19 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bohanangreen2 sentences2015“When the trial judge gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” Id. (citing State v. Bohanan, 745 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Tenn. Crim. 2015“When the trial judge gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” Id. (citing State v. Bohanan, 745 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Tenn. Crim. | 8 | 8 |
State v. Inlowgreen2 sentences2015State v. Inlow, 52 S.W.3d 101, 107 (Tenn. Crim. 2014State v. Inlow, 52 S.W.3d 101, 107 (Tenn. Crim. | 6 | 6 |
State v. Forbesgreen2 sentences2013“When the trial court gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” State v. Brooks, 277 S.W.3d 407, 412 (Tenn.Crim.App.2008) (citing State v. Forbes, 918 S.W.2d 431, 447 (Tenn.Crim.App.1995)). 2010When the trial judge gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” State v. Forbes, 918 S.W.2d 431, 447 (Tenn. Crim. | 5 | 6 |
State v. Brooksgreen2 sentences2013“When the trial court gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” State v. Brooks, 277 S.W.3d 407, 412 (Tenn.Crim.App.2008) (citing State v. Forbes, 918 S.W.2d 431, 447 (Tenn.Crim.App.1995)). 2013“When the trial court gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” State v. Brooks, 277 S.W.3d 407, 412 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cozartgreen1 sentence2010App. 1995); see also State v. Cozart, 54 S.W.3d 242, 245 (Tenn. 2001) (“Denial of a special or additional instruction is error only if the trial court’s jury charge does not fully and fairly state the applicable law.”). -38- The record reflects that the trial court gave extensive jury instructions regarding self- defense that closely followed the pattern jury instruction in effect at the time of Appellant’s offense. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Teel
red
2 sentences2015“When the trial judge gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” Id. (citing State v. Bohanan, 745 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Tenn. Crim. 2015“When the trial judge gives instructions that correctly, fully, and fairly set forth the applicable law, it is not error to refuse to give a special requested instruction.” Id. (citing State v. Bohanan, 745 S.W.2d 892, 897 (Tenn. Crim. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.