Cranman restatement rule in Alabama

19 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ex Parte Buttsgreen ala · 2000 · cited in 14 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2001–2025 2 sentences 2025See Ex parte Butts, 775 So. 2d 173 (Ala. 2000) (adopting, by majority, the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity). 2010See Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000) (adopting, by majority, the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity).	12	14
Ex Parte Davisgreen ala · 2005 · cited in 3 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2008–2025 2 sentences 2025However, this Court has consistently held that a claim for monetary damages made against a constitutional officer in the officer's individual capacity is barred by State immunity whenever the acts that are the basis of the alleged liability were performed within the course and scope of the officer's employment." Ex parte Davis, 930 So. 2d 497, 500-01 (Ala. 2005) (emphasis added). 2010However, this Court has consistently held that a claim for monetary damages made against a constitutional officer in the officer’s individual capacity is barred by State immunity whenever the acts that are the basis of the alleged liability were performed within the course and scope of the officer’s employment.’ ” Hale, 6 So.3d at 457 (quoting Davis, 930 So.2d at 500-01 (emphasis in Hale omitted; other emphasis added)).	3	3
Ex Parte Colemangreen ala · 2003 · cited in 2 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [5] The testimony of Childress is from the criminal proceeding. [6] Keith's testimony is from the criminal proceeding. [7] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and must resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the nonmoving party"). [8] Justice See's special writing states that "[g]iven 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala. 2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. 5 The testimony of Childress is from the criminal proceeding. 6 Keith's testimony is from the criminal proceeding. 7 See Ex parte Coleman, [Ms. 1010644, March 14, 2003] 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and must resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the nonmoving party"). 8 Justice See's special writi	2	2
Ex Parte Cranmangreen ala · 2000 · cited in 5 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2002–2009 2 sentences 2003The Wrights’ action[ ] against Peacock ... arise[s] from decisions [he] made in educating students ..., [a category] specifically included within the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. 792 So.2d at 405 .” Spivey, 846 So.2d at 331-32 . 2003The Wrights' action against Peacock . . . arise[s] from decisions [he] made in educating students . . ., [a category] specifically included within the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. 792 So.2d at 405 ." Spivey , 846 So.2d at 331 -32 .	1	5
Ex Parte Spiveygreen ala · 2002 · cited in 3 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2016 2 sentences 2016See Ex parte Spivey, 846 So.2d 322, 331-32 (Ala.2002) (noting that “[a] State agent is also immune from civil liability for exercising judgment in supervising personnel” and that a supe rior’s supervision of personnel is a category “specifically included within the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity”); and Gowens v. Tys. 2003The Wrights’ action[ ] against Peacock ... arise[s] from decisions [he] made in educating students ..., [a category] specifically included within the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. 792 So.2d at 405 .” Spivey, 846 So.2d at 331-32 .	1	3
Gowens v. Tys. S. Ex Rel. Davisgreen ala · 2006 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016S., 948 So.2d 513, 532 (Ala.2006) (“ ‘[B]ecause supervisory ... functions require constant decision-making, they are, for the most part, discretionary.’ ” (quoting Love v. Davis, 14 F.Supp.2d 1273, 1278 (M.D.Ala.1998))).	1	1
Love v. Davisgreen alnd · 1998 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016S., 948 So.2d 513, 532 (Ala.2006) (“ ‘[B]ecause supervisory ... functions require constant decision-making, they are, for the most part, discretionary.’ ” (quoting Love v. Davis, 14 F.Supp.2d 1273, 1278 (M.D.Ala.1998))).	1	1
Siegert v. Gilleygreen scotus · 1991 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [2] "Sprawling" is a wrestling technique in which a player throws his legs back, typically landing on his knees, in order to avoid having his legs grabbed by his opponent. [3] Furlow testified that Auburn High School is a member of the AHSAA. [4] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary-judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [2] "Sprawling" is a wrestling technique in which a player throws his legs back, typically landing on his knees, in order to avoid having his legs grabbed by his opponent. [3] Furlow testified that Auburn High School is a member of the AHSAA. [4] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary-judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and	1	1
BE&K INC. v. Bakergreen · 2003 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala. 2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. 5 The testimony of Childress is from the criminal proceeding. 6 Keith's testimony is from the criminal proceeding. 7 See Ex parte Coleman, [Ms. 1010644, March 14, 2003] 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and must resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the nonmoving party"). 8 Justice See's special writi	1	1
Borders v. City of Huntsvillegreen ala · 2003 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [5] The testimony of Childress is from the criminal proceeding. [6] Keith's testimony is from the criminal proceeding. [7] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and must resolve all reasonable doubts in favor of the nonmoving party"). [8] Justice See's special writing states that "[g]iven	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Jenkins v. Hale green ala · 2008 1 sentence 2010However, this Court has consistently held that a claim for monetary damages made against a constitutional officer in the officer’s individual capacity is barred by State immunity whenever the acts that are the basis of the alleged liability were performed within the course and scope of the officer’s employment.’ ” Hale, 6 So.3d at 457 (quoting Davis, 930 So.2d at 500-01 (emphasis in Hale omitted; other emphasis added)).	1	2010–2010
Ex Parte Haralson green ala · 2003 1 sentence 2009This Court explained in Ex parte Haralson, 853 So.2d 928 , 931 n. 1 (Ala.2003), that "[t]he immunity available to the State in an action against the State is now referred to as 'State immunity.’ ” The immunity available to defendants sued in their individual capacity for actions taken on behalf of the State is now referred to as “State-agent immunity.’1 See Cranman, 792 So.2d at 397 (distinguishing between State immunity and State-agent immunity). .	1	2009–2009
Ex Parte Wood green ala · 2002 1 sentence 2008Ex parte Wood , 852 So.2d 705 (Ala. 2002).	1	2008–2008
Ex Parte Franklin County Dept. of Human Resources green ala · 1996 2 sentences 2003Butts , 775 So.2d at 176 ; Ex parte Franklin County Dep't of Human Res. , 674 So.2d 1277 (Ala. 1996). 2003P. Butts, 775 So.2d at 176 ; Ex parte Franklin County Dep't of Human Res., 674 So.2d 1277 (Ala.1996).	1	2003–2003
Mitchell v. Forsyth green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [2] "Sprawling" is a wrestling technique in which a player throws his legs back, typically landing on his knees, in order to avoid having his legs grabbed by his opponent. [3] Furlow testified that Auburn High School is a member of the AHSAA. [4] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary-judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and 2003See also Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173 (Ala.2000), in which a majority of this Court adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule governing State-agent immunity. [2] "Sprawling" is a wrestling technique in which a player throws his legs back, typically landing on his knees, in order to avoid having his legs grabbed by his opponent. [3] Furlow testified that Auburn High School is a member of the AHSAA. [4] See Ex parte Coleman, 861 So.2d 1080 (Ala. 2003) (when considering a summary-judgment motion, "[t]he court must accept the tendencies of the evidence most favorable to the nonmoving party and	1	2003–2003
Ex Parte Rizk green ala · 2000 2 sentences 2001A majority of this Court later held the Cranman restatement of the rule to control the outcome in Ex parte Rizk, 791 So.2d 911 (Ala.2000), and the majority explicitly adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule in Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d 173, 177-78 (Ala.2000). 2001A majority of this Court later held the Cranman restatement of the rule to control the outcome in Ex parte Rizk , 791 So.2d 911 (Ala. 2000), and the majority explicitly adopted the Cranman restatement of the rule in Ex parte Butts , 775 So.2d 173 , 177-78 (Ala. 2000).	1	2001–2001

Statutes the citing opinions construe

USC § 42u.s.c.1983 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check