that although error was committed when certain business records were admitted into evidence, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the overwhelming convicting evidence which had been presented. | 2 | 1973–1974 |
The TRAVELERS INDEM. CO. v. Duffin
green
2 sentences1974In People v Gauthier, 28 Mich App 318 ; 184 NW2d 488 (1970), lv den 384 Mich 812 (1971), this Court held that although error was committed when certain business records were admitted into evidence, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the overwhelming convicting evidence which had been presented. 1974In People v Gauthier, 28 Mich App 318 ; 184 NW2d 488 (1970), lv den 384 Mich 812 (1971), this Court held that although error was committed when certain business records were admitted into evidence, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because of the over-whelming convicting evidence which had been presented. | 2 | 1973–1974 |
Sorrells v. United States
green
2 sentences1990Entrapment has been defined as the "conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for trickery, persuasion, or fraud of the officer." Sorrells v United States, 287 US 435, 454 ; 53 S Ct 210 ; 77 L Ed 413 (1932). 1990Entrapment has been defined as the "conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for trickery, persuasion, or fraud of the officer." Sorrells v United States, 287 US 435, 454 ; 53 S Ct 210 ; 77 L Ed 413 (1932). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.