5 Minnesota opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Finden v. Klaasgreen2 sentences2015P. 60.02 by applying a four-factor test that was established in Hinz..." Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin, 744 N.W.2d 398, 402 (Minn.App.2008) review denied (Minn. Apr. 29, 2008); see also Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , 128 N.W.2d 748, 750 (1964) (reaffirming the Him test). 2015P. 60.02 by applying a four-factor test that was established in Hinz..." Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin, 744 N.W.2d 398, 402 (Minn.App.2008) review denied (Minn. Apr. 29, 2008); see also Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , 128 N.W.2d 748, 750 (1964) (reaffirming the Him test). | 1 | 2 |
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpingreen2 sentences2015P. 60.02 by applying a four-factor test that was established in Hinz..." Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin, 744 N.W.2d 398, 402 (Minn.App.2008) review denied (Minn. Apr. 29, 2008); see also Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , 128 N.W.2d 748, 750 (1964) (reaffirming the Him test). 2015P. 60.02 by applying a four-factor test that was established in Hinz..." Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin, 744 N.W.2d 398, 402 (Minn.App.2008) review denied (Minn. Apr. 29, 2008); see also Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268, 271 , 128 N.W.2d 748, 750 (1964) (reaffirming the Him test). | 1 | 2 |
Charson v. Temple Israelgreen2 sentences2008The supreme court concluded that Char-son had satisfied three of the Him factors and then stated that “before relief will be granted from a final order or judgment, the moving party must also establish to the satisfaction of the court that it possesses a meritorious claim.” Id. at 491 . 2008The supreme court concluded that Char-son had satisfied three of the Him factors and then stated that “before relief will be granted from a final order or judgment, the moving party must also establish to the satisfaction of the court that it possesses a meritorious claim.” Id. at 491 . | 1 | 2 |
Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.green2 sentences1989Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , 53 N.W.2d 454, 456 (1952); see also Charson v. Temple Israel, 419 N.W.2d 488, 491 (Minn.1988) (applying Him test). 1989Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30 , 53 N.W.2d 454, 456 (1952); see also Charson v. Temple Israel, 419 N.W.2d 488, 491 (Minn.1988) (applying Him test). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hengel v. Hyatt
green
2 sentences2008As authority for this point, the Charson court relied on Hengel , 312 Minn, at 319, 252 N.W.2d at 106 . 2008As authority for this point, the Charson court relied on Hengel , 312 Minn, at 319, 252 N.W.2d at 106 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Howard v. Frondell
green
2 sentences1990Although the right to relief from a judgment is not absolute, Howard, 387 N.W.2d at 207 , it is not necessary that all four Him factors be satisfied equally. 1990Although the right to relief from a judgment is not absolute, Howard, 387 N.W.2d at 207 , it is not necessary that all four Him factors be satisfied equally. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.