25 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bourquegreen2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348,1351 (La.1978). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348, 1351 (La.1978). | 6 | 7 |
State v. McIntyregreen2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348,1351 (La.1978). 1996A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights." State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643, 644 (La.1993) (citing [ State v. ] McIntyre [ 365 So.2d 1348 (La.1978)]) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). | 4 | 6 |
State v. Rossgreen2 sentences1996A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights." State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643, 644 (La.1993) (citing [ State v. ] McIntyre [ 365 So.2d 1348 (La.1978)]) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). 1996A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives the defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights." State v. Ross, 623 So.2d 643, 644 (La.1993). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Robertsongreen2 sentences2020The denial of a challenge of cause on the grounds of bias is not reversible error or an abuse of discretion if the record shows that the juror was rehabilitated through further inquiry or instruction and subsequently demonstrated “a willingness and ability to decide the case according to the law and the evidence.” Id. (emphasis added) The general rule is that a district court’s “erroneous ruling” depriving a defendant of a peremptory challenge is a substantial violation of the defendant’s rights and, accordingly, “[p]rejudice is presumed when a challenge for cause is erroneously denied and all 1994In contrast to State v. Robertson, supra , and State v. Ross, supra , the trial court's erroneous ruling cannot be said to have deprived the defendant of a peremptory challenge which thereby substantially violated his rights. | 3 | 5 |
State v. Browngreen2 sentences1996See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84, 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La. 1986). 1994See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84 , *1281 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La.1986). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Leegreen2 sentences1996See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84, 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La. 1986). 1994See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84 , *1281 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La.1986). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Lindseygreen2 sentences2015State v. Lindsey, 06-255, p. 2 (La.1/17/07), 948 So.2d 105, 107 ; State v. Michel, 07-47, p. 8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/29/07), 961 So.2d 516, 522 , writ denied, 07-1422 (La.1/7/08), 973 So.2d 732 . 2011Blank, 955 So.2d at 114 ; Lindsey, 948 So.2d at 107 . | 1 | 3 |
State v. Comeauxgreen2 sentences1996See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84, 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La. 1986). 1994See also State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993); State v. Lee, 559 So.2d 1310, 1317 (La.1990); State v. Comeaux, 514 So.2d 84 , *1281 93 (La.1987); and State v. Brown, 496 So.2d 261, 263-66 (La.1986). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence2016In State v. Mitchell, 08-136, pp. 14-15 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/13/09) , 7 So.3d 720, 730 (footnotes omitted), the fifth circuit stated the standard of review: Article I, § 17 of the Louisiana Constitution guarantees that “[t]he accused shall have a right to full voir dire examination of prospective jurors and to challenge jurors peremptorily.” A district court’s erroneous ruling depriving a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant’s rights and constitutes reversible error. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fallongreen1 sentence2007A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights."); cf. State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 10 (La.7/1/97), 700 So.2d 810, 818 (failure to remove juror with a remaining peremptory challenge waives appellate review of trial court's denial of a cause challenge to the jury); State v. Mitchell, 94-2078, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 250, 254 (the Court need not reach the question of whether there was an erroneous denial of a cause challenge when the defendant struck the juror and had peremptory challenges remaining at t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence2007A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights."); cf. State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 10 (La.7/1/97), 700 So.2d 810, 818 (failure to remove juror with a remaining peremptory challenge waives appellate review of trial court's denial of a cause challenge to the jury); State v. Mitchell, 94-2078, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 250, 254 (the Court need not reach the question of whether there was an erroneous denial of a cause challenge when the defendant struck the juror and had peremptory challenges remaining at t | 1 | 1 |
State v. Connollygreen1 sentence2007A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights."); cf. State v. Connolly, 96-1680, p. 10 (La.7/1/97), 700 So.2d 810, 818 (failure to remove juror with a remaining peremptory challenge waives appellate review of trial court's denial of a cause challenge to the jury); State v. Mitchell, 94-2078, p. 4 (La.5/21/96), 674 So.2d 250, 254 (the Court need not reach the question of whether there was an erroneous denial of a cause challenge when the defendant struck the juror and had peremptory challenges remaining at t | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cross
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348,1351 (La.1978). 1996A trial court's erroneous ruling which deprives a defendant of a peremptory challenge substantially violates that defendant's rights."... [Emphasis in original; citations omitted.] See also State v. Cross, 93-1189 (La. 6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 . | 4 | 1996–2013 |
State v. Kang
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348,1351 (La.1978). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348, 1351 (La.1978). | 4 | 2007–2013 |
State v. Juniors
green
2 sentences2019Juniors , 03-2425 at 7-8, 915 So.2d at 304 ; see La. 2019Juniors , 03-2425 at 7-8, 915 So.2d at 304 ; see La. | 3 | 2017–2019 |
State v. Comeaux
green
2 sentences2013Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348,1351 (La.1978). 2012Kang , 02-2812, at p. 3, 859 So.2d at 652 ; State v. Cross, 93-1189, p. 6 (La.6/30/95), 658 So.2d 683, 686 ; State v. Bourque, 622 So.2d 198, 225 (La.1993), overruled on other grounds by State v. Comeaux, 93-2729 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 16 ; State v. McIntyre, 365 So.2d 1348, 1351 (La.1978). | 3 | 2007–2013 |
State of Louisiana v. Eric Dale Mickelson
green
1 sentence2020The denial of a challenge of cause on the grounds of bias is not reversible error or an abuse of discretion if the record shows that the juror was rehabilitated through further inquiry or instruction and subsequently demonstrated “a willingness and ability to decide the case according to the law and the evidence.” Id. (emphasis added) The general rule is that a district court’s “erroneous ruling” depriving a defendant of a peremptory challenge is a substantial violation of the defendant’s rights and, accordingly, “[p]rejudice is presumed when a challenge for cause is erroneously denied and all | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Mickel
green
1 sentence2015State v. Lindsey, 06-255, p. 2 (La.1/17/07), 948 So.2d 105, 107 ; State v. Michel, 07-47, p. 8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/29/07), 961 So.2d 516, 522 , writ denied, 07-1422 (La.1/7/08), 973 So.2d 732 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Mickel
green
1 sentence2015State v. Lindsey, 06-255, p. 2 (La.1/17/07), 948 So.2d 105, 107 ; State v. Michel, 07-47, p. 8 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/29/07), 961 So.2d 516, 522 , writ denied, 07-1422 (La.1/7/08), 973 So.2d 732 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Doucet
neutral
1 sentence2011State v. Mazique, 09-845, p. 15 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/27/10), 40 So.3d 224, 235-36 , writ denied, 10-1198 (La.12/17/10), 51 So.3d 19 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Mazique
green
1 sentence2011State v. Mazique, 09-845, p. 15 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/27/10), 40 So.3d 224, 235-36 , writ denied, 10-1198 (La.12/17/10), 51 So.3d 19 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Blank
green
1 sentence2011Blank, 955 So.2d at 114 ; Lindsey, 948 So.2d at 107 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Maxie
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.