35 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. Blagojevichgreen2 sentences2024“A -7- party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objecti 2024“A party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objectionab | 8 | 10 |
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finleygreen2 sentences2020Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “ ‘[f]acial invalidation “is, manifestly, strong medicine” that “has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” ’ ” Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). 2019Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “facial invalidation is, manifestly, strong medicine that has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). | 6 | 7 |
Napleton v. Village of Hinsdalegreen2 sentences2024“A -7- party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objecti 2024“A party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objectionab | 5 | 12 |
Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cookgreen2 sentences2020Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “ ‘[f]acial invalidation “is, manifestly, strong medicine” that “has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” ’ ” Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). 2019Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “facial invalidation is, manifestly, strong medicine that has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). | 5 | 7 |
Broadrick v. Oklahomagreen2 sentences2020Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “ ‘[f]acial invalidation “is, manifestly, strong medicine” that “has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” ’ ” Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). 2019Since a successful facial challenge will void the statute for all parties in all contexts, “facial invalidation is, manifestly, strong medicine that has been employed by the court sparingly and only as a last resort.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Pooh-Bah Enterprises, Inc. v. County of Cook, 232 Ill. 2d 463, 473 (2009) (quoting National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569, 580 (1998), quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613 (1973)). | 5 | 6 |
The Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Floresgreen2 sentences2019People v. Harris, 2018 IL 121932, ¶ 38 . “ ‘The fact that the statute might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances is insufficient to render it wholly invalid.’ ” Rizzo, 2016 IL 118599, ¶ 24 (quoting Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores, 2013 IL 112673, ¶ 33 ). 2018People v. Harris , 2018 IL 121932 , ¶ 38, 427 Ill.Dec. 833 , 120 N.E.3d 900 . " 'The fact that the statute might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances is insufficient to render it wholly invalid.' " Rizzo , 2016 IL 118599 , ¶ 24, 406 Ill.Dec. 488 , 61 N.E.3d 92 (quoting Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores , 2013 IL 112673 , ¶ 33, 372 Ill.Dec. 255 , 991 N.E.2d 745 ). | 2 | 5 |
People v. Garvingreen2 sentences2024Id. at 117 . 2007People v. Garvin, 219 Ill. 2d 104, 117 (2006). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Rizzogreen2 sentences2019People v. Harris, 2018 IL 121932, ¶ 38 . “ ‘The fact that the statute might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances is insufficient to render it wholly invalid.’ ” Rizzo, 2016 IL 118599, ¶ 24 (quoting Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores, 2013 IL 112673, ¶ 33 ). 2018People v. Harris , 2018 IL 121932 , ¶ 38, 427 Ill.Dec. 833 , 120 N.E.3d 900 . " 'The fact that the statute might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances is insufficient to render it wholly invalid.' " Rizzo , 2016 IL 118599 , ¶ 24, 406 Ill.Dec. 488 , 61 N.E.3d 92 (quoting Hope Clinic for Women, Ltd. v. Flores , 2013 IL 112673 , ¶ 33, 372 Ill.Dec. 255 , 991 N.E.2d 745 ). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Huddlestongreen2 sentences2016“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . “ ‘ “[S]o long as there exists a situation in which a statute could be validly applied, a facial challenge must fail.” ’ ” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 537 (quoting People v. Huddleston, 212 Ill. 2d 107, 145 (2004), quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002)). ¶ 30 I. 2015“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . “ ‘ “[S]o long as there exists a situation in which a statute could be validly applied, a facial challenge must fail.” ’ ” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 537 (quoting People v. Huddleston, 212 Ill. 2d 107, 145 (2004), quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002)). ¶ 30 I. | 2 | 2 |
Hill v. Cowangreen2 sentences2016“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . “ ‘ “[S]o long as there exists a situation in which a statute could be validly applied, a facial challenge must fail.” ’ ” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 537 (quoting People v. Huddleston, 212 Ill. 2d 107, 145 (2004), quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002)). ¶ 30 I. 2015“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . “ ‘ “[S]o long as there exists a situation in which a statute could be validly applied, a facial challenge must fail.” ’ ” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 537 (quoting People v. Huddleston, 212 Ill. 2d 107, 145 (2004), quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002)). ¶ 30 I. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Grecogreen2 sentences2006People v. Greco, 204 Ill. 2d 400, 407 (2003). 2006People v. Greco, 204 Ill. 2d 400, 407 (2003). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Harris
green
2 sentences2024“A -7- party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objecti 2024“A party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objectionab | 5 | 2018–2024 |
In Re MT
green
2 sentences2017“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . ¶ 16 D. 2016“The invalidity of the statute in one particular set of circumstances is insufficient to prove its facial invalidity.” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 536-37 . “ ‘ “[S]o long as there exists a situation in which a statute could be validly applied, a facial challenge must fail.” ’ ” In re M.T., 221 Ill. 2d at 537 (quoting People v. Huddleston, 212 Ill. 2d 107, 145 (2004), quoting Hill v. Cowan, 202 Ill. 2d 151, 157 (2002)). ¶ 30 I. | 3 | 2015–2017 |
People v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2024“A -7- party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objecti 2024“A party raising a facial challenge must establish that the statute is unconstitutional under any possible set of facts, while an as-applied challenge requires a showing that the statute is unconstitutional as it applies to the specific facts and circumstances of the challenging party.” Id. “[I]n an ‘as applied’ challenge a plaintiff protests against how an enactment was applied in the particular context in which the plaintiff acted or proposed to act.” Napleton v. Village of Hinsdale, 229 Ill. 2d 296, 306 (2008). “[I]f a plaintiff prevails in an as-applied claim, he may enjoin the objectionab | 2 | 2024–2024 |
City of L. A. v. Patel
green
2 sentences2021Id. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2450 . ¶ 47 The Court then addressed the City’s argument that statutes authorizing warrantless searches will never satisfy the requirement for a successful facial challenge that the law must be invalid in all its applications. 2021Id. at ___, 135 S. Ct. at 2450 . ¶ 47 The Court then addressed the City’s argument that statutes authorizing warrantless searches will never satisfy the requirement for a successful facial challenge that the law must be invalid in all its applications. | 2 | 2019–2021 |
People v. Holman
red
2 sentences2018People v. Holman , 2017 IL 120655 , ¶ 29, 418 Ill.Dec. 889 , 91 N.E.3d 849 . 2018People v. Holman , 2017 IL 120655 , ¶ 29, 418 Ill.Dec. 889 , 91 N.E.3d 849 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Jackson v. City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2014Jackson v. City of Chicago, 2012 IL App (1st) 111044, ¶ 25 . 2014Id. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Kopf v. Kelly
green
1 sentence2025Id. ¶ 14 Here, plaintiff framed its claim in terms of its individual circumstances, but the circuit court broadened its ruling to encompass everyone residing or injured outside of the two named counties. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.