5 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tindall v. Tindallgreen2 sentences2002First, employing an auxiliary rule of construction, we note that as a general rule, “[t]he law favors vested estates, and the rule is that estates shall be held to vest at the earliest possible period, unless a contrary intention is clearly manifested in the grant.” Tindall v. Tindall, 167 Mo. 218 , 66 S.W. 1092, 1094 (1902) (emphasis added). 2002First, employing an auxiliary rule of construction, we note that as a general rule, “[t]he law favors vested estates, and the rule is that estates shall be held to vest at the earliest possible period, unless a contrary intention is clearly manifested in the grant.” Tindall v. Tindall, 167 Mo. 218 , 66 S.W. 1092, 1094 (1902) (emphasis added). | 1 | 2 |
Commerce Trust Company v. Weedgreen2 sentences1966“Where, as in the instant case, the intent may be clearly ascertained from the will itself, rules of that kind have little, if any, application.” Commerce Trust Co. v. Weed, Mo.Sup., 318 S.W.2d 289 [3]. 1965Tapley v. Dill, 358 Mo. 824 , 217 S.W.2d 369, 374 [10]; Commerce Trust Co. v. Weed, Mo.Sup., 318 S.W.2d 289, 294 [1, 2]. | 1 | 2 |
Tapley v. Dillgreen2 sentences1965Tapley v. Dill, 358 Mo. 824 , 217 S.W.2d 369, 374 [10]; Commerce Trust Co. v. Weed, Mo.Sup., 318 S.W.2d 289, 294 [1, 2]. 1965Tapley v. Dill, 358 Mo. 824 , 217 S.W.2d 369, 374 [10]; Commerce Trust Co. v. Weed, Mo.Sup., 318 S.W.2d 289, 294 [1, 2]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hahn v. Forest Hills Construction Company
green
1 sentence1970Hahn v. Forest Hills Const. Co., Mo.App., 334 S.W.2d 383 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Sanders v. Jones
green
2 sentences1955Sanders v. Jones, 347 Mo. 255 , 147 S.W.2d 424 ; Garrett v. Damron, Mo.Sup., 110 S.W.2d 1112 ; Tindall v. Tindall, 167 Mo. 218 , 66 S.W. 1092 . 1955Sanders v. Jones, 347 Mo. 255 , 147 S.W.2d 424 ; Garrett v. Damron, Mo.Sup., 110 S.W.2d 1112 ; Tindall v. Tindall, 167 Mo. 218 , 66 S.W. 1092 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.