five factor test (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

five factor test in Washington

26 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Sublettgreen
wash · 2012 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Sublett, 176 Wn.2d at 73 (lead opinion), 94 (Madsen, C.J., concurring), 136 (Stephens, J., concurring); see also id. at 73-74 (citing Press-Enter.

2014Sublett, 176 Wn.2d at 73 (lead opinion), 94 (Madsen, C.J., concurring), 136 (Stephens, J., concurring); see also id. at 73-74 (citing Press-Enter.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Bone-Club green
wash · 1995
2 sentences

2016Trial courts assess these competing interests by using the five factor analysis articulated in State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995).

2015In general, this right requires that certain proceedings be held in open court unless application of the five- factor test set forth in State v. Bone -Club, 128 Wn.2d 254 , 258 -59, 906 P. 2d 325 ( 1995), supports closure of the courtroom.

152013–2016
State v. Bone-Club green
wash · 1995
2 sentences

2016Trial courts assess these competing interests by using the five factor analysis articulated in State v. Bone-Club, 128 Wn.2d 254, 258-59 , 906 P.2d 325 (1995).

2015In general, this right requires that certain proceedings be held in open court unless application of the five- factor test set forth in State v. Bone -Club, 128 Wn.2d 254 , 258 -59, 906 P. 2d 325 ( 1995), supports closure of the courtroom.

142013–2016
Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa green
wash · 1982
2 sentences

2008To the extent documents in court files are intended to inform a judicial decision, they are presumed open. [5] But such records may be sealed when "other significant and fundamental rights" override the public interest in open records. [6] ¶ 8 In Rufer v. Abbott Laboratories [7] and Dreiling v. Jain, [8] the Supreme Court clarified the procedures and standards for sealing court records, and reiterated the five factor test from Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa, 97 Wash.2d 30 , 640 P.2d 716 (1982): a showing of the need for closure, notice to interested parties, use of the least restrictive means a

2008To the extent documents in court files are intended to inform a judicial decision, they are presumed open. [5] But such records may be sealed when "other significant and fundamental rights" override the public interest in open records. [6] ¶ 8 In Rufer v. Abbott Laboratories [7] and Dreiling v. Jain, [8] the Supreme Court clarified the procedures and standards for sealing court records, and reiterated the five factor test from Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa, 97 Wash.2d 30 , 640 P.2d 716 (1982): a showing of the need for closure, notice to interested parties, use of the least restrictive means a

42008–2013
State v. Lord green
wash · 1992
2 sentences

2017State v. Lord, 117 Wn.2d 829, 873 , 822 P.2d 177 (1991).

2017State v. Lord, 117 Wn.2d 829, 873 , 822 P.2d 177 (1991).

22017–2017
State v. Wise green
wash · 2012
2 sentences

2016Wise, 176 Wn.2d at 10 .

2016Wise, 176 Wn.2d at 10 .

22013–2016
State v. Williams green
· 1981
2 sentences

2016State v. Williams, 96 Wn.2d 215, 222-223 , 634 P.2d 868 (1981).

2016State v. Williams, 96 Wn.2d 215, 222-223 , 634 P.2d 868 (1981).

22013–2016
McRae v. Bolstad green
wash · 1984
2 sentences

2007Id. ¶ 48 In clarifying the public interest element, Hangman Ridge announced two new elements of a CPA claim.

2007Id. ¶48 In clarifying the public interest element, Hangman Ridge announced two new elements of a CPA claim.

22007–2007
State v. Love green
washctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2015Love, 176 Wn.

12015–2015

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (7)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 26 (2007–2017) LA 16 (1984–2018) MN 9 (1984–2016) PA 5 (1985–2025) IN 4 (1996–2012) WV 4 (1981–2017) TN 4 (1999–2018) WY 3 (1988–1999) ID 3 (1994–2001) SC 3 (2010–2024) HI 3 (2019–2026) IL 3 (1998–2020) WI 2 (1980–1986) MD 2 (1977–2018) OK 2 (1988–2006) AR 2 (2025–2026) ND 2 (2007–2007) FL 2 (1998–1998) IA 2 (1994–2016) CT 2 (2003–2009) TX 2 (2006–2010)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check