37 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 2017–2026 27 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gates v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Specifically, Madera asserts for the first time on appeal that the admission of an “excessive number of photographic exhibits” at trial, including autopsy photographs, rendered the body camera footage cumulative and, thus, “unfairly prejudicial.” Because Madera did not object on this basis at trial, we review this claim only for plain error.3 See Gates v. State, 298 Ga. 324, 327 (3) ( 781 SE2d 772 ) (2016); OCGA § 24-1-103 (a), (d). 2024Specifically, Madera asserts for the first time on appeal that the admission of an “excessive number of photographic exhibits” at trial, including autopsy photographs, rendered the body camera footage cumulative and, thus, “unfairly prejudicial.” Because Madera did not object on this basis at trial, we review this claim only for plain error.3 See Gates v. State, 298 Ga. 324, 327 (3) reviewed the sufficiency of the evidence as a matter of constitutional due process, though many of us have questioned the soundness of that approach. | 5 | 6 |
Goins v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Goins v. State, 310 Ga. 199, 204 (4) ( 850 SE2d 68 ) (2020); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). 2023See Goins v. State, 310 Ga. 199, 204 (4) ( 850 SE2d 68 ) (2020); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). | 3 | 3 |
Grullon v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See Grullon v. State, 313 Ga. 40 , 44–45 (2021); OCGA § 17-8-58. 2026See Grullon v. State, 313 Ga. 40 , 44–45 (2021); OCGA § 17-8-58. | 2 | 2 |
Render v. Stategreen2 sentences2026See Render v. State, 320 Ga. 890, 899 (2025). 2026See Render v. State, 320 Ga. 890, 899 (2025). | 2 | 2 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See White v. State, 291 Ga. 7, 8 (2) ( 727 SE2d 109 ) (2012). 2024See White v. State, 291 Ga. 7, 8 (2) ( 727 SE2d 109 ) (2012). | 2 | 2 |
Mann v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See Mann v. State, 307 Ga. 696, 704 (2) (e) (838 SE2d 305) (2020). 2023See Mann v. State, 307 Ga. 696, 704 (2) (e) (838 SE2d 305) (2020). | 2 | 2 |
Ash v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b); Ash v. State, 312 Ga. 771, 791 (5) (a) (865 SE2d 150) (2021). 2023See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b); Ash v. State, 312 Ga. 771, 791 (5) (a) (865 SE2d 150) (2021). | 2 | 2 |
Dubose v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b). 7 *318 To show plain error, Parker "must establish not only that the jury instruction was erroneous, but also that it was obviously so and that it likely affected the outcome of the proceedings." DuBose v. State , 299 Ga. 652 , 654 (4), 791 S.E.2d 9 (2016) (citation and punctuation omitted). 2019See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b). 7 *318 To show plain error, Parker "must establish not only that the jury instruction was erroneous, but also that it was obviously so and that it likely affected the outcome of the proceedings." DuBose v. State , 299 Ga. 652 , 654 (4), 791 S.E.2d 9 (2016) (citation and punctuation omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Parks v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Parks v. State , 300 Ga. 303 , 309 (4), 794 S.E.2d 623 (2016). 2018See Parks v. State , 300 Ga. 303 , 309 (4), 794 S.E.2d 623 (2016). | 2 | 2 |
Walker v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Walker v. State, 301 Ga. 482, 487 (3) ( 801 SE2d 804 ) (2017); Lupoe, 300 Ga. at 247 (11). 2017See Walker v. State, 301 Ga. 482, 487 (3) ( 801 SE2d 804 ) (2017); Lupoe, 300 Ga. at 247 (11). | 2 | 2 |
Lupoe v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See Walker v. State, 301 Ga. 482, 487 (3) ( 801 SE2d 804 ) (2017); Lupoe, 300 Ga. at 247 (11). 2017See Walker v. State, 301 Ga. 482, 487 (3) ( 801 SE2d 804 ) (2017); Lupoe, 300 Ga. at 247 (11). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Herrera-Bustamantegreen2 sentences2026See OCGA § 24-1-103(d); State v. Herrera-Bustamante, 304 Ga. 259 , 263–64 (2018). 2026See OCGA § 24-1-103(d); State v. Herrera-Bustamante, 304 Ga. 259 , 263–64 (2018). | 1 | 3 |
Cheddersingh v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Cheddersingh v. State, 290 Ga. 680 , 682–83 (2012); OCGA § 17-8-58. | 1 | 1 |
Wood v. Stategreen1 sentence2026See Wood v. State, 320 Ga. 466, 471 (2024); OCGA § 24-1-103(d). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Because Turner did not object to its admission at trial we review this claim only for plain error, see Moore v. State, 305 Ga. 251, 255 (2) (b) ( 824 SE2d 377 ) (2019), and we find none. 2025Because Turner did not object to its admission at trial we review this claim only for plain error, see Moore v. State, 305 Ga. 251, 255 (2) (b) ( 824 SE2d 377 ) (2019), and we find none. | 1 | 1 |
Dunbar v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Dunbar v. State, 309 Ga. 252, 256 (3) ( 845 SE2d 607 ) (2020) (“Because she did not object to the trial court on the constitutional grounds she now raises, we review this evidentiary claim only for plain error.”). 2025See Dunbar v. State, 309 Ga. 252, 256 (3) ( 845 SE2d 607 ) (2020) (“Because she did not object to the trial court on the constitutional grounds she now raises, we review this evidentiary claim only for plain error.”). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Hill v. State, 310 Ga. 180, 194 (2020); OCGA § 17-8-58(b). 4 To prevail on plain-error review, an appellant must show that the alleged instructional error was not affirmatively waived; was clear and obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute; likely affected the outcome of the trial; and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. | 1 | 1 |
McIver v. Stategreen1 sentence2025“To establish plain error, the appellant must show that he did not affirmatively waive the error, that the error is clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute, that it affected his substantial rights, and that it seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” McIver v. State, 321 Ga. 565, 575 (2) (b) ( 915 SE2d 882 ) (2025) (citation and punctuation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Leonard v. Stategreen2 sentences2025See Leonard v. State, 316 Ga. 827, 834 (3) (889 SE2d 837) (2023); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). 2025See Leonard v. State, 316 Ga. 827, 834 (3) ( 889 SE2d 837 ) (2023); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). | 1 | 1 |
Wilkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See Wilkins v. State, 308 Ga. 131, 139 (839 SE2d 525) (2020) (explaining that this Court will “generally deem harmless a jury instruction that indicates that a defendant could be found guilty under a theory for which there was no evidence or even argument”). (c) Because Campbell and Parrish did not object to the deliberate ignorance instruction after it was given at trial, we review this claim only for plain error. 2024See Wilkins v. State, 308 Ga. 131, 139 (839 SE2d 525) (2020) (explaining that this Court will “generally deem harmless a jury instruction that indicates that a defendant could be found guilty under a theory for which there was no evidence or even argument”). (c) Because Campbell and Parrish did not object to the deliberate ignorance instruction after it was given at trial, we review this claim only for plain error. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kellygreen2 sentences2024See State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 31-32 (1) (718 SE2d 232) (2011). 2024See State v. Kelly, 290 Ga. 29, 31-32 (1) (718 SE2d 232) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen2 sentences2024See King v. State, 316 Ga. 611, 616 (2) n.8 (889 SE2d 851) (2023). 2024See King v. State, 316 Ga. 611, 616 (2) n.8 (889 SE2d 851) (2023). | 1 | 1 |
Atkins v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b). 14 “In deciding whether a verdict form accurately presented the law and properly guided the jury, this Court reviews the language of the form along with the trial court’s instructions to the jury.” Atkins v. State, 310 Ga. 246, 252 (3) ( 850 SE2d 103 ) (2020). [A] verdict form is erroneous when the form would mislead jurors of reasonable understanding, or the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the presumption of innocence, the State’s burden of proof, the possible verdicts that could be returned, or how the verdict should be entered on the printed form. 2023See OCGA § 17-8-58 (b). 14 “In deciding whether a verdict form accurately presented the law and properly guided the jury, this Court reviews the language of the form along with the trial court’s instructions to the jury.” Atkins v. State, 310 Ga. 246, 252 (3) ( 850 SE2d 103 ) (2020). [A] verdict form is erroneous when the form would mislead jurors of reasonable understanding, or the trial court erroneously instructed the jury on the presumption of innocence, the State’s burden of proof, the possible verdicts that could be returned, or how the verdict should be entered on the printed form. | 1 | 1 |
McKinney v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See McKinney v. State, 307 Ga. 129, 133 (834 SE2d 741) (2019); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). 2021See McKinney v. State, 307 Ga. 129, 133 ( 834 SE2d 741 ) (2019); OCGA § 24-1-103 (d). | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See Williams, supra, 302 Ga. at 151-152 . 2021See Williams, supra, 302 Ga. at 151-152. | 1 | 1 |
Brewner v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See Brewner v. State, 302 Ga. 6, 12 (III) (804 SE2d 94) (2017) (plain error review where appellant did not assert any objection when other acts evidence was first introduced at trial). 2021See Brewner v. State, 302 Ga. 6, 12 (III) (804 SE2d 94) (2017) (plain error review where appellant did not assert any objection when other acts evidence was first introduced at trial). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2020See Jackson v. State, 305 Ga. 614, 618 (2) ( 825 SE2d 188 ) (2019). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2020See Jackson v. State, 305 Ga. 614, 618 (2) ( 825 SE2d 188 ) (2019). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.