determinations presumption (Tennessee) · Go Syfert
← Tennessee issues

determinations presumption in Tennessee

135 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Ashbygreen
tenn · 1991 · cited in 130 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 1999–2012
2 sentences

2012Id. at (d); Ashby, 823 S.W.2d at 169 .

2001Moreover, if the record reveals that the trial court adequately considered sentencing principles and all relevant facts and circumstances, this court will accord the trial court’s determinations a presumption of correctness. -15- Id. at (d); Ashby, 823 S.W.2d at 169 .

12130
State v. Clabogreen
tenncrimapp · 1995 · cited in 2 Tennessee opinions naming this issue, 2000–2002
2 sentences

2002Id.; State v. Clabo, 905 S.W.2d 197, 205 (Tenn. Crim.

2000Id.; State v. Clabo, 905 S.W.2d 197, 206 (Tenn. Crim.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Peck v. Tanner green
tenn · 2005
1 sentence

2022The trial court is “ordinarily in the best position to determine the relevant facts and adjudicate the dispute,” Puckett, 556 U.S. at 134 , while an appellate court reviews the trial court’s determinations for error based on a developed factual record, see Peck, 181 S.W.3d at 265–66; cf. Tenn. R.

12022–2022
Puckett v. United States green
scotus · 2009
1 sentence

2022The trial court is “ordinarily in the best position to determine the relevant facts and adjudicate the dispute,” Puckett, 556 U.S. at 134 , while an appellate court reviews the trial court’s determinations for error based on a developed factual record, see Peck, 181 S.W.3d at 265–66; cf. Tenn. R.

12022–2022
Forrest Construction Co. v. Laughlin green
tennctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2018Forrest Constr., 337 S.W.3d at 220 (citing Guiliano, 995 S.W.2d at 95 ).

12018–2018
Guiliano v. Cleo, Inc. green
tenn · 1999
1 sentence

2018Forrest Constr., 337 S.W.3d at 220 (citing Guiliano, 995 S.W.2d at 95 ).

12018–2018
State of Tennessee v. Susan Renee Bise green
tenn · 2012
1 sentence

2017Bise, 380 S.W.3d at 705 .

12017–2017

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-401 (132) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-102 (113) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-114 (74) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-210 (55) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-113 (54) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-103 (49) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-112 (45) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-303 (43) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-115 (38) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-102 (11) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-106 (10) TN § Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-501 (10)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TN 135 (1999–2022) NY 10 (1978–2023) NM 3 (2004–2019) IA 3 (1981–2014) ND 2 (2004–2004) SD 2 (2000–2002) MO 2 (1989–1994) RI 2 (2001–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check