32 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 17 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hobsongreen2 sentences2021That is, “would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure or search ‘warrant a [person] of reasonable caution in the belief’ that the action taken was appropriate.” State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920, 925 , 523 P.2d 523, 528 (1974) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). 2021That is, “would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure or search ‘warrant a [person] of reasonable caution in the belief’ that the action taken was appropriate.” State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920, 925 , 523 P.2d 523, 528 (1974) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). | 3 | 3 |
Terry v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2021That is, “would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure or search ‘warrant a [person] of reasonable caution in the belief’ that the action taken was appropriate.” State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920, 925 , 523 P.2d 523, 528 (1974) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). 2021That is, “would the facts available to the officer at the moment of the seizure or search ‘warrant a [person] of reasonable caution in the belief’ that the action taken was appropriate.” State v. Hobson, 95 Idaho 920, 925 , 523 P.2d 523, 528 (1974) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 22 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). | 1 | 3 |
Brinegar v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2025Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 (1949); Williams, 162 Idaho at 66 , 394 P.3d at 109 . 10 When reviewing an officer’s actions, the court must judge the facts against an objective standard. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Julian
green
2 sentences2021Julian, 129 Idaho at 136 , 922 P.2d at 1062 . 2021Julian, 129 Idaho at 136 , 922 P.2d at 1062 . | 17 | 2007–2021 |
State v. Chad Lee Williams
green
2 sentences2025Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 (1949); Williams, 162 Idaho at 66 , 394 P.3d at 109 . 10 When reviewing an officer’s actions, the court must judge the facts against an objective standard. 2025Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160, 175 (1949); Williams, 162 Idaho at 66 , 394 P.3d at 109 . 10 When reviewing an officer’s actions, the court must judge the facts against an objective standard. | 10 | 2024–2026 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2021In discussing the probable cause inquiry, we noted: 2 Nor does it appear that any person in Idaho, aside from Clark, has appealed a conviction under the felony enhancement of unlawful entry since it was added to Idaho Code section 18-7034 in 2017. 3 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 8 When reviewing an officer’s actions the court must judge the facts against an objective standard. 2021In discussing the probable cause inquiry, we noted: 2 Nor does it appear that any person in Idaho, aside from Clark, has appealed a conviction under the felony enhancement of unlawful entry since it was added to Idaho Code section 18-7034 in 2017. 3 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 8 When reviewing an officer’s actions the court must judge the facts against an objective standard. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.