5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Sepulvadogreen2 sentences1972People v Sepulvado, 27 Mich App 66, 69 (1970); People v Jaworski, 25 Mich App 540 (1970). 1972People v Sepulvado, 27 Mich App 66, 69 (1970); People v Jaworski, 25 Mich App 540 (1970). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences2009Automatic reversal is required only when the trial court fails to procure “an enumeration and a waiver on the record of the three federal constitutional rights as set forth in Boykin v Alabama [ 395 US 238 ; 89 S Ct 1709 ; 23 L Ed 2d 274 (1969)]: the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one’s accusers.” Saffold, supra at 281 . 2009Automatic reversal is required only when the trial court fails to procure “an enumeration and a waiver on the record of the three federal constitutional rights as set forth in Boykin v Alabama [ 395 US 238 ; 89 S Ct 1709 ; 23 L Ed 2d 274 (1969)]: the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one’s accusers.” Saffold, supra at 281 . | 3 | 1970–2009 |
People v. Saffold
green
2 sentences2015Automatic reversal is required only when the trial court fails to procure “an enumeration and a waiver on the record of the three federal constitutional rights as set forth in Boykin . . .: the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one’s accusers.” Saffold, supra at 281 . 2009Automatic reversal is required only when the trial court fails to procure “an enumeration and a waiver on the record of the three federal constitutional rights as set forth in Boykin v Alabama [ 395 US 238 ; 89 S Ct 1709 ; 23 L Ed 2d 274 (1969)]: the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, the right to trial by jury, and the right to confront one’s accusers.” Saffold, supra at 281 . | 2 | 2009–2015 |
People v. Jaworski
green
2 sentences1972People v Sepulvado, 27 Mich App 66, 69 (1970); People v Jaworski, 25 Mich App 540 (1970). 1972People v Sepulvado, 27 Mich App 66, 69 (1970); People v Jaworski, 25 Mich App 540 (1970). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.