claim of sovereign immunity in Arkansas

2008Id. *Page 4 (Emphasis added.) Accord Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Burnett , 340 Ark. 233 , 12 S.W.3d 191 (2000); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock Poultry Comm'n , 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Fireman's Ins.

2007Id.

2025Id. at 7, 641 S.W.3d at 42 .

2024Id. at 7, 641 S.W.3d at 42 .

2018This court has recognized that a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted in the following three instances: (1) when the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) when an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) when the state agency is acting illegally or if a state agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute. 2018 Ark. 12 , at 5-6, 535 S.W.3d 616 (internal citations omitted).

2018This court has recognized that a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted in the following three instances: (1) when the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) when an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) when the state agency is acting illegally or if a state agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute. 2018 Ark. 12 , at 5-6, 535 S.W.3d 616 (internal citations omitted).

2017Mitchem, 2014 Ark. 233, at 3-5 , 2014 WL 2019278 .

2014This court has recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: when the State is the moving party seeking specific relief, when an act of the 3 Cite as 2014 Ark. 233 legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity, and when the state agency is acting illegally or if a state-agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute.

2016Article 5, § 20 of the Arkansas Constitution states, “The State of Arkansas shall never be made a defendant in any of her courts.” In Arkansas Department of Human Services. v. Fort Smith School District, 2015 Ark. 81, at 6-7 , 455 S.W.3d 294, 299 , we stated: This court has recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be waived: - (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an- act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state agency is acting illegally or if a state-agency officer refuses to d

2016Article 5, § 20 of the Arkansas Constitution states, “The State of Arkansas shall never be made a defendant in any of her courts.” In Arkansas Department of Human Services. v. Fort Smith School District, 2015 Ark. 81, at 6-7 , 455 S.W.3d 294, 299 , we stated: This court has recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be waived: - (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an- act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state agency is acting illegally or if a state-agency officer refuses to d

2013Eddings, 2011 Ark. 47 , at 6 n. 2, 378 S.W.3d at 698 n. 2 (citing Short v. Westark Cmty. Coll., 347 Ark. 497, 504 , 65 S.W.3d 440, 445 (2002); LandsnPulaski, 372 Ark. at 43 , 269 S.W.3d at 795 ).

2013Eddings, 2011 Ark. 47 , at 6 n. 2, 378 S.W.3d at 698 n. 2 (citing Short v. Westark Cmty. Coll., 347 Ark. 497, 504 , 65 S.W.3d 440, 445 (2002); LandsnPulaski, 372 Ark. at 43 , 269 S.W.3d at 795 ).

2022Id., 628 S.W.3d at 635 .

2022Id., 628 S.W.3d at 635 .

2021Id.

2017Id.; Burcham, supra. We have recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state agency is acting illegally, unconstitutionally, or a state-agency officer refuses to do a 8 Cite as 2017 Ark. 209 purely ministerial action required by statute.

2016This court has recognized three ways 9 Cite as 2016 Ark. 268 in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; or (3) the state agency is acting illegally, unconstitutionally, or if a state-agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute.

2016Furthermore, an order denying a motion for a protective order may be appealed on an 36 Cite as 2016 Ark. 268 interlocutory basis.

2015We have recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state 5 Cite as 2015 Ark. 462 agency is acting illegally, unconstitutionally, or if a state-agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute.1 See Duit I, 2014 Ark. 432 , 445 S.W.3d 496 .

2015We have recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an act of the legislature has created .a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state | fiagency is acting illegally, unconstitutionally, or if a state-agency officer refuses .to do a, purely ministerial action required by statute. 1 See Duit I, 2014 Ark. 432 , 445 S.W.3d 496 .

2015We have recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific relief; (2) where an act of the legislature has created .a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state | fiagency is acting illegally, unconstitutionally, or if a state-agency officer refuses .to do a, purely ministerial action required by statute. 1 See Duit I, 2014 Ark. 432 , 445 S.W.3d 496 .

2014See Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Arkansas v. Burcham, 2014 Ark. 61 , 2014 WL 585981 ; Arkansas Dep’t of Cmty. Corr., 2013 Ark. 36 , 425 S.W.3d 731 ; Arkansas Tech Univ. v. Link, 341 Ark. 495 , 17 S.W.3d 809 (2000).

2014See Board of Trustees of the Univ. of Arkansas v. Burcham, 2014 Ark. 61 , 2014 WL 585981 ; Arkansas Dep’t of Cmty. Corr., 2013 Ark. 36 , 425 S.W.3d 731 ; Arkansas Tech Univ. v. Link, 341 Ark. 495 , 17 S.W.3d 809 (2000).

2014“This court has recognized three ways in which a claim of sovereign immunity may be surmounted: (1) where the State is the moving party seeking specific 24 Cite as 2014 Ark. 519 relief; (2) where an act of the legislature has created a specific waiver of sovereign immunity; and (3) where the state agency is acting illegally or if a state agency officer refuses to do a purely ministerial action required by statute.” Ark.

2008Id. *Page 4 (Emphasis added.) Accord Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Burnett , 340 Ark. 233 , 12 S.W.3d 191 (2000); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock Poultry Comm'n , 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Fireman's Ins.

2008Id. *Page 4 (Emphasis added.) Accord Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Burnett , 340 Ark. 233 , 12 S.W.3d 191 (2000); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock Poultry Comm'n , 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Fireman's Ins.

2008Id. *Page 4 (Emphasis added.) Accord Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Burnett , 340 Ark. 233 , 12 S.W.3d 191 (2000); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock Poultry Comm'n , 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Fireman's Ins.

2008Id. *Page 4 (Emphasis added.) Accord Arkansas Public Defender Commission v. Burnett , 340 Ark. 233 , 12 S.W.3d 191 (2000); Cross v. Arkansas Livestock Poultry Comm'n , 328 Ark. 255 , 943 S.W.2d 230 (1997); Fireman's Ins.