34 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hedgergreen2 sentences2015State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 600 , 768 P.2d 1331, 1333 (1989). 2015State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 600 , 768 P.2d 1331, 1333 (1989). | 20 | 23 |
Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.green2 sentences2014Sun Valley Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. Idaho Power *744 Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991). 2014Sun Valley Shopping Ctr., Inc. v. Idaho Power *744 Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991). | 6 | 6 |
State v. Herreragreen2 sentences2025State v. Herrera, 164 Idaho 261 , 270, 429 P.3d 149, 158 (2018). 2025State v. Herrera, 164 Idaho 261 , 270, 429 P.3d 149, 158 (2018). | 4 | 4 |
Associates Northwest, Inc. v. Beetsgreen2 sentences1994State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598 , 768 P.2d 1331 (1989), citing Associates Northwest v. Beets, 112 Idaho 603 , 733 P.2d 824 (Ct.App.1987). 1994State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598 , 768 P.2d 1331 (1989), citing Associates Northwest v. Beets, 112 Idaho 603 , 733 P.2d 824 (Ct.App.1987). | 1 | 2 |
Lee v. Nickersongreen2 sentences2012See Lee v. Nickerson, 146 Idaho 5, 9 , 189 P.3d 467, 471 (2008) (citing State Ins. 2012See Lee v. Nickerson, 146 Idaho 5, 9 , 189 P.3d 467, 471 (2008) (citing State Ins. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Grubegreen2 sentences2002State v. Grube, 126 Idaho 377, 381 , 883 P.2d 1069, 1073 (1994); State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 600 , 768 P.2d 1331, 1333 (1989). 2002State v. Grube, 126 Idaho 377, 381 , 883 P.2d 1069, 1073 (1994); State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 600 , 768 P.2d 1331, 1333 (1989). | 1 | 1 |
Kleine v. Fred Meyer, Inc.green2 sentences2000Herndon, a Prof'l Ass’n, 107 Idaho 1, 2 , 684 P.2d 978, 979 (1984); Kleine v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 124 Idaho 44, 47 , 855 P.2d 881, 884 (Ct.App.1992); Fish Haven Resort, Inc., supra. When such a discretionary decision is reviewed on appeal, the appellate court conducts a multitiered inquiry to determine: (1) whether the lower court correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) whether the lower court acted within the boundaries of such discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to the specific choices before it; and (3) whether the court reached its decision by an e 2000Herndon, a Prof'l Ass’n, 107 Idaho 1, 2 , 684 P.2d 978, 979 (1984); Kleine v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 124 Idaho 44, 47 , 855 P.2d 881, 884 (Ct.App.1992); Fish Haven Resort, Inc., supra. When such a discretionary decision is reviewed on appeal, the appellate court conducts a multitiered inquiry to determine: (1) whether the lower court correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) whether the lower court acted within the boundaries of such discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to the specific choices before it; and (3) whether the court reached its decision by an e | 1 | 1 |
Southern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. Astorquiagreen2 sentences2000Sun Valley Shopping Ctr. v. Idaho Power Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991); Roe v. Doe, 129 Idaho 663, 666 , 931 P.2d 657, 660 (Ct.App.1996); Kleine, supra. In fashioning sanctions, a trial court should “balance the equities by comparing the culpability of the disobedient party with the resulting prejudice to the innocent party.” Roe, 129 Idaho at 668 , 931 P.2d at 662 (quoting Astorquia, 113 Idaho at 532 , 746 P.2d at 991 (Donaldson, J., concurring)). 2000Sun Valley Shopping Ctr. v. Idaho Power Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991); Roe v. Doe, 129 Idaho 663, 666 , 931 P.2d 657, 660 (Ct.App.1996); Kleine, supra. In fashioning sanctions, a trial court should “balance the equities by comparing the culpability of the disobedient party with the resulting prejudice to the innocent party.” Roe, 129 Idaho at 668 , 931 P.2d at 662 (quoting Astorquia, 113 Idaho at 532 , 746 P.2d at 991 (Donaldson, J., concurring)). | 1 | 1 |
Roe v. Doegreen2 sentences2000Sun Valley Shopping Ctr. v. Idaho Power Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991); Roe v. Doe, 129 Idaho 663, 666 , 931 P.2d 657, 660 (Ct.App.1996); Kleine, supra. In fashioning sanctions, a trial court should “balance the equities by comparing the culpability of the disobedient party with the resulting prejudice to the innocent party.” Roe, 129 Idaho at 668 , 931 P.2d at 662 (quoting Astorquia, 113 Idaho at 532 , 746 P.2d at 991 (Donaldson, J., concurring)). 2000Sun Valley Shopping Ctr. v. Idaho Power Co., 119 Idaho 87, 94 , 803 P.2d 993, 1000 (1991); Roe v. Doe, 129 Idaho 663, 666 , 931 P.2d 657, 660 (Ct.App.1996); Kleine, supra. In fashioning sanctions, a trial court should “balance the equities by comparing the culpability of the disobedient party with the resulting prejudice to the innocent party.” Roe, 129 Idaho at 668 , 931 P.2d at 662 (quoting Astorquia, 113 Idaho at 532 , 746 P.2d at 991 (Donaldson, J., concurring)). | 1 | 1 |
Devault v. Steven L. Herndongreen2 sentences2000Herndon, a Prof'l Ass’n, 107 Idaho 1, 2 , 684 P.2d 978, 979 (1984); Kleine v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 124 Idaho 44, 47 , 855 P.2d 881, 884 (Ct.App.1992); Fish Haven Resort, Inc., supra. When such a discretionary decision is reviewed on appeal, the appellate court conducts a multitiered inquiry to determine: (1) whether the lower court correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) whether the lower court acted within the boundaries of such discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to the specific choices before it; and (3) whether the court reached its decision by an e 2000Herndon, a Prof'l Ass’n, 107 Idaho 1, 2 , 684 P.2d 978, 979 (1984); Kleine v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 124 Idaho 44, 47 , 855 P.2d 881, 884 (Ct.App.1992); Fish Haven Resort, Inc., supra. When such a discretionary decision is reviewed on appeal, the appellate court conducts a multitiered inquiry to determine: (1) whether the lower court correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion; (2) whether the lower court acted within the boundaries of such discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to the specific choices before it; and (3) whether the court reached its decision by an e | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.