Applicable Law defendant (Michigan) · Go Syfert
← Michigan issues

Applicable Law defendant in Michigan

5 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Budzyn green
mich · 1997
2 sentences

2018People v Budzyn, 456 Mich 77, 88 ; 566 NW2d 229 (1997).

2018People v Budzyn, 456 Mich 77, 88 ; 566 NW2d 229 (1997).

22018–2018
People v. Petri green
michctapp · 2008
2 sentences

2016People v Payne, 285 Mich App 181, 188 ; 774 NW2d 714 (2009); People v Petri, 279 Mich App 407, 410 ; 760 NW2d 882 (2008).

2016People v Payne, 285 Mich App 181, 188 ; 774 NW2d 714 (2009); People v Petri, 279 Mich App 407, 410 ; 760 NW2d 882 (2008).

22016–2016
People v. Payne green
michctapp · 2009
2 sentences

2016People v Payne, 285 Mich App 181, 188 ; 774 NW2d 714 (2009); People v Petri, 279 Mich App 407, 410 ; 760 NW2d 882 (2008).

2016People v Payne, 285 Mich App 181, 188 ; 774 NW2d 714 (2009); People v Petri, 279 Mich App 407, 410 ; 760 NW2d 882 (2008).

22016–2016
People v. Ginther green
mich · 1973
2 sentences

2016A. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW Because defendant did not move for a new trial or a Ginther1 hearing in the trial court, and no Ginther hearing was held,2 our review of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). 2 Defendant filed a motion to remand this case for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(1), which we denied.

2016A. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND APPLICABLE LAW Because defendant did not move for a new trial or a Ginther1 hearing in the trial court, and no Ginther hearing was held,2 our review of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is 1 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436, 443 ; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). 2 Defendant filed a motion to remand this case for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to MCR 7.211(C)(1), which we denied.

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.227b (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.316 (4) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.224f (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 114 (1992–2025) LA 20 (2001–2025) CA 14 (1994–2026) AR 6 (2016–2024) MI 5 (2016–2018) FL 3 (1987–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check