Callfases claim in Washington

5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Callfas v. Department of Construction & Land Usegreen washctapp · 2005 · cited in 5 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2007–2013 2 sentences 2013The footnote in Birnbaum states: Califas stated, “Indeed, a permit applicant like the Callfases would have a claim under chapter 64.40 RCW for delay damages, as we noted above, without a writ once the tardy permit was issued.” Califas, 129 Wn. 2013The footnote in Birnbaum states: Callfas stated, "Indeed, a permit applicant like the Callfases would have a claim under chapter 64.40 RCW for delay damages, as we noted above, without a writ once the tardy permit was issued." Callfas, 129 Wn.	2	5

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 64.40.020 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 64.40.030 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 64.40.010 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check