153 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2026 68 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cummingsgreen2 sentences2026The mere raising of a claim for PCR does not entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing because they "must do more than make bald assertions that [they were] denied the effective assistance of counsel." State v. Porter, 216 N.J. 343, 355 (2013) (quoting State v. Cummings, 321 N.J. 2025The mere raising of a claim for PCR does not entitle defendant to an evidentiary hearing and defendant "must do more than make bald assertions that he [or she] was denied the effective assistance of counsel." State v. Porter, 216 N.J. 343, 355 (2013) (quoting State v. Cummings, 321 N.J. | 124 | 148 |
State v. Oscar Porter (069223)green2 sentences2026The mere raising of a claim for PCR does not entitle a defendant to an evidentiary hearing because they "must do more than make bald assertions that [they were] denied the effective assistance of counsel." State v. Porter, 216 N.J. 343, 355 (2013) (quoting State v. Cummings, 321 N.J. 2025A-3597-22 11 The mere raising of a claim for PCR does not entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing as defendants "must allege specific facts and evidence supporting [their] allegations." State v. Porter, 216 N.J. 343, 355 (2013). "[B]ald assertions" will not suffice. | 6 | 6 |
State of New Jersey v. Edward Peoplesgreen2 sentences2026"The mere raising of a claim of [ineffective assistance of counsel] does not entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing." State v. Peoples, 446 N.J. 2026"The mere raising of a claim of [ineffective assistance of counsel] does not entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing." State v. Peoples, 446 N.J. | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.