broadside exception in North Carolina

33 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
In Re Beasleygreen ncctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2003–2015 2 sentences 2015See In re Beasley, 147 N.C. 2003The scope of appellate review is limited to issues presented by assignments of error in the record on appeal and, if one of those issues includes a broadside exception, it “does not present for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the entire body of the findings of fact.” In re Beasley, 147 N.C.	2	2
Hicks v. Russellgreen nc · 1961 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1962–2003 2 sentences 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C. 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C.	1	2
State v. McKinneygreen ncctapp · 1973 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981 1 sentence 1981See State v. McKinney, 19 N.C.	1	1
City of Kings Mountain v. Clinegreen nc · 1972 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976 2 sentences 1976It presents these questions only: (1) Do the facts found support the judgment, and (2) does error of law appear on the face of the record.” City of Kings Mountain v. Cline, 281 N.C. 269, 274 , 188 S.E. 2d 284, 287 (1972). 1976It presents these questions only: (1) Do the facts found support the judgment, and (2) does error of law appear on the face of the record.” City of Kings Mountain v. Cline, 281 N.C. 269, 274 , 188 S.E. 2d 284, 287 (1972).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (37)

Case	Cited	Years
Lewis v. Parker neutral nc · 1966 2 sentences 1974Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 . 1974Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 .	3	1969–1974
Kovacs v. Brewer neutral nc · 1957 2 sentences 1961Logan v. Sprinkle, post 41; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Kovacs v. Brewer, 245 N.C. 630 , 97 S.E. 2d 96 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 1961Logan v. Sprinkle, post 41; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Kovacs v. Brewer, 245 N.C. 630 , 97 S.E. 2d 96 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 .	3	1959–1961
Weaver v. Morgan neutral nc · 1950 2 sentences 1959In Weaver v. Morgan, 232 N.C. 642 , 61 S. E. 2d 916 , this Court said: “The exception in' the- easefin.'•hand-is ‘to the foregoing findings of fact and judgment.’ This, as to findings of fact, is a broadside exception. 1959In Weaver v. Morgan, 232 N.C. 642 , 61 S. E. 2d 916 , this Court said: “The exception in' the- easefin.'•hand-is ‘to the foregoing findings of fact and judgment.’ This, as to findings of fact, is a broadside exception.	3	1959–1959
Merrell v. Jenkins green nc · 1955 2 sentences 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C. 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C.	2	1961–1962
Putnam v. Triangle Publications, Inc. green nc · 1957 2 sentences 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C. 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C.	2	1961–1962
Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc. neutral nc · 1941 2 sentences 1946In Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N. C., 468 , 14 S. E. (2d), 427 , it was said: “This defendant excepts 'to the rulings of the court and findings of fact upon which the judgment was signed.’ His assignment of error is 'that the court erred in its rulings and findings of fact.’ This is a broadside exception arid assignment of error. 1946In Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N. C., 468 , 14 S. E. (2d), 427 , it was said: “This defendant excepts 'to the rulings of the court and findings of fact upon which the judgment was signed.’ His assignment of error is 'that the court erred in its rulings and findings of fact.’ This is a broadside exception arid assignment of error.	2	1946–1953
Davis v. Keen. neutral · 1906 2 sentences 1939Davis v. Keen, supra , and Jackson v. Lumber Co., Supra . 1939Davis v. Keen, supra, and Jackson v. Lumber Co., supra. A reading of the rather voluminous record and a careful examination of each exception preserved leave us with the impression that the case has been tried in a fair and impartial manner.	2	1939–1939
McKinnon v. . Morrison neutral nc · 1889 2 sentences 1931Fourteen exceptions were apparently noted throughout the trial, the last being: “The defendant assigns as error the judge’s charge.” It was said in McKinnon v. Morrison, 104 N. C., 354 , 10 S. E., 513 , that a broadside exception “to the charge as given” would not be considered. 1931Fourteen exceptions were apparently noted throughout the trial, the last being: “The defendant assigns as error the judge’s charge.” It was said in McKinnon v. Morrison, 104 N. C., 354 , 10 S. E., 513 , that a broadside exception “to the charge as given” would not be considered.	2	1895–1931
Mayhew Electric Co. v. Carras green ncctapp · 1976 1 sentence 1985Mayhew Electric Co. v. Carras, 29 N.C.	1	1985–1985
State v. Coffey green nc · 1976 2 sentences 1981State v. Coffey, 289 N.C. 431 , 222 S.E.2d 217 (1976); State v. Kirby, supra, 276 N.C. 123 , 171 S.E.2d 416 . 1981State v. Coffey, 289 N.C. 431 , 222 S.E.2d 217 (1976); State v. Kirby, supra, 276 N.C. 123 , 171 S.E.2d 416 .	1	1981–1981
State v. Kirby green nc · 1970 2 sentences 1981State v. Coffey, 289 N.C. 431 , 222 S.E.2d 217 (1976); State v. Kirby, supra, 276 N.C. 123 , 171 S.E.2d 416 . 1981State v. Coffey, 289 N.C. 431 , 222 S.E.2d 217 (1976); State v. Kirby, supra, 276 N.C. 123 , 171 S.E.2d 416 .	1	1981–1981
State v. Freeman green nc · 1978 2 sentences 1980State v. Freeman, 295 N.C. 210 , 244 S.E. 2d 680 (1978). 1980State v. Freeman, 295 N.C. 210 , 244 S.E. 2d 680 (1978).	1	1980–1980
Sweet v. Martin green ncctapp · 1972 1 sentence 1972Sweet v. Martin, 13 N.C.	1	1972–1972
State v. Evers neutral ncctapp · 1968 2 sentences 1970This is a broadside exception and will not be sustained, State v. Evers, 1 N.C. 1970App. 81 , 159 S.E. 2d 372 (1968); furthermore, the entire charge was not brought forward in the record on appeal; therefore, it will be presumed that the charge was correct.	1	1970–1970
State v. Haddock neutral nc · 1961 2 sentences 1969State v. Haddock, 254 N.C. 162 , 118 S.E. 2d 411 (1961); State v. McCaskill, 270 N.C. 788 , 154 S.E. 2d 907 (1967); Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 (1966). 1969State v. Haddock, 254 N.C. 162 , 118 S.E. 2d 411 (1961); State v. McCaskill, 270 N.C. 788 , 154 S.E. 2d 907 (1967); Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 (1966).	1	1969–1969
State v. McCaskill green nc · 1967 2 sentences 1969State v. Haddock, 254 N.C. 162 , 118 S.E. 2d 411 (1961); State v. McCaskill, 270 N.C. 788 , 154 S.E. 2d 907 (1967); Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 (1966). 1969State v. Haddock, 254 N.C. 162 , 118 S.E. 2d 411 (1961); State v. McCaskill, 270 N.C. 788 , 154 S.E. 2d 907 (1967); Lewis v. Parker, 268 N.C. 436 , 150 S.E. 2d 729 (1966).	1	1969–1969
State v. . Dilliard green nc · 1943 2 sentences 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 . 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 .	1	1968–1968
State v. . Biggerstaff green nc · 1946 2 sentences 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 . 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 .	1	1968–1968
State v. . Anderson green nc · 1948 2 sentences 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 . 1968State v. Biggerstajf, 226 N.C. 603 , 39 S.E. 2d 619 ; State v. Anderson, 228 N.C. 720 , 47 S.E. 2d 1 ; State v. Dillard, 223 N.C. 446 , 27 S.E. 2d 85 .	1	1968–1968
State v. Woolard neutral nc · 1963 2 sentences 1967S. v. Woolard, 260 N.C. 133 , 132 S.E. 2d 364 . 1967S. v. Woolard, 260 N.C. 133 , 132 S.E. 2d 364 .	1	1967–1967
City & County of San Francisco v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. green scotus · 1956 1 sentence 1962La. 1957); State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; State v. McPeak, 243 N.C. 243 , 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 . .The exception to the charge fails to point out specifically the part of the charge challenged, is a broadside exception and is ineffectual.	1	1962–1962
State v. McPeak green nc · 1955 2 sentences 1962La. 1957); State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; State v. McPeak, 243 N.C. 243 , 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 . .The exception to the charge fails to point out specifically the part of the charge challenged, is a broadside exception and is ineffectual. 1962La. 1957); State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; State v. McPeak, 243 N.C. 243 , 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 . .The exception to the charge fails to point out specifically the part of the charge challenged, is a broadside exception and is ineffectual.	1	1962–1962
Logan v. Sprinkle green nc · 1961 2 sentences 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C. 1962Hicks v. Russell, 256 N.C. 34 , 123 S.E. 2d 214 ; Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41 , 123 S.E 2d 209; Putnam v. Publications, 245 N.C. 432 , 96 S.E. 2d 445 ; Merrell v. Jenkins, 242 N.C. 636 , 89 S.E. 2d 242 . 293 This Court has consistently held that an “exception must be made to a particular finding of fact and point out specifically the alleged error, and an exception to the findings of fact and the conclusions of law based thereon, is a broadside exception and ineffectual.” Strong’s N. C.	1	1962–1962
State v. Coffey green nc · 1961 2 sentences 1962La. 1957); State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; State v. McPeak, 243 N.C. 243 , 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 . .The exception to the charge fails to point out specifically the part of the charge challenged, is a broadside exception and is ineffectual. 1962La. 1957); State v. Coffey, 255 N.C. 293 , 121 S.E. 2d 736 ; State v. McPeak, 243 N.C. 243 , 90 S.E. 2d 501 , cert. den. 351 U.S. 919 . .The exception to the charge fails to point out specifically the part of the charge challenged, is a broadside exception and is ineffectual.	1	1962–1962
State v. Jones green nc · 1958 2 sentences 1962State v. Jones, 249 N.C. 134 , 105 S.E. 2d 513 . 1962State v. Jones, 249 N.C. 134 , 105 S.E. 2d 513 .	1	1962–1962
State v. Triplett green nc · 1953	1	1959–1959
City of Hickory v. Catawba County green nc · 1934	1	1959–1959
State v. . Webster green · 1940	1	1959–1959
Tillman v. Talbert green nc · 1956 2 sentences 1959S. v. Webster, 218 N.C. 692 , 12 S.E. 2d 272 ; S. v. Triplett, 237 N.C. 604 , 75 S.E. 2d 517 ; Tillman v. Talbert, 244 N.C. 270 , 93 S.E. 2d 101 . 1959S. v. Webster, 218 N.C. 692 , 12 S.E. 2d 272 ; S. v. Triplett, 237 N.C. 604 , 75 S.E. 2d 517 ; Tillman v. Talbert, 244 N.C. 270 , 93 S.E. 2d 101 .	1	1959–1959
Nance v. . Telegraph Co. green nc · 1919	1	1957–1957
Nance v. Western Union Telegraph Co. green · 1919	1	1957–1957
Warshaw v. Warshaw neutral nc · 1953	1	1954–1954
State v. . Brooks green nc · 1947	1	1953–1953
State v. Lambe green nc · 1950	1	1953–1953
Hoover v. Crotts green nc · 1950	1	1951–1951
Arnold v. State Bank & Trust Co. neutral nc · 1940	1	1941–1941
State v. . Moore green nc · 1931	1	1933–1933

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check