30 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Deibert v. Bauer Bros. Const. Co., Inc.green2 sentences2001“To determine whether a duty exists in a certain instance, a court considers the following factors: (1) the reasonable foreseeability of injury, (2) the likelihood of injury, (3) the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, and (4) the consequences of placing that burden upon the defendant.” Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinois, 191 Ill. 2d 278, 303 (2000), citing Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co., 141 Ill. 2d 430, 437-38 (1990). 2001“To determine whether a duty exists in a certain instance, a court considers the following factors: (1) the reasonable foreseeability of injury, (2) the likelihood of injury, (3) the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, and (4) the consequences of placing that burden upon the defendant.” Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinois , 191 Ill. 2d 278, 303 (2000), citing Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co. , 141 Ill. 2d 430, 437-38 (1990). | 4 | 4 |
People v. Quintanagreen2 sentences2019People v. Quintana, 332 Ill. 2019People v. Quintana, 332 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Neil v. Biggersgreen2 sentences2015Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 (1972); People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 (1989). 2014Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 (1972); People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 (1989). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Slimgreen2 sentences2015Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 (1972); People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 (1989). 2014Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 (1972); People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 (1989). | 2 | 2 |
Pancoe v. Singhgreen2 sentences2008Pancoe v. Singh, 376 Ill. 2008Pancoe v. Singh, 376 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinoisgreen2 sentences2001“To determine whether a duty exists in a certain instance, a court considers the following factors: (1) the reasonable foreseeability of injury, (2) the likelihood of injury, (3) the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, and (4) the consequences of placing that burden upon the defendant.” Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinois, 191 Ill. 2d 278, 303 (2000), citing Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co., 141 Ill. 2d 430, 437-38 (1990). 2001“To determine whether a duty exists in a certain instance, a court considers the following factors: (1) the reasonable foreseeability of injury, (2) the likelihood of injury, (3) the magnitude of the burden of guarding against the injury, and (4) the consequences of placing that burden upon the defendant.” Jones v. Chicago HMO Ltd. of Illinois , 191 Ill. 2d 278, 303 (2000), citing Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co. , 141 Ill. 2d 430, 437-38 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
Ward v. K Mart Corp.green2 sentences2001“Lastly, the existence of a duty turns in large part on public policy considerations.” Jones, 191 Ill. 2d at 303-04 , citing Ward v. K mart Corp., 136 Ill. 2d 132, 151 (1990). 2001“Lastly, the existence of a duty turns in large part on public policy considerations.” Jones , 191 Ill. 2d at 303-04 , citing Ward v. Kmart Corp. , 136 Ill. 2d 132, 151 (1990). | 2 | 2 |
Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Centergreen2 sentences2000Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co., 141 Ill. 2d 430, 437-38 (1990); Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 117 Ill. 2d 507, 526 (1987). 2000Deibert v. Bauer Brothers Construction Co., 141 Ill.2d 430, 437-38 , 152 Ill.Dec. 552 , 566 N.E.2d 239 (1990); Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical Center, 117 Ill.2d 507, 526 , 111 Ill.Dec. 944 , 513 N.E.2d 387 (1987). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Cunninghamgreen1 sentence2025Robinson, 167 Ill. 2d at 408 . ¶ 30 On appeal, this court must determine if, “in light of the record, a fact finder could reasonably accept the testimony as true beyond a reasonable doubt.” People v. Cunningham, 212 Ill. 2d 274, 279 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Selingergreen1 sentence2020In re Marriage of Selinger, 351 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Eckertgreen1 sentence2020In re Marriage of Eckert, 119 Ill. 2d 316, 325 (1988); 750 ILCS 5/609.2(g) (West 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Peal v. Leegreen1 sentence2020App. 3d 815, 823 (1990). ¶ 11 To determine whether a trial court erred in imposing sanctions for a discovery violation, this court considers the following factors: “(1) the surprise to the adverse party; (2) the prejudicial effect of the proffered testimony or evidence; (3) the nature of the testimony or evidence; (4) the diligence of the adverse party in seeking discovery; (5) the timeliness of the adverse party’s objection to the testimony or evidence; and (6) the good faith of the party offering the testimony or evidence.” Peal v. Lee, 403 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences2000The court considers the following factors in evaluating the admissibility of a statement when defendant was initially arrested in violation of the fourth amendment: (1) whether the defendant received any Miranda warnings; (2) the time period between the arrest and the statement; (3) the existence of any intervening circumstances; and (4) “particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.” Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 45 L. 2000The court considers the following factors in evaluating the admissibility of a statement when defendant was initially arrested in violation of the fourth amendment: (1) whether the defendant received any Miranda warnings; (2) the time period between the arrest and the statement; (3) the existence of any intervening circumstances; and (4) “particularly, the purpose and flagrancy of the official misconduct.” Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 603-04 , 45 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2025Robinson, 167 Ill. 2d at 408 . ¶ 30 On appeal, this court must determine if, “in light of the record, a fact finder could reasonably accept the testimony as true beyond a reasonable doubt.” People v. Cunningham, 212 Ill. 2d 274, 279 (2004). 2022Robinson, 167 Ill. 2d at 408 . ¶ 19 Defendant asserts that the State did not establish that he possessed the cocaine recovered from the parking lot. | 2 | 2022–2025 |
Graver v. Pinecrest Volunteer Fire Department
green
2 sentences2016Our supreme court has observed: “Although the United States Supreme Court has not clarified what is meant by ‘arising out of’ or ‘related to’ in the context of a jurisdiction question [citation], several courts have determined that the applicable standard is lenient or flexible.”4 Russell, 2013 IL 113909, ¶ 83 . 3 “A nonresident defendant’s contract with an Illinois resident alone does not automatically establish the required minimum contacts. [Citation.] Instead, in determining whether a defendant has purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Illinois law in forming the contract, the co 2016Our supreme court has observed: “Although the United States Supreme Court has not 3 “A nonresident defendant’s contract with an Illinois resident alone does not automatically establish the required minimum contacts. [Citation.] Instead, in determining whether a defendant has purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Illinois law in forming the contract, the court considers the following factors: (1) who initiated the transaction; (2) where the contract was formed; and (3) where the contract was performed. [Citation.]” Graver v. Pinecrest Volunteer Fire Department, 2014 IL App (1st) 12300 | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Bolger v. Nautica International, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Sollami v. Eaton
green
2 sentences2004Sollami , 201 Ill. 2d at 17 . 2004Sollami, 201 Ill. 2d at 17 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
In Re MF
green
1 sentence2024He quotes In re M.F., 326 Ill. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In Re RL
green
1 sentence2022The court considers the following factors to determine the child’s best interest: “the child’s physical safety and welfare; the development of the child’s identity; the child’s familial, cultural, and religious background; the child’s sense of attachment, including love, security, familiarity, *** continuity of relationships with parent figures and other relatives; the uniqueness of every family and child; the risks related to substitute care; and the preferences of the person available to care for the child. [Citations.]” Id. ¶ 40 We find the trial court’s judgments finding A.M. unfit, termin | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Bailey
green
1 sentence2022Bailey, 333 Ill. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In re Custody of G.L.
green
1 sentence2022In re Custody of G.L., 2017 IL App (1st) 163171, ¶ 42 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In re Parentage of P.D.
green
1 sentence2021In re P.D., 2017 IL App (2d) 170355, ¶ 30 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Cardenas Marketing Network v. Pabon
green
1 sentence2021Cardenas Marketing Network, Inc. v. Pabon, 2012 IL App (1st) 111645, ¶ 36 . ¶ 43 In their second amended complaint, the twins argued that by creating the accounts and naming herself as custodian, Caroline made a promise substantially connected to Illinois to act as a fiduciary of Illinois residents. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Russell v. SNFA
green
1 sentence2016Our supreme court has observed: “Although the United States Supreme Court has not clarified what is meant by ‘arising out of’ or ‘related to’ in the context of a jurisdiction question [citation], several courts have determined that the applicable standard is lenient or flexible.”4 Russell, 2013 IL 113909, ¶ 83 . 3 “A nonresident defendant’s contract with an Illinois resident alone does not automatically establish the required minimum contacts. [Citation.] Instead, in determining whether a defendant has purposefully availed himself of the benefits of Illinois law in forming the contract, the co | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Kliner
green
2 sentences2000In reviewing the sentences of codefendants, this court considers the following factors: "the nature of the offense, each defendant's relative involvement or culpability, his character and background, including any criminal record, and his potential for rehabilitation." Kliner, 185 Ill.2d at 175-76 , 235 Ill.Dec. 667 , 705 N.E.2d 850 . 2000In reviewing the sentences of codefendants, this court considers the following factors: "the nature of the offense, each defendant's relative involvement or culpability, his character and background, including any criminal record, and his potential for rehabilitation." Kliner, 185 Ill.2d at 175-76 , 235 Ill.Dec. 667 , 705 N.E.2d 850 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Metropulos v. Chicago Art Glass, Inc.
green
2 sentences1990(Metropulos v. Chicago Art Glass, Inc. (1987), 156 Ill. 1990The court considers the following factors in making its determination *313 of whether a confidential relationship exists: the degree of kinship of the parties; the disparity in age; health and mental condition; education and business experience between the parties; and the degree of trust placed in the dominant party. ( Metropulos v. Chicago Art Glass, Inc. (1987), 156 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.