5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saveski v. Tiseo Architects, Inc.green2 sentences2015See Saveski, 261 Mich App at 555 ; Cipriano, 289 Mich App at 368 . 2015See Saveski, 261 Mich App at 555 ; Cipriano, 289 Mich App at 368 . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cipriano v. Cipriano
green
2 sentences2015See Saveski, 261 Mich App at 555 ; Cipriano, 289 Mich App at 368 . 2015See Saveski, 261 Mich App at 555 ; Cipriano, 289 Mich App at 368 . | 2 | 2015–2015 |
City of Ann Arbor v. American Federation of State Employees Local 369
green
1 sentence2018We disagree. -1- “This Court reviews de novo a trial court’s decision to enforce, vacate, or modify an arbitration award.” City of Ann Arbor v American Federation of State, Co, & Muni Employees (AFSCME) Local 369, 284 Mich App 126, 144 ; 771 NW2d 843 (2009). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ann Arbor v. AFSCME LOCAL 369
green
1 sentence2018We disagree. -1- “This Court reviews de novo a trial court’s decision to enforce, vacate, or modify an arbitration award.” City of Ann Arbor v American Federation of State, Co, & Muni Employees (AFSCME) Local 369, 284 Mich App 126, 144 ; 771 NW2d 843 (2009). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Gogebic Medical Care Facility v. AFSCME Local 992
green
2 sentences1999See Steelworkers trilogy; Gogebic Medical Care Facility v. AFSCME Local 992, AFL-CIO, 209 Mich.App. 693, 696-697 , 531 N.W.2d 728 (1995). [36] Initially, a federal district court decided that the arbitrator made no error of law and confirmed the arbitration award. 1999See Steelworkers trilogy; Gogebic Medical Care Facility v. AFSCME Local 992, AFL-CIO, 209 Mich.App. 693, 696-697 , 531 N.W.2d 728 (1995). [36] Initially, a federal district court decided that the arbitrator made no error of law and confirmed the arbitration award. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Collins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
green
1 sentence1999Collins v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 916 F.Supp. 638 (E.D.Mich., 1995). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Jones v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange
neutral
2 sentences1988Judge Danhof stated: [Bjecause there is a split of authority in our Court, I cannot say that the arbitrator made an error of law in following Jones v DAIIE, 124 Mich App 363 ; 335 NW2d 39 (1983), lv den 418 Mich 878 (1983) [holding that the threshold does not apply to uninsured motorists]. [Id. at slip op, p 5.] In an apparent reconciliation of the two rationales for upholding the judgment of the court below, the per curiam opinion stated: Further, in so holding, we cannot find that the arbitrators made an error of law in following Jones. [Id. at slip op, p 4.] 429 Mich 858 (1987). 1988Judge Danhof stated: [Bjecause there is a split of authority in our Court, I cannot say that the arbitrator made an error of law in following Jones v DAIIE, 124 Mich App 363 ; 335 NW2d 39 (1983), lv den 418 Mich 878 (1983) [holding that the threshold does not apply to uninsured motorists]. [Id. at slip op, p 5.] In an apparent reconciliation of the two rationales for upholding the judgment of the court below, the per curiam opinion stated: Further, in so holding, we cannot find that the arbitrators made an error of law in following Jones. [Id. at slip op, p 4.] 429 Mich 858 (1987). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.