oft-stated exception (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

oft-stated exception in Pennsylvania

21 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1965–2023 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (18)

CaseFollowedCited
Shadduck v. Christopher J. Kaclik, Inc.green
pasuperct · 1998 · cited in 8 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1999–2023
2 sentences

2023Kaclik, Inc., 713 A.2d 635 , 636 (Pa. Super. 1998) (citations omitted). -7- J-E01003-23 Here, the dispute involves the third prong ─ whether the question presented is such that if review is postponed until final judgment, the claimed right will be irreparably lost.10 See Beltran, 748 A.2d at 718 .

2021“There exists, however, a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.” Id. (citations omitted).

78
Midomo Co. v. Presbyterian Housing Development Co.green
pasuperct · 1999 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2003–2015
2 sentences

2015Co., 739 A.2d 180, 184 (Pa.Super.1999) (“While an order denying preliminary objections is generally not appealable, there exists a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.”).

2003Accordingly, we shall determine whether the trial court erred in interpreting section 2207 to conclude that Tippins’s arbitration provision was, indeed, “knocked out” and that the contract the parties formed did not compel arbitration. ¶ 8 In this case, the trial court denied Tippins’s preliminary objections. ‘While an order denying preliminary objections is generally not appealable, *1283 ‘[t]here exists ... a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.’ ” Midomo Co., Inc. v. Presbyterian Housing Devel

22
Beltran v. Piersodygreen
pasuperct · 2000 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023See also Beltran v. Piersody, 748 A.2d 715 , 718 (Pa. Super. 2000) (relying on Wells). ____________________________________________ 9 “There exists, however, a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.” Shadduck v. Christopher J.

2023See also Beltran v. Piersody, 748 A.2d 715, 718 (Pa. Super. 2000) (relying on Wells). ____________________________________________ 9 “There exists, however, a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.” Shadduck v. Christopher J.

11
Washburn v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc.green
pasuperct · 2015 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016On (Footnote Continued Next Page) -7- J-A26007-16 Initially, we note that “[o]ur scope and standard of review of a claim that the trial court erred in overruling a preliminary objection in the nature of a motion to compel arbitration is whether there has been an abuse of discretion and whether the trial court's findings are supported by substantial evidence.” Washburn v. Northern Health Facilities, Inc., 121 A.3d 1008, 1012 (Pa. Super. 2015) (citation omitted).

11
Hallo v. Floregreen
pa · 1989 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
2 sentences

1998See, e.g., Hazleton Area School Dist. v. Bosak, 671 A.2d 277, 281, n. 8 (Pa.Commw.1996); Hallo v. Flore, 386 Pa.Super. 178 , 562 A.2d 856, 857 (1989).

1998See, e.g., Hazleton Area School Dist. v. Bosak, 671 A.2d 277, 281, n. 8 (Pa.Commw.1996); Hallo v. Flore, 386 Pa.Super. 178 , 562 A.2d 856, 857 (1989).

11
Hazleton Area School District v. Bosakgreen
pacommwct · 1996 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998
1 sentence

1998See, e.g., Hazleton Area School Dist. v. Bosak, 671 A.2d 277, 281, n. 8 (Pa.Commw.1996); Hallo v. Flore, 386 Pa.Super. 178 , 562 A.2d 856, 857 (1989).

11
Commonwealth v. Brittongreen
pa · 1985 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
11
Commonwealth v. Mathisgreen
pa · 1983 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Dudengreen
pa · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Mathisgreen
pa · 1983 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Staplesgreen
pa · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Bosschegreen
pa · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Rileygreen
pa · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Campbellgreen
pa · 1986 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Reardongreen
pasuperct · 1981 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Zaenglegreen
pa · 1984 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Commonwealth v. Gillespiegreen
pa · 1986 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11
Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of Americagreen
pa · 1962 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (19)

CaseCitedYears
Elwyn v. DeLuca green
pasuperct · 2012
2 sentences

2016There exists, however, a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.” Elwyn v. DeLuca, 48 A.3d 457 , 460 n.4 (Pa. Super. 2012) (citations omitted). 6 At the outset, UPMC’s brief contained an additional issue, regarding whether the trial court erred “by not staying the case either pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 7304(d) pending the outcome of a pending arbitration, or pursuant to the court’s discretion pending a separate appeal to this Court raising some of the issues present in this case[.]” UPMC’s Brief at

2015There exists, however, a narrow exception to this oft-stated rule for cases in which the appeal is taken from an order denying a petition to compel arbitration.” Elwyn v. DeLuca, 48 A.3d 457 , 460 n.4 (Pa. Super. 2012) (citations and quotation marks omitted).

32013–2016
Trop v. Dulles green
scotus · 1958
2 sentences

1990Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101 , 78 S.Ct. 590, 598 , 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958).

1990Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101 , 78 S.Ct. 590, 598 , 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958).

11990–1990
Commonwealth v. Stambaugh green
pa · 1986
2 sentences

1988Commonwealth v. Stambaugh, 355 Pa.Super. 73 , 512 A.2d 1216 (1986).

1988Commonwealth v. Stambaugh, 355 Pa.Super. 73 , 512 A.2d 1216 (1986).

11988–1988
Commonwealth v. Wilks green
pasuperct · 1977
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Ohlinger green
pa · 1985
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Norris green
pa · 1982
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Zaengle green
pa · 1985
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Fulton green
pa · 1983
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Britton green
pa · 1986
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Lane green
pasuperct · 1975
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Albertson green
pasuperct · 1979
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Adame green
pa · 1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law merger

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Lee green
pa · 1987
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law merger

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Isabell green
pa · 1983
2 sentences

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

1987See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gillespie, 512 Pa. 349, 355 , 516 A.2d 1180, 1183 (1986) (plurality opinion) (double jeopardy claim); Commonwealth v. Isabell, 503 Pa. 2 , 9 & n. 6, 467 A.2d 1287 , 1290-91 & n. 6 (1983) (dictum) (questioning rule); Commonwealth v. Norris, 498 Pa. 308 , 319 n. 9, 446 A.2d 246 , 251 n. 9 (1982) (duplicitous sentences claim); Commonwealth v. Lee, 363 Pa.Super. 405 , 526 A.2d 405 (1987) *276 (failure to impose mandatory minimum sentence on recidivist drunk driver); Commonwealth v. Campbell, 351 Pa. Super. 56, 59-63 , 505 A.2d 262, 263-651 (1986) (en banc) (common law me

11987–1987
Commonwealth v. Lovette green
pa · 1982
11984–1984
Swartwood v. Commonwealth green
pacommwct · 1981
11983–1983
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board green
pacommwct · 1982
11983–1983
Cinciripini v. Harmony Short Line Motor Transportation Co. neutral
pa · 1965
11965–1965
Weed v. Kerr green
pa · 1965
11965–1965

Statutes the citing opinions construe

PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7320 (5) PA § 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 7304 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 40 (1958–2024) AL 31 (1954–2025) PA 21 (1965–2023) CA 17 (1930–2021) IL 14 (1948–2015) KS 13 (1943–2013) MO 9 (1917–2022) NJ 9 (1980–2021) IN 8 (1979–2019) WI 7 (1976–2023) FL 7 (1957–2019) TX 5 (1976–2000) OH 5 (1980–2006) NC 5 (1964–2018) MD 4 (1974–2002) NE 4 (1956–1991) LA 3 (1958–1979) HI 3 (1978–1995) WA 3 (1972–2011) KY 3 (1988–2022) CT 3 (1980–2019) MA 3 (1986–2019) WY 3 (1984–2013) OR 2 (1977–1992) OK 2 (1977–1999) AK 2 (1981–1985) MN 2 (1979–1984) SC 2 (1984–2005) UT 2 (1984–1992) ME 2 (2010–2010) AZ 2 (1979–2004) MT 2 (1995–1997) GA 2 (1938–1981) VT 2 (2009–2009) RI 2 (1984–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check