People for a Rosario violation in New York

5 New York opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2007 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
People v. Buckleygreen ny · 1990 · cited in 2 New York opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995 2 sentences 1995The defendant’s contention that the court erred by failing to impose a sanction upon the People for a Rosario violation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Buckley, 75 NY2d 843 ; People v Reid, 192 AD2d 1117 ), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. 1993Defendant cannot rely upon an objection by codefendant’s counsel to preserve the issue (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Buckley, 75 NY2d 843, 846), and we decline to reach the issue in the interest of justice.	1	2
People v. Carracedogreen ny · 1997 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007“Where Rosario material is lost or destroyed, the court is required to impose an appropriate sanction that is designed to eliminate resulting prejudice to the defendant” (People v Carracedo, 89 NY2d 1059, 1062 [1997]).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
People v. Rosario green ny · 1961 2 sentences 2002The defendant’s contention on appeal that a new suppression hearing is warranted on the ground that the hearing court erred in failing to impose a sanction against the People for a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , cert denied 368 US 866 ) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 240.75; People v Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88 , lv denied 97 NY2d 658 ). 1997Further, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention that the court erroneously failed to impose appropriate sanctions upon the People for a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , cert denied 386 US 866 ).	3	1993–2002
Cummings v. Bennett green scotus · 1961 2 sentences 2002The defendant’s contention on appeal that a new suppression hearing is warranted on the ground that the hearing court erred in failing to impose a sanction against the People for a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , cert denied 368 US 866 ) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 240.75; People v Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88 , lv denied 97 NY2d 658 ). 1993Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for review his present contention that County Court abused its discretion by failing to impose a sanction upon the People for a Rosario violation (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , rearg denied 9 NY2d 908 , cert denied 368 US 866 , rearg denied 14 NY2d 876 , 15 NY2d 765 ).	2	1993–2002
People v. Suitte green nyappdiv · 1982 1 sentence 2002The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Goolsby, 213 AD2d 722 ; People v Taylor, 155 AD2d 630 ; People v Patterson, 106 AD2d 520 ; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).	1	2002–2002
People v. Patterson green nyappdiv · 1984 1 sentence 2002The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Goolsby, 213 AD2d 722 ; People v Taylor, 155 AD2d 630 ; People v Patterson, 106 AD2d 520 ; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).	1	2002–2002
People v. Taylor green nyappdiv · 1989 1 sentence 2002The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Goolsby, 213 AD2d 722 ; People v Taylor, 155 AD2d 630 ; People v Patterson, 106 AD2d 520 ; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).	1	2002–2002
People v. Goolsby green nyappdiv · 1995 1 sentence 2002The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Goolsby, 213 AD2d 722 ; People v Taylor, 155 AD2d 630 ; People v Patterson, 106 AD2d 520 ; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ).	1	2002–2002
People v. Sorbello green nyappdiv · 2001 1 sentence 2002The defendant’s contention on appeal that a new suppression hearing is warranted on the ground that the hearing court erred in failing to impose a sanction against the People for a Rosario violation (see, People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 , cert denied 368 US 866 ) is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, without merit (see, CPL 240.75; People v Sorbello, 285 AD2d 88 , lv denied 97 NY2d 658 ).	1	2002–2002
People v. Joseph green ny · 1995 1 sentence 1997The sanctions sought by the defendant were more drastic than the situation warranted (see, People v Joseph, 86 NY2d 565, 570 ; People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940 ).	1	1997–1997
People v. Martinez green ny · 1988 1 sentence 1997The sanctions sought by the defendant were more drastic than the situation warranted (see, People v Joseph, 86 NY2d 565, 570 ; People v Martinez, 71 NY2d 937, 940 ).	1	1997–1997
People v. Reid green nyappdiv · 1993 1 sentence 1995The defendant’s contention that the court erred by failing to impose a sanction upon the People for a Rosario violation is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Buckley, 75 NY2d 843 ; People v Reid, 192 AD2d 1117 ), and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.	1	1995–1995

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check