Workman claim (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

Workman claim in Tennessee

5 Tennessee opinions name it 1 courts 1936–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Workman v. State green
tenn · 2001
2 sentences

2003In Workman , a petition for writ of error coram nobis was filed in the trial court, and the trial court specifically rejected Workman’s claim that due process required tolling of the statute of limitations. 41 S.W.3d at 101 .

2003In Workman, a petition for writ of error coram nobis was filed in the trial court, and the trial court specifically rejected Workman’s claim that due process required tolling of the statute of limitations. 41 S.W.3d at 101 .

22003–2003
Burford v. State green
tenn · 1992
2 sentences

2002Even granting for sake of argument that the one-year statute of limitations did not begin running until he actually came into possession of the evidence, Workman’s claim would still have been well beyond this “new” full limitations period.2 In essence, the Court’s decision in Workman can stand for three propositions: (1) that due process considerations can toll a statute of limitations even without evidence suggesting that the defendant was prevented by circumstances beyond his or her control from bringing a timely claim; (2) that due process considerations can toll a statute of limitations ev

2001The trial court rejected Workman's claim that the due process considerations discussed in Burford v. State, 845 S.W.2d 204 (Tenn.1992) require tolling of the statute of limitations.

22001–2002
Cripps's Case green
mass · 1914
1 sentence

1936Nor does a release by the workman bar dependent’s right to compensation.” In Cripps’ Case, 216 Mass., 586 , 104 N. E., 565 , Ann.

11936–1936

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-26-105 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 120 (1979–2026) MI 17 (2007–2026) TN 5 (1936–2003) OH 4 (1991–2015) VA 3 (2005–2013) CA 2 (2019–2019) KY 2 (2009–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check