en banc hearing in Louisiana

23 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
Lamson Petroleum v. Hallwood Petroleumgreen la · 2002 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2010 2 sentences 2010See, e.g., Lamson Petroleum v. Hallwood Petroleum, 02-1338 (La.10/25/02), 832 So.2d 975 . 2005See, e.g., Lamson Petroleum v. Hallwood Petroleum, 02-1338 (La.10/25/02), 832 So.2d 975 .	3	3
United States v. Jack Hutchins Haesegreen ca5 · 1999 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–2000 2 sentences 2000This court relied on its previous holding in State v. Jenkins, 508 So.2d 191 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 512 So.2d 438 (La.1987), and on United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359 (5th Cir.1998), and the fact that Singleton was vacated by the circuit originally rendering the decision and an en banc hearing was ordered. 1999Furthermore, this court noted that recently the U.S. Fifth Circuit in United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359 (5th Cir.1998), refused to follow Singleton’s reasoning and holding.	2	4
State v. Robinsongreen lactapp · 1995 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999 2 sentences 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 . 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 .	1	1
Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc., and Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co., Intervenor-Appellantgreen ca5 · 1985 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991 1 sentence 1991See Barrett v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 752 F.2d 129 (5 Cir.1985) [reversed on other grounds in an en banc hearing, 781 F.2d 1067 (5 Cir.1986)].	1	1
Jethro Barrett v. Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., E.B.B. Co., Inc. And Lift Barge, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Company, Intervenor-Appellantgreen ca5 · 1986 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991 1 sentence 1991See Barrett v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 752 F.2d 129 (5 Cir.1985) [reversed on other grounds in an en banc hearing, 781 F.2d 1067 (5 Cir.1986)].	1	1
Bauer v. Whitegreen lactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989INTERPRETATION OF THE UM STATUTE This en banc hearing was granted to reconsider our holding in Bauer v. White, 532 So.2d 506, 508 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988), that "[t]he purposes of the uninsured motorist statute are all furthered by liberally construing the statute to include exemplary damages as well as compensatory damages in those `damages ... because of bodily injury' that insurers are required to pay their insureds. " [Emphasis added.] The majority has specifically reaffirmed this holding.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

Case	Cited	Years
Williams v. JACKSON PARISH HOSP. neutral lactapp · 2000 2 sentences 2010Finding that Walker I appeared to conflict with Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, 33,847 (La.App. 2 Cir. 10/20/00), 768 So.2d 866 , rev’d on other grounds, 00-3170 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 921 , the Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case for an en banc hearing. 2005Finding that this court's opinion appeared to conflict with our prior decision in Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, 33,847 (La.App. 2d Cir.10/20/00), 768 So.2d 866 , rev'd on other grounds, 00-3170 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 921 , the supreme court vacated this court's judgment and remanded the case for an en banc hearing.	2	2005–2010
Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital green la · 2001 2 sentences 2010Finding that Walker I appeared to conflict with Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, 33,847 (La.App. 2 Cir. 10/20/00), 768 So.2d 866 , rev’d on other grounds, 00-3170 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 921 , the Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case for an en banc hearing. 2005Finding that this court's opinion appeared to conflict with our prior decision in Williams v. Jackson Parish Hospital, 33,847 (La.App. 2d Cir.10/20/00), 768 So.2d 866 , rev'd on other grounds, 00-3170 (La.10/16/01), 798 So.2d 921 , the supreme court vacated this court's judgment and remanded the case for an en banc hearing.	2	2005–2010
Walker v. Bossier Medical Center green la · 2005 2 sentences 2010Walker v. Bossier Medical Center, 04-1797 (La.2/25/05), 894 So.2d 1096 . 10 On remand, the court en banc found the statute constitutional. 2005Walker v. Bossier Medical Center, 04-1797 (La.2/25/05), 894 So.2d 1096 .	2	2005–2010
Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. neutral lactapp · 2002 2 sentences 2002The Third Circuit is ordered to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether their decisions in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 814 So.2d 134 and Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., 2002-138 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02, 823 So.2d 976 431) are in conflict with their decision in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/20/02, 814 So.2d 596 ), on the issue of whether or not defendants are good faith possessors after the filing of judicial demand, an 2002This Court was ordered 426 to hold an en banc hearing to determine whether our "decisions in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 814 So.2d 134 and Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., 2002-138 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02) , 823 So.2d 431 are in conflict with [our] decision in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/20/02), 814 So.2d 596 , on the issue of whether or not defendants are good faith possessors after the filing of judicial demand, and if	2	2002–2002
Fontenot v. Petmecky green la · 1980 2 sentences 1998The case was remanded from the Supreme Court for an en banc hearing to determine if the case was in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980), which determined that no authority existed for the award of mental anguish damages under La. 1998We were instructed “to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether this decision [Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer, 96-1344 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/21/97) ; 698 So.2d 408 ] is in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980) and if so to determine which view is correct.” 97-2552 (La.1/9/98); 704 So.2d. 246.	2	1998–1998
Fontenot v. Petmecky green lactapp · 1980 2 sentences 1998The case was remanded from the Supreme Court for an en banc hearing to determine if the case was in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980), which determined that no authority existed for the award of mental anguish damages under La. 1998We were instructed “to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether this decision [Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer, 96-1344 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/21/97) ; 698 So.2d 408 ] is in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980) and if so to determine which view is correct.” 97-2552 (La.1/9/98); 704 So.2d. 246.	2	1998–1998
Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. green lactapp · 1989 2 sentences 1991This case was remanded to us with orders to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether the decision is in conflict with Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 554 So.2d 1270 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 1360 (La.1990), and if so, determine which view is correct. 1990The Third Circuit is ordered to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether this decision is in conflict with Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 554 So.2d 1270 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1989), and if so to determine which view is correct.	2	1990–1991
State v. Ramsey green la · 2012 1 sentence 2013Given the breadth of the supreme court’s pronouncement in its jurisprudence, we find no error in the trial court’s rejection of the plaintiffs’ constitutional claims in all regards nor in its determination that “La.R.S. 40:1299.42(B) is fully constitutional.” Rather, the trial court accurately remarked in its ruling on remand that, in Oliver, 85 So.3d 89 , the supreme court “maintained the constitutionality of the statute without qualification.” Accordingly, we find that the plaintiffs’ claims lack merit. \| aMotion for En Banc Hearing Finally, the plaintiffs filed a motion with this court seek	1	2013–2013
Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic neutral la · 2011 2 sentences 2012Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 10-2766, 10-2782, 10-2785 (La.3/25/11), 57 So.3d 307, 308 . 2012Oliver v. Magnolia Clinic, 10-2766, 10-2782, 10-2785 (La.3/25/11), 57 So.3d 307, 308 .	1	2012–2012
State v. Brady green la · 1975 1 sentence 2010This fact was made clear by the court’s holding in State v. Brady, 310 So.2d 593 (La.1975), which addressed an en banc rule adopted by the judges of the Criminal District Court on December 9, 1974, authorizing the magistrate judge to try misdemeanor cases allotted for that purpose to the Magistrate Section of court.	1	2010–2010
Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. green lactapp · 2002 2 sentences 2002This Court was ordered 426 to hold an en banc hearing to determine whether our "decisions in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 814 So.2d 134 and Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., 2002-138 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02) , 823 So.2d 431 are in conflict with [our] decision in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/20/02), 814 So.2d 596 , on the issue of whether or not defendants are good faith possessors after the filing of judicial demand, and if 2002This Court was ordered 426 to hold an en banc hearing to determine whether our "decisions in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/02), 814 So.2d 134 and Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc., et al., 2002-138 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02) , 823 So.2d 431 are in conflict with [our] decision in Lamson Petroleum Corporation v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc ., et al., XXXX-XXXX (La.App. 3 Cir. 3/20/02), 814 So.2d 596 , on the issue of whether or not defendants are good faith possessors after the filing of judicial demand, and if	1	2002–2002
State v. Jenkins green lactapp · 1987 1 sentence 2000This court relied on its previous holding in State v. Jenkins, 508 So.2d 191 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 512 So.2d 438 (La.1987), and on United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359 (5th Cir.1998), and the fact that Singleton was vacated by the circuit originally rendering the decision and an en banc hearing was ordered.	1	2000–2000
State v. Harden green la · 1987 1 sentence 2000This court relied on its previous holding in State v. Jenkins, 508 So.2d 191 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 512 So.2d 438 (La.1987), and on United States v. Haese, 162 F.3d 359 (5th Cir.1998), and the fact that Singleton was vacated by the circuit originally rendering the decision and an en banc hearing was ordered.	1	2000–2000
State v. Polkey green lactapp · 1996 2 sentences 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 . 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 .	1	1999–1999
State v. Nicholas neutral lactapp · 1997 2 sentences 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 . 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 .	1	1999–1999
State v. Robinson green lactapp · 1998 2 sentences 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 . 1999See: State v. Robinson, 653 So.2d at 670, 671 ; State v. Polkey, 669 So.2d at 3 ; State v. Nicholas, 695 So.2d at 1035 ; State v. Robinson, 707 So.2d at 82 .	1	1999–1999
Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer neutral lactapp · 1997 1 sentence 1998We were instructed “to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether this decision [Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer, 96-1344 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/21/97) ; 698 So.2d 408 ] is in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980) and if so to determine which view is correct.” 97-2552 (La.1/9/98); 704 So.2d. 246.	1	1998–1998
Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer neutral lactapp · 1998 1 sentence 1998We were instructed “to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether this decision [Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. Deshazer, 96-1344 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/21/97) ; 698 So.2d 408 ] is in conflict with Fontenot v. Petmecky, 386 So.2d 702 (La.App. 3 Cir.), writ denied, 393 So.2d 747 (La.1980) and if so to determine which view is correct.” 97-2552 (La.1/9/98); 704 So.2d. 246.	1	1998–1998
Morgan v. Earnest Corp. green lactapp · 1997 1 sentence 1997After an en banc hearing in Morgan v. The Earnest Corporation, 97-0869 (La.App. 1st Cir. 11/7/97), 704 So.2d 272 , a majority of the judges held that Act 483 was prospective in its application.	1	1997–1997
Estes v. THE KROGER COMPANY green la · 1990 1 sentence 1991This case was remanded to us with orders to hold an en banc hearing and determine whether the decision is in conflict with Duhon v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., 554 So.2d 1270 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), writ denied, 559 So.2d 1360 (La.1990), and if so, determine which view is correct.	1	1991–1991
Dauzat v. Gregory & Cook, Inc. neutral la · 1984 1 sentence 1984Separate opinions will be issued in each suit. .Writs have been granted by the Supreme Court in Roy, 445 So.2d 430 (Feb. 10, 1984), and in Decedue, 446 So.2d 1216 (Mar. 16, 1984).	1	1984–1984
Broel v. City of New Orleans neutral la · 1984 1 sentence 1984Separate opinions will be issued in each suit. .Writs have been granted by the Supreme Court in Roy, 445 So.2d 430 (Feb. 10, 1984), and in Decedue, 446 So.2d 1216 (Mar. 16, 1984).	1	1984–1984
Butler v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co. neutral la · 1978 1 sentence 1980Butler v. MFA Mutual Insurance Company, 356 So.2d. 1129 (La.App., 2nd Cir., 1978), writ denied 358 So.2d 641 (La., 1978).	1	1980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:30.1 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 3 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 9:5628 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:118 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 37 (1981–2025) LA 23 (1980–2013) VA 16 (1987–2010) WA 7 (1936–2012) PA 5 (1975–2021) NJ 2 (1989–1991) DC 2 (1976–1977) TX 2 (2015–2025) DE 2 (1967–2001) SC 2 (1931–1985) IA 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check