type of dispositional hearing (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

type of dispositional hearing in Ohio

21 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2024 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
In re C.R. green
ohio · 2006
2 sentences

2021In re C.R., 108 Ohio St.3d 369 , 2006–Ohio–1191, 843 N.E.2d 1188 ; In re P.S., 5th Dist.

2019In re C.R., 108 Ohio St.3d 369 , 2006–Ohio–1191, 843 N.E.2d 1188 ; In re P.S., 5th Dist.

192012–2021
In the Matter of Nice green
ohioctapp · 2001
2 sentences

2021No. CA2006– 12–105, 2007–Ohio–3350 at ¶ 14; In re Nice, 141 Ohio App.3d 445, 455 , 751 N.E.2d 552 (7th Dist.2001). {¶41} In this type of dispositional hearing, the focus is on the best interest of the child.

2021No. CA2006– 12–105, 2007–Ohio–3350 at ¶ 14; In re Nice, 141 Ohio App.3d 445, 455 , 751 N.E.2d 552 (7th Dist.2001). {¶41} In this type of dispositional hearing, the focus is on the best interest of the child.

82012–2021
In Re A.C., Ca2006-12-105 (7-2-2007) green
ohioctapp · 2007
2 sentences

2013No. CA2006-12-105, 2007-Ohio-3350 at ¶ 14 ; In re Nice, 141 Ohio App.3d 445, 455 , 751 N.E.2d 552 (7th Dist. 2001). {¶30} In this type of dispositional hearing, the focus is on the best interest of the child.

2012No. CA2006-12-105, 2007-Ohio-3350 at ¶ 14 ; In re Nice, 141 Ohio App.3d 445, 455 , 751 N.E.2d 552 (7th Dist. 2001). {¶28} In this type of dispositional hearing, the focus must be the best interest of Muskingum County, Case No. CT11-0048 10 the child.

22012–2013
In re P.S. green
ohioctapp · 2012
1 sentence

2024In re C.R., 2006-Ohio-1191 ; In re P.S., 2012-Ohio-3431 (5th Dist.). {¶ 25} We review the trial court's decision for an abuse of discretion.

12024–2024

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.414 (16) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.353 (14) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.415 (6) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.04 (5) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.03 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 3109.04 (4) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 2151.419 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 21 (2012–2024) NC 2 (2025–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check