201 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rosell v. Escogreen2 sentences2015We will not reverse factual determinations, absent a finding of manifest error, Id. 1998A finding of manifest error by a reviewing court of a credibility determination must essentially determine that "documents or objective evidence so contradict the witness's story or the story itself is so internally inconsistent or implausible on its face that a reasonable fact finder would not credit the witness's story...." Rosell, 549 So.2d at 844-845 . | 4 | 27 |
Arceneaux v. Dominguegreen2 sentences1979The Louisiana standard for appellate review of fact, stated in Canter v. Koehring, 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973) and recently re-emphasized and clarified in Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La. 1978), requires a finding of manifest error in reversing a factual finding of a trial court. "`Manifestly erroneous,' in its simplest terms, means `clearly wrong.' ... [T]he appellate court should not disturb such a finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong, " Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra, at 1333. 1979The Louisiana standard for appellate review of fact, stated in Canter v. Koehring, 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973) and recently re-emphasized and clarified in Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La. 1978), requires a finding of manifest error in reversing a factual finding of a trial court. "`Manifestly erroneous,' in its simplest terms, means `clearly wrong.' ... [T]he appellate court should not disturb such a finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong, " Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra, at 1333. | 3 | 39 |
Stobart v. State Through DOTDgreen2 sentences1996Ascertaining whether termination was with or without cause is a factual determination and will only be disturbed on appeal upon a finding of manifest error. [14] Stobart v. State, Through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880 (La.1993). 1994We are unable to conclude that the contradiction between plaintiffs deposition testimony and his trial testimony warrants a finding of manifest error in the light of Stobart v. State through DOTD, 617 So.2d 880, 882 (La.1993). | 2 | 4 |
Succession of Daiglegreen2 sentences2012Succession of Daigle, 601 So.2d 10 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992). _kiv. 2011Id. | 2 | 4 |
Martin v. East Jefferson General Hosp.green2 sentences2011Id. (citing Martin v. East Jefferson General Hospital, 582 So.2d 1272, 1276 (La.1991)). 2008Id. (citing Martin v. East Jefferson General Hospital, 582 So.2d 1272, 1276 (La.1991)). | 2 | 3 |
White v. Cox Operating, LLCgreen2 sentences2020White v. Cox Operating, LLC, 2016-0901, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/5/17), 229 So.3d 534, 538 (citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 9 (La. 4/14/04), 874 So.2d 90, 98 ). 2020White v. Cox Operating, LLC, 2016-0901, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/5/17), 229 So.3d 534, 538 (citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 9 (La. 4/14/04), 874 So.2d 90, 98 ). | 2 | 2 |
| Davis v. Hibernia Nat. Bankgreen | 2 | 2 |
Canter v. Koehring Companygreen2 sentences1993Canter v. Koehring Co., 283 So.2d 716, 724 (La.1973). 1979The Louisiana standard for appellate review of fact, stated in Canter v. Koehring, 283 So.2d 716 (La.1973) and recently re-emphasized and clarified in Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La. 1978), requires a finding of manifest error in reversing a factual finding of a trial court. "`Manifestly erroneous,' in its simplest terms, means `clearly wrong.' ... [T]he appellate court should not disturb such a finding of fact unless it is clearly wrong, " Arceneaux v. Domingue, supra, at 1333. | 1 | 17 |
Jenkins v. Jenkinsgreen2 sentences1986Jenkins v. Jenkins, supra. Viewing the evidence as a whole, we find no error in the district court’s determination that Mrs. Whiteley’s conduct was not sufficient to find her at fault under C.C. art. 138. 1986Jenkins v. Jenkins, 441 So.2d 507 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 1223 (La.1984); and Aguillard v. Aguillard, 380 So.2d 104 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979), writ denied, 381 So.2d 1206 (La.1980). | 1 | 4 |
| Edwards v. Sawyer Indus. Plastics, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Gardner Realtors, LLC v. Iteldgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RRgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Shields v. City of Shreveportgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Belanger v. Gabriel Chemicals, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
green
2 sentences2020In Urquhart, this Court explained that the Louisiana Supreme Court “summarized the standard of review applicable to allocation of fault determinations.” Id. (citing Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 2000- 0066, pp. 10-11 (La. 10/30/00), 773 So.2d 670, 680-81 ). 2017Clement, supra. In Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 00-0066, pp. 10-11 (La. 10/30/00), 773 So.2d 670, 680-81 , the Supreme Court summarized the standard of review applicable to allocation of fault determinations as follows: This Court has previously addressed the allocation of fault and the standard of review to be applied by appellate courts reviewing such determinations. | 4 | 2015–2020 |
Clark v. Trus Joist MacMillian
green
2 sentences2015Further, “[t]he court should err on the side of maintaining the class action since the judge may always modify or amend the class at any time prior to a decision on the merits.” Clark, 836 So.2d at 459 -60 (citing La.Code Civ.P. art. 592 A(3)(c)). 2012Further, “[t]he court should err on the side of maintaining the class action since the judge may always modify or amend the class at any time prior to a decision on the merits.” Clark, 836 So.2d at 459 -60 (citing La. | 4 | 2008–2015 |
Roberson v. Town of Pollock
green
2 sentences2015However, “[t]he district court has wide discretion in deciding whether to certify a class and the decision will not be overturned absent a finding of manifest error or abuse of discretion.” Roberson v. Town of Pollock, 05-332, p. 9 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/9/05), 915 So.2d 426, 432 , writ denied, 06-213 (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 550 . 2012However, “[t]he district court has wide discretion in deciding whether to certify a class and the decision will not be overturned absent a finding of manifest error or abuse of discretion.” Roberson v. Town of Pollock, 05-332, p. 9 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/9/05), 915 So.2d 426, 432 , writ denied, 06-213 (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 550 . | 4 | 2008–2015 |
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. Slaughter
neutral
2 sentences2015However, “[t]he district court has wide discretion in deciding whether to certify a class and the decision will not be overturned absent a finding of manifest error or abuse of discretion.” Roberson v. Town of Pollock, 05-332, p. 9 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/9/05), 915 So.2d 426, 432 , writ denied, 06-213 (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 550 . 2012However, “[t]he district court has wide discretion in deciding whether to certify a class and the decision will not be overturned absent a finding of manifest error or abuse of discretion.” Roberson v. Town of Pollock, 05-332, p. 9 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/9/05), 915 So.2d 426, 432 , writ denied, 06-213 (La.4/24/06), 926 So.2d 550 . | 4 | 2008–2015 |
Adams v. CSX Railroads
green
2 sentences2006Defraites, supra; Adams v. CSX Railroads, 92-1077 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/26/93) , 615 So.2d 476 . 2005Defraites, supra; Adams v. CSX Railroads, 92-1077 (La.App. 4th Cir.2/26/93), 615 So.2d 476 . | 4 | 2004–2006 |
Allemand v. Allemand
green
2 sentences1989Allemand v. Allemand, 415 So.2d 463 (La. 1985Slater v. Slater, supra; Allemand v. Allemand, 415 So.2d 463 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982). | 4 | 1983–1989 |
Bordelon v. Sayer
green
2 sentences2018Bordelon v. Sayer , 01-0717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02) , 811 So.2d 1232 , 1235, (citations omitted), writ denied , 02-1009 (La. 6/21/02), 819 So.2d 340 . 2016Bordelon v. Sayer, 01-0717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02) , 811 So.2d 1232, 1235 , (citations omitted), writ denied, 02-1009 (La. 6/21/02), 819 So.2d 340 . | 3 | 2008–2018 |
Bordelon v. Sayer
green
2 sentences2018Bordelon v. Sayer , 01-0717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02) , 811 So.2d 1232 , 1235, (citations omitted), writ denied , 02-1009 (La. 6/21/02), 819 So.2d 340 . 2016Bordelon v. Sayer, 01-0717 (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/13/02) , 811 So.2d 1232, 1235 , (citations omitted), writ denied, 02-1009 (La. 6/21/02), 819 So.2d 340 . | 3 | 2008–2018 |
Sperandeo v. Sydran Food Services, II, LP
neutral
2 sentences2012Sperandeo v. Sydran Food Services, II, L.P., 01-675 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/12/01) , 806 So.2d 724, 727 . 2010Sperandeo v. Sydran Food Services, II, L.P., 01-675 (La.App. 5 Cir. 12/12/01) , 806 So.2d 724, 727 . | 3 | 2009–2012 |
Brannon v. Boe
green
2 sentences2010Brannon v. Boe, supra. As such, the trial court’s findings are entitled to great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed, absent a finding of manifest error or clear wrongness. 2010Brannon, supra; Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Co., 542 So.2d 831 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989). | 3 | 1995–2010 |
Shields v. City of Shreveport
green
2 sentences2010Shields v. City of Shreveport, 565 So.2d 473, 480 (La.App. 2 Cir.1990), aff'd, 579 So.2d 961 (La.1991). 2008Id. | 3 | 2005–2010 |
Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
neutral
2 sentences2010Brannon, supra; Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Co., 542 So.2d 831 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989). 1997Brannon v. Boe, 569 So.2d 1086 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1990); Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 542 So.2d 831 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989). | ^Carpenter v. Lafayette Woodworks, Inc., 94-1011, p. 12 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/1/95), 653 So.2d 1187, 1194 . | 3 | 1995–2010 |
Peterson Contractors, Inc. v. Herd Producing Co., Inc.
neutral
2 sentences2009Peterson Contractors, Inc. v. Herd Producing Company, Inc., 35,567 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/27/02), 811 So.2d 130 . 2002Peterson Contractors, Inc. v. Herd Producing Company, Inc., 35,567 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/02), 811 So.2d 130 . | 3 | 2002–2009 |
Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford
green
2 sentences2006Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford, 02-588 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/02) , 834 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 03-364 (La.4/21/03), 841 So.2d 802 . 2003Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford, 02-588 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/02) , 834 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 03-364 (La.4/21/03), 841 So.2d 802 . | 3 | 2003–2006 |
Palmer v. Schooner Petroleum Services
green
2 sentences2006Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford, 02-588 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/02) , 834 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 03-364 (La.4/21/03), 841 So.2d 802 . 2003Colonial Nursing Home v. Bradford, 02-588 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/30/02) , 834 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 03-364 (La.4/21/03), 841 So.2d 802 . | 3 | 2003–2006 |
Grace v. Board of Trustees
green
2 sentences1986Jenkins v. Jenkins, 441 So.2d 507 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1983), writ denied, 444 So.2d 1223 (La.1984); and Aguillard v. Aguillard, 380 So.2d 104 (La.App. 1st Cir.1979), writ denied, 381 So.2d 1206 (La.1980). 1986Pearce v. Pearce, supra ; Jenkins v. Jenkins, 441 So.2d 507 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied 444 So.2d 1223 (La.1984). | 3 | 1986–1986 |
Montgomery v. Breaux
green
2 sentences1982Montgomery v. Breaux, 338 So.2d 314 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1976), writ denied 341 So.2d 410 (La.1977). 1980The acknowledgment must be express; it must be certain; it must be definite; it must be accompanied by or coupled with the clear purpose and intention of the party to interrupt prescription by such an acknowledgment.” And in Montgomery v. Breaux, 338 So.2d 314 , (La.App. 3 Cir. 1976), with respect to a verbal acknowledgment of non-ownership this court said: “[SJuffice it to say that factual conclusions of the trial court, particularly where the credibility of witnesses is involved, should not be disturbed on appellate review except upon a finding of manifest error.” We cannot say the trial jud | 3 | 1977–1982 |
Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.
green
2 sentences2020White v. Cox Operating, LLC, 2016-0901, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/5/17), 229 So.3d 534, 538 (citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 9 (La. 4/14/04), 874 So.2d 90, 98 ). 2020White v. Cox Operating, LLC, 2016-0901, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/5/17), 229 So.3d 534, 538 (citing Hall v. Folger Coffee Co., 2003-1734, p. 9 (La. 4/14/04), 874 So.2d 90, 98 ). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Braud v. Cenac
green
2 sentences2019Braud v. Cenac , 03-1696, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/14/04), 879 So.2d 896 , 902-03, writ denied , 04-2101 (La. 11/15/04), 887 So.2d 484 (citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks omitted). 2019Braud v. Cenac , 03-1696, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/14/04), 879 So.2d 896 , 902-03, writ denied , 04-2101 (La. 11/15/04), 887 So.2d 484 (citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Robinson v. Ferrari
green
2 sentences2019Braud v. Cenac , 03-1696, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/14/04), 879 So.2d 896 , 902-03, writ denied , 04-2101 (La. 11/15/04), 887 So.2d 484 (citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks omitted). 2019Braud v. Cenac , 03-1696, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/14/04), 879 So.2d 896 , 902-03, writ denied , 04-2101 (La. 11/15/04), 887 So.2d 484 (citations, footnotes, and internal quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Fontana v. Fontana
green
2 sentences2019Id.; Fontana v. Fontana, 426 So. 2d 351 (La. 2017Fontana v. Fontana, 426 So.2d 351 (La. | 2 | 2017–2019 |
State ex rel. E.M.
neutral
2 sentences2019Id. 2019Id. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
| O'ROURKE v. Cairns green | 2 | 2018–2018 |
| Economy Auto Salvage, Inc. v. Allstate Ins. Co. green | 2 | 1990–2017 |
| Lemoine v. Insurance Co. of North America green | 2 | 1990–2017 |
| Ficarra v. Ficarra neutral | 2 | 2015–2016 |
| Serigne v. Ivker green | 2 | 2008–2011 |
| Turnbull v. Thensted green | 2 | 2007–2009 |
| Succession of Armstrong green | 2 | 1998–2006 |
| Smith v. JE Merit Constructors, Inc. neutral | 2 | 2003–2006 |
| Stelly v. Health South Rehabilitation neutral | 2 | 2004–2005 |
| Johnson v. State neutral | 2 | 2003–2004 |
| Lyons v. Bechtel Corp. neutral | 2 | 2003–2004 |
| Kelley v. Jack Jackson Const. Co. neutral | 2 | 2001–2002 |
| Dailey v. Royal Insurance Co. green | 2 | 1990–1993 |
| Harrington v. Campbell green | 2 | 1983–1988 |
| Pearce v. Pearce green | 2 | 1986–1988 |
| Aguillard v. Aguillard neutral | 2 | 1983–1986 |
| Slater v. Slater green | 2 | 1984–1985 |
| Douglas v. Douglas green | 2 | 1982–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.