27 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pierce v. City of Lansinggreen2 sentences2021See Pierce v Lansing, 265 Mich App 174, 182-183 ; 694 NW2d 65 (2005); MCR 7.203(A)(1) (“An appeal from an order described in MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii)-(v) is limited to the portion of the order with respect to which there is an appeal or right.”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a final order, which is appealable as of right, to include “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party, including a governmental agency, official, or employee under MCR 2.116(C)(7) or an order denying a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) based on governmental immunity.”). 2021See Pierce v Lansing, 265 Mich App 174, 182-183 ; 694 NW2d 65 (2005); MCR 7.203(A)(1) (“An appeal from an order described in MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii)-(v) is limited to the portion of the order with respect to which there is an appeal or right.”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a final order, which is appealable as of right, to include “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party, including a governmental agency, official, or employee under MCR 2.116(C)(7) or an order denying a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) based on governmental immunity.”). | 2 | 3 |
Seldon v. Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportationgreen2 sentences2026In Seldon, this Court recognized that, “regardless of the specific basis of the trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary disposition, whenever the effect is to deny a defendant’s claim of immunity, the trial court’s decision is, in fact, ‘an order denying governmental immunity,’ and is reviewable under MCR 7.203(A) and MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v).” Seldon, 297 Mich App at 436 , quoting Walsh v Taylor, 263 Mich App 618, 625 ; 689 NW2d 506 (2004). 2017A trial court’s decision is “an order denying governmental immunity” “whenever the effect is to deny a defendant’s claim of immunity.” Seldon v Suburban Mobility Auth for Regional Transp, 297 Mich App 427, 436 ; 824 NW2d 318 (2012) (quotations and citations omitted). | 1 | 6 |
Michelle Renee Fairley v. Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2020Because the Legislature expressly waived governmental immunity in the PWDCRA, see In re Bradley Estate, 494 Mich at 393 n 60, the PWDCRA does not require compliance with MCL 600.6431 for a plaintiff to proceed with his or her claim against a state defendant, and “MCL 600.6431 does not confer governmental immunity,” Fairley, 497 Mich at 297 (quotation marks omitted), plaintiff’s failure to comply with MCL 600.6431 when bringing her PWDCRA claim does not implicate governmental immunity.4 Therefore, the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) was n 2020The Court of Appeals granted defendant’s application and consolidated the two appeals. 4 600.6431(1) was a condition precedent to avoiding governmental immunity, see Fairley v Dep’t of Corrections, 497 Mich 290, 297 ; 871 NW2d 129 (2015), the denial of defendant’s motion amounted to “ ‘an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental . . . official,’ ” making it a “final order under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v).” Progress Mich, 324 Mich App at 665-666 (citation omitted). | 1 | 3 |
Progress Michigan v. Attorney Generalgreen2 sentences2021Progress Mich v Attorney General, 324 Mich App 659, 666 ; 922 NW2d 654 (2018), rev’d ___ Mich ___; ___ NW2d ___ (2020) (Docket No. 158151). 2020The Court of Appeals granted defendant’s application and consolidated the two appeals. 4 600.6431(1) was a condition precedent to avoiding governmental immunity, see Fairley v Dep’t of Corrections, 497 Mich 290, 297 ; 871 NW2d 129 (2015), the denial of defendant’s motion amounted to “ ‘an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental . . . official,’ ” making it a “final order under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v).” Progress Mich, 324 Mich App at 665-666 (citation omitted). | 1 | 2 |
Blair v. Checker Cab Co.green2 sentences2023See Blair v Checker Cab Co, 219 Mich App 667, 670-671 ; 558 NW2d 439 (1996) (trial court properly considered motion for summary disposition under appropriate subrule despite motion being framed under another subrule). [Krieger I, unpub order at 2 (emphasis added).] Because this order involved a jurisdictional question about whether defendants had an appeal by right from a decision of the Court of Claims,12 the order did not actually decide the merits of whether the Court of Claims properly reviewed defendants’ motion for summary disposition under 12 Generally, this Court has jurisdiction of an 2023See Blair v Checker Cab Co, 219 Mich App 667, 670-671 ; 558 NW2d 439 (1996) (trial court properly considered motion for summary disposition under appropriate subrule despite motion being framed under another subrule). [Krieger I, unpub order at 2 (emphasis added).] Because this order involved a jurisdictional question about whether defendants had an appeal by right from a decision of the Court of Claims,12 the order did not actually decide the merits of whether the Court of Claims properly reviewed defendants’ motion for summary disposition under 12 Generally, this Court has jurisdiction of an | 1 | 1 |
| People v. Beasleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Jones v. City of Ypsilantigreen | 1 | 1 |
| Johnson v. City of Pontiacgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Putkamer v. Transamerica Insurance Corp. of Americagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kustasz v. City of Detroitgreen | 1 | 1 |
Hussey v. City of Muskegon Heightsgreen2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 1 |
| Haliw v. City of Sterling Heightsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Rule v. City of Bay Citygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Estate of Buckner v. City of Lansinggreen | 1 | 1 |
| Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road Commissiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, Incgreen | 1 | 1 |
Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road Commissiongreen2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 1 |
| MacLachlan v. Capital Area Transportation Authoritygreen | 1 | 1 |
Hanson v. Mecosta County Road Commissionersgreen2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 1 |
Barribeau v. City of Detroitgreen2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walsh v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2026In Seldon, this Court recognized that, “regardless of the specific basis of the trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary disposition, whenever the effect is to deny a defendant’s claim of immunity, the trial court’s decision is, in fact, ‘an order denying governmental immunity,’ and is reviewable under MCR 7.203(A) and MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v).” Seldon, 297 Mich App at 436 , quoting Walsh v Taylor, 263 Mich App 618, 625 ; 689 NW2d 506 (2004). 2026In Seldon, this Court recognized that, “regardless of the specific basis of the trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary disposition, whenever the effect is to deny a defendant’s claim of immunity, the trial court’s decision is, in fact, ‘an order denying governmental immunity,’ and is reviewable under MCR 7.203(A) and MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v).” Seldon, 297 Mich App at 436 , quoting Walsh v Taylor, 263 Mich App 618, 625 ; 689 NW2d 506 (2004). | 7 | 2005–2026 |
Pierce v. City of Lansing
green
2 sentences2021See Pierce v Lansing, 265 Mich App 174, 182-183 ; 694 NW2d 65 (2005); MCR 7.203(A)(1) (“An appeal from an order described in MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii)-(v) is limited to the portion of the order with respect to which there is an appeal or right.”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a final order, which is appealable as of right, to include “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party, including a governmental agency, official, or employee under MCR 2.116(C)(7) or an order denying a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) based on governmental immunity.”). 2021See Pierce v Lansing, 265 Mich App 174, 182-183 ; 694 NW2d 65 (2005); MCR 7.203(A)(1) (“An appeal from an order described in MCR 7.202(6)(a)(iii)-(v) is limited to the portion of the order with respect to which there is an appeal or right.”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a final order, which is appealable as of right, to include “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party, including a governmental agency, official, or employee under MCR 2.116(C)(7) or an order denying a motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) based on governmental immunity.”). | 3 | 2021–2023 |
Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of Regents
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 2 | 2009–2019 |
Reed v. Breton
green
2 sentences2015Reed v Breton, 279 Mich App 239, 242 ; 756 NW2d 89 (2008). 2015Reed v Breton, 279 Mich App 239, 242 ; 756 NW2d 89 (2008). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Farley v. Carp
green
1 sentence2024“However, if a question of fact exists to the extent that factual development could provide a basis for recovery, dismissal is inappropriate.” Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Federated Insurance v. Oakland County Road Commission
green
2 sentences2024Under MCR 7.202(6), a “ ‘final judgment’ or ‘final order’ means: (a) In a civil case, (i) the first judgment or order that disposes of all the claims and adjudicates the rights and liabilities of all the parties, including such an order entered after reversal of an earlier final judgment or order; (ii) an order designated as final under MCR 2.604(B); (iii) in a domestic relations action, a postjudgment order that, as to a minor, grants or denies a motion to change legal custody, physical custody, or domicile; (iv) a postjudgment order awarding or denying attorney fees and costs under court rul 2024Under MCR 7.202(6), a “ ‘final judgment’ or ‘final order’ means: (a) In a civil case, (i) the first judgment or order that disposes of all the claims and adjudicates the rights and liabilities of all the parties, including such an order entered after reversal of an earlier final judgment or order; (ii) an order designated as final under MCR 2.604(B); (iii) in a domestic relations action, a postjudgment order that, as to a minor, grants or denies a motion to change legal custody, physical custody, or domicile; (iv) a postjudgment order awarding or denying attorney fees and costs under court rul | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Lamkin v. Engram
green
2 sentences2020The Court gives the language of court rules their ‘plain and ordinary meaning.’ ” Lamkin v Engram, 295 Mich App 701, 709 ; 815 NW2d 793 (2012) (citation omitted). 2020The Court gives the language of court rules their ‘plain and ordinary meaning.’ ” Lamkin v Engram, 295 Mich App 701, 709 ; 815 NW2d 793 (2012) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
in Re Bradley Estate
green
1 sentence2020Because the Legislature expressly waived governmental immunity in the PWDCRA, see In re Bradley Estate, 494 Mich at 393 n 60, the PWDCRA does not require compliance with MCL 600.6431 for a plaintiff to proceed with his or her claim against a state defendant, and “MCL 600.6431 does not confer governmental immunity,” Fairley, 497 Mich at 297 (quotation marks omitted), plaintiff’s failure to comply with MCL 600.6431 when bringing her PWDCRA claim does not implicate governmental immunity.4 Therefore, the trial court’s denial of defendants’ motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7) was n | 1 | 2020–2020 |
McLean v. City of Dearborn
green
2 sentences2019We agree.2 1 According to plaintiff’s counsel, the recordings of the 911 calls were destroyed after a couple of months and therefore were no longer available. 2 Plaintiff raises a jurisdictional challenge to defendant’s appeal, arguing that because the trial court stated at the May 30, 2018 hearing that it was not ruling on defendant’s motion at that time, its subsequent order was not a “final order” under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a “final order” as including “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party . . . .”) That -2- “The governmental tort liability act [GTLA], MCL 2019We agree.2 1 According to plaintiff’s counsel, the recordings of the 911 calls were destroyed after a couple of months and therefore were no longer available. 2 Plaintiff raises a jurisdictional challenge to defendant’s appeal, arguing that because the trial court stated at the May 30, 2018 hearing that it was not ruling on defendant’s motion at that time, its subsequent order was not a “final order” under MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (defining a “final order” as including “an order denying governmental immunity to a governmental party . . . .”) That -2- “The governmental tort liability act [GTLA], MCL | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Alpert v. City of Ann Arbor green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Ross v. Consumers Power Co. red | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Moross Against Hillsdale County
neutral
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Scheurman v. Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Tillman v. Great Lakes Truck Center, Inc
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Meredith v. City of Melvindale
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Baker v. Waste Management of Michigan, Inc
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Stord v. Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Kendricks v. Rehfield
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
People v. Jones
green
1 sentence2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Henry v. Dow Chemical Co. green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Lash v. City of Traverse City
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Smith v. City of Warren
neutral
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Burise v. City of Pontiac green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Robinson v. City of Lansing green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Wilson v. Alpena County Road Commission green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Grimes v. Department of Transportation green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Herman v. City of Detroit
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Maiden v. Rozwood green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Smith v. Kowalski
green
2 sentences2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go 2009We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Because Jerome Plunkett is bringing this claim on behalf of Holly Plunkett’s estate, any reference to “Plunkett” will refer to Jerome Plunkett unless otherwise indicated. 2 See MCL 691.1404. 3 MCL 691.1402(1); MCL 691.1407(1). 4 See MCR 7.203(A)(1) (stating that this Court “has jurisdiction of an appeal of right filed by an aggrieved party from... [a] final judgment or final order of the circuit court, or court of claims”); MCR 7.202(6)(a)(v) (stating that in a civil case, a “final judgment” or “final order” means “an order denying governmental immunity to a go | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Brown v. City of Owosso green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Ridgeway v. City of Escanaba green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, Inc green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Newton v. Michigan State Police green | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.