21 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Willisgreen2 sentences2025"Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal." State v. Willis, 312 Kan. 127 , 131, 475 P.3d 324 (2020). 2022See also State v. Willis, 312 Kan. 127 , 131, 475 P.3d 324 (2020) ("Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal."). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Reynoldsgreen2 sentences1984State v. Reynolds, 230 Kan. 532 , 639 P.2d 461 (1982). 1984State v. Reynolds, 230 Kan. 532 , 639 P.2d 461 (1982). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Gulleygreen2 sentences2022Cf. State v. Gulley, 315 Kan. 86, 91 , 505 P.3d 354 (2022) ("'Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal.'"). 2022Cf. State v. Gulley, 315 Kan. 86, 91 , 505 P.3d 354 (2022) ("'Under the invited error doctrine, a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that same error on appeal.'"). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2015See State v. Jones, 295 Kan. 804, 811-13 , 286 P.3d 562 (2012). 2015See State v. Jones, 295 Kan. 804, 811-13 , 286 P.3d 562 (2012). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Divinegreen2 sentences2014See State v. Divine, 291 Kan. 738, 742 , 246 P.3d 692 (2011). 2014See State v. Divine, 291 Kan. 738, 742 , 246 P.3d 692 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Crawfordgreen2 sentences1993See State v. Crawford, 250 Kan. 174, 177 , 824 P.2d 951 (1992); State v. Cramer, 17 Kan. 1993See State v. Crawford, 250 Kan. 174, 177 , 824 P.2d 951 (1992); State v. Cramer, 17 Kan. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Verser
green
2 sentences2025State v. Verser, 299 Kan. 776, 784 , 326 P.3d 1046 (2014). 2025State v. Verser, 299 Kan. 776, 784 , 326 P.3d 1046 (2014). | 7 | 2015–2025 |
State v. Higgins
green
2 sentences1993Under these circumstances, the doctrine of invited error seems appropriate: “It is a general rule that a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that error on appeal.” State v. Higgins, 243 Kan. 48, 51 , 755 P.2d 12 (1988). 1993Under these circumstances, the doctrine of invited error seems appropriate: “It is a general rule that a litigant may not invite error and then complain of that error on appeal.” State v. Higgins, 243 Kan. 48, 51 , 755 P.2d 12 (1988). | 3 | 1992–1993 |
State v. Cramer
green
1 sentence1993See State v. Crawford, 250 Kan. 174, 177 , 824 P.2d 951 (1992); State v. Cramer, 17 Kan. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Gray
green
2 sentences1988State v. Gray, 235 Kan. 632 , 681 P.2d 669 (1984). 1988State v. Gray, 235 Kan. 632 , 681 P.2d 669 (1984). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
State v. Phippen
neutral
2 sentences1982State v. Phippen, 208 Kan. 962 , 494 P.2d 1137 (1972), is particularly persuasive. 1982State v. Phippen, 208 Kan. 962 , 494 P.2d 1137 (1972), is particularly persuasive. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.