review of all relevant factors in Pennsylvania

5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Teodorski v. Teodorskigreen pasuperct · 2004 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014Id. at 1207 ; Teodorski v. Teodorski, 857 A.2d 194, 201 (Pa. Super. 2004); Miller v. Miller, 744 A.2d 778, 790-91 (Pa. Super 1999). 2014Id. at 1207; Teodorski v. Teodorski, 857 A.2d 194, 201 (Pa. Super. 2004).	2	2
Miller v. Millergreen pasuperct · 1999 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2001–2014 2 sentences 2014Id. at 1207 ; Teodorski v. Teodorski, 857 A.2d 194, 201 (Pa. Super. 2004); Miller v. Miller, 744 A.2d 778, 790-91 (Pa. Super 1999). 2001“Counsel fees are awarded on [a case-by-case basis following] a review of all relevant factors, including the payer’s ability to pay, the requesting party’s financial resources, the value of the services rendered, and the property received in equitable distribution.” Id.	1	2
Perlberger v. Perlbergergreen pasuperct · 1993 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 1 sentence 1999Id. at 1207.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Royal King Fisheries v. Fuszek green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2002In City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 546 Pa. 657 , 684 A.2d 558 , cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1155 , 117 S.Ct. 1334 , 137 L.Ed.2d 494 (1997), we explained the underlying reason why the Commission allocates costs to a railroad as owner of a rail line stating: At common law, when a private corporation constructed a railroad which made a bridge necessary at the crossing of’ a highway, imposed on the private corporation was the duty not only of constructing the bridge but also of maintaining the bridg	1	2002–2002
Stevedoring Services of America v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2002In City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 546 Pa. 657 , 684 A.2d 558 , cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1155 , 117 S.Ct. 1334 , 137 L.Ed.2d 494 (1997), we explained the underlying reason why the Commission allocates costs to a railroad as owner of a rail line stating: At common law, when a private corporation constructed a railroad which made a bridge necessary at the crossing of’ a highway, imposed on the private corporation was the duty not only of constructing the bridge but also of maintaining the bridg	1	2002–2002
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. City of Philadelphia green scotus · 1997 1 sentence 2002In City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 546 Pa. 657 , 684 A.2d 558 , cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1155 , 117 S.Ct. 1334 , 137 L.Ed.2d 494 (1997), we explained the underlying reason why the Commission allocates costs to a railroad as owner of a rail line stating: At common law, when a private corporation constructed a railroad which made a bridge necessary at the crossing of’ a highway, imposed on the private corporation was the duty not only of constructing the bridge but also of maintaining the bridg	1	2002–2002
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission green pacommwct · 1996 1 sentence 2002In City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 676 A.2d 1298 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 546 Pa. 657 , 684 A.2d 558 , cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1155 , 117 S.Ct. 1334 , 137 L.Ed.2d 494 (1997), we explained the underlying reason why the Commission allocates costs to a railroad as owner of a rail line stating: At common law, when a private corporation constructed a railroad which made a bridge necessary at the crossing of’ a highway, imposed on the private corporation was the duty not only of constructing the bridge but also of maintaining the bridg	1	2002–2002

Where else courts name it

PA 5 (1999–2014) TX 4 (2018–2024) NY 2 (1981–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check