19 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2016See State v. Jones, 96 Nev. 71, 74, 605 P.2d 202, 204 (1980). 2016See State v. Jones, 96 Nev. 71, 74, 605 P.2d 202, 204 (1980). | 6 | 7 |
Larsen v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Larsen v. State, 86 Nev. 451, 456 , 470 P.2d 417, 420 (1970). 2016See Larsen v. State, 86 Nev. 451, 456 , 470 P.2d 417, 420 (1970). | 3 | 5 |
Vincze v. Stategreen2 sentences1972Furthermore, we have heretofore said: "The challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, where not made until after conviction and without a showing of prejudice, will be tested by a reduced standard, including reference to the Grand Jury transcript." Vincze v. State, 86 Nev. 546, 549 , 472 P.2d 936, 938 (1970); Logan v. Warden, 86 Nev. 511 , 471 P.2d 249 (1970). 1972Furthermore, we have heretofore said: "The challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, where not made until after conviction and without a showing of prejudice, will be tested by a reduced standard, including reference to the Grand Jury transcript." Vincze v. State, 86 Nev. 546, 549 , 472 P.2d 936, 938 (1970); Logan v. Warden, 86 Nev. 511 , 471 P.2d 249 (1970). | 3 | 3 |
United States v. Richard Stevensgreen2 sentences2000The district court followed the decision in United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380, 1404-05 (3rd Cir. 1991), which used a reduced standard when determining whether prior act evidence introduced by the defendant should be admitted. 2000However, one of Damian's particularly serious facial bruises in December 1995 evidently resulted when the dog accidentally knocked Damian into a fence post. [3] The district court followed the decision in United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380, 1404-05 (3rd Cir.1991), which used a reduced standard when determining whether prior act evidence introduced by the defendant should be admitted. | 1 | 1 |
Naomi Mizushima v. Sunset Ranch, Inc.green2 sentences1994See Mizushima v. Sunset Ranch, 103 Nev. 259, 264 , 737 P.2d 1158, 1161 (1987). 1994See Mizushima v. Sunset Ranch, 103 Nev. 259, 264 , 737 P.2d 1158, 1161 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Eighth Judicial District Courtgreen2 sentences1980See Simpson v. District Court, 88 Nev. 654 , 503 P.2d 1225 (1972). 1980See Simpson v. District Court, 88 Nev. 654 , 503 P.2d 1225 (1972). [3] In contrast with federal decisions, and the import of several earlier opinions of this court, are decisions from jurisdictions not following the rule of substantial prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. EIGHTH JUD. DIST. CT., CTY. OF CLARK, DEPT. VIgreen2 sentences1980See Simpson v. District Court, 88 Nev. 654 , 503 P.2d 1225 (1972). 1980See Simpson v. District Court, 88 Nev. 654 , 503 P.2d 1225 (1972). [3] In contrast with federal decisions, and the import of several earlier opinions of this court, are decisions from jurisdictions not following the rule of substantial prejudice. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Logan v. Warden
green
2 sentences1972Furthermore, we have heretofore said: "The challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, where not made until after conviction and without a showing of prejudice, will be tested by a reduced standard, including reference to the Grand Jury transcript." Vincze v. State, 86 Nev. 546, 549 , 472 P.2d 936, 938 (1970); Logan v. Warden, 86 Nev. 511 , 471 P.2d 249 (1970). 1972Furthermore, we have heretofore said: "The challenge to the sufficiency of the indictment, where not made until after conviction and without a showing of prejudice, will be tested by a reduced standard, including reference to the Grand Jury transcript." Vincze v. State, 86 Nev. 546, 549 , 472 P.2d 936, 938 (1970); Logan v. Warden, 86 Nev. 511 , 471 P.2d 249 (1970). | 3 | 1970–1972 |
Laney v. State
green
2 sentences1970Larsen v. State, 86 Nev. 451 , 470 P.2d 417 (1970); Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173 , 466 P.2d 666 (1970). 1970Larsen v. State, 86 Nev. 451 , 470 P.2d 417 (1970); Laney v. State, 86 Nev. 173 , 466 P.2d 666 (1970). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Collman v. State
green
2 sentences2016Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to admit this evidence. 7 °To establish voluntary manslaughter, "there must be a serious and highly provoking injury inflicted upon the person killing, sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person, or an attempt by the person killed to commit a serious personal injury on the person killing." NRS 200.050(1). 7 Griffith argues that this court should followCollman v. State, 116 Nev. 687 , 702 n.3, 7 P.3d 426 , 436 n.3 (2000), and apply a reduced standard of admissibility for a victim's bad acts. 2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Connell v. Payne
green
1 sentence1994Ct. App. 1983) (public policy demands that a reduced standard of care governs cases involving recreational sporting injuries); Connell v. Payne, 814 S.W.2d 486 (Tex. Ct. App. 1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Barren v. State
green
2 sentences1992Barren, 99 Nev. at 669 , 669 P.2d at 729-730 . 1992Barren, 99 Nev. at 669 , 669 P.2d at 729-730 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.