20 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Szilagyi v. Testagreen2 sentences2020See NRCP 17(a)(1) (providing that every action "must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interese); Szilagyi v. Testa, 99 Nev. 834, 838 , 673 P.2d 495, 498 (1983) (explaining that "[a] 'real party in interest under NRCP 17(a) is one who possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation" (internal footnote omitted)). 2020See NRCP 17(a)(1) (providing that every action "must be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interese); Szilagyi v. Testa, 99 Nev. 834, 838 , 673 P.2d 495, 498 (1983) (explaining that "[a] 'real party in interest under NRCP 17(a) is one who possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation" (internal footnote omitted)). | 8 | 9 |
Arguello v. Sunset Station, Inc.green2 sentences2022A party has standing if it "possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 2022A party has standing if it "possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). | 5 | 6 |
Painter v. Andersongreen2 sentences2016Painter v. Anderson, 96 Nev. 941, 943, 620 P.2d 1254, 1255-56 (1980) ("The concept 'real party in interest' under NRCP 17(a) means that an action shall be brought by a party who possesses the right to enforce the claim and who has a significant interest in the litigation." (internal quotations omitted)). 2016Painter v. Anderson, 96 Nev. 941, 943, 620 P.2d 1254, 1255-56 (1980) ("The concept 'real party in interest' under NRCP 17(a) means that an action shall be brought by a party who possesses the right to enforce the claim and who has a significant interest in the litigation." (internal quotations omitted)). | 2 | 3 |
Beazer Homes Holding Corp. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clarkgreen2 sentences2018Court, 128 Nev. 723, 730-31 , 291 P.3d 128, 133 (2012) ("[A]n action must be commenced by the real party in interest— one who possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation. 2018Court, 128 Nev. 723, 730-31 , 291 P.3d 128, 133 (2012) ("[A]n action must be commenced by the real party in interest— one who possesses the right to enforce the claim and has a significant interest in the litigation. | 1 | 1 |
Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLCgreen2 sentences2016See Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 124 Nev. 951, 958 , 194 P.3d 96, 100 (2008). 2016See Baldonado v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 124 Nev. 951, 958 , 194 P.3d 96, 100 (2008). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Virginia Elec. & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.
green
1 sentence1980Corp., 485 F.2d 78 , 83 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 (1974). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.
green
1 sentence1980Corp., 485 F.2d 78 , 83 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 (1974). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.