Collins motion in Georgia

2014See Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 363-364 (3) ( 201 SE2d 420 ) (1973) (no error in refusing to grant mistrial where prosecutor referred to co-indictees’ right not to testify, but made no reference to appellant); Mayfield v. State, 220 Ga. App. 19, 20 (2) ( 467 SE2d 352 ) (1996) (no prejudice where appellant failed to show that evidence admitted against co-defendant was considered against him). 4.

2014See Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 363-364 (3) ( 201 SE2d 420 ) (1973) (no error in refusing to grant mistrial where prosecutor referred to co-indictees’ right not to testify, but made no reference to appellant); Mayfield v. State, 220 Ga. App. 19, 20 (2) ( 467 SE2d 352 ) (1996) (no prejudice where appellant failed to show that evidence admitted against co-defendant was considered against him). 4.

2014The trial court then denied Collins’ motion. 4 “Whether to grant a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this [c]ourt will not disturb the ruling on appeal unless it resulted from a manifest abuse of that discretion. [Cit.]” Dulcio v. State, 292 Ga. 645, 648 (2) ( 740 SE2d 574 ) (2013).

2014The trial court then denied Collins’ motion. 4 “Whether to grant a motion for a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and this [c]ourt will not disturb the ruling on appeal unless it resulted from a manifest abuse of that discretion. [Cit.]” Dulcio v. State, 292 Ga. 645, 648 (2) ( 740 SE2d 574 ) (2013).

2014See Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 363-364 (3) ( 201 SE2d 420 ) (1973) (no error in refusing to grant mistrial where prosecutor referred to co-indictees’ right not to testify, but made no reference to appellant); Mayfield v. State, 220 Ga. App. 19, 20 (2) ( 467 SE2d 352 ) (1996) (no prejudice where appellant failed to show that evidence admitted against co-defendant was considered against him). 4.

2014See Sheats v. State, 231 Ga. 362, 363-364 (3) ( 201 SE2d 420 ) (1973) (no error in refusing to grant mistrial where prosecutor referred to co-indictees’ right not to testify, but made no reference to appellant); Mayfield v. State, 220 Ga. App. 19, 20 (2) ( 467 SE2d 352 ) (1996) (no prejudice where appellant failed to show that evidence admitted against co-defendant was considered against him). 4.

2012Savannah College of Art & Design v. School of Visual Arts &c., 219 Ga. App. 296, 297 ( 464 SE2d 895 ) (1995).

2012Savannah College of Art & Design v. School of Visual Arts &c., 219 Ga. App. 296, 297 ( 464 SE2d 895 ) (1995).

2022See, e.g., Moton v. State, 332 Ga. App. 300, 302 ( 772 SE2d 393 ) (2015) (trial judge informed witness that a criminal contempt hearing would be scheduled and issued rule nisi advising the witness of the charge against him). 6 Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s denial of Collins’ motion to dismiss the State’s action for criminal contempt against her.

2022See, e.g., Moton v. State, 332 Ga. App. 300, 302 ( 772 SE2d 393 ) (2015) (trial judge informed witness that a criminal contempt hearing would be scheduled and issued rule nisi advising the witness of the charge against him). 6 Accordingly, we reverse the superior court’s denial of Collins’ motion to dismiss the State’s action for criminal contempt against her.

2021See Carter v. State, 303 Ga. App. 142, 146 (2) ( 692 SE2d 753 ) (2010) (under former version of OCGA § 24-6-609, “as long as the trial court makes express findings on this issue, even if made in an order on motion for new trial, as was done here, the intent of [the statute] is satisfied”).

2021See Carter v. State, 303 Ga. App. 142, 146 (2) ( 692 SE2d 753 ) (2010) (under former version of OCGA § 24-6-609, “as long as the trial court makes express findings on this issue, even if made in an order on motion for new trial, as was done here, the intent of [the statute] is satisfied”).

2019See generally Beck, supra at 354 ; and Land, supra at 618 . 2.

2019See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) ( 659 SE2d 875 ) (2008).

2019See Jones v. State, 290 Ga. App. 490, 494 (2) ( 659 SE2d 875 ) (2008).

2016See State v. Mills, 268 Ga. 873, 875 ( 495 SE2d 1 ) (1998). 11 The State’s argument that Collins’ motion is subject to discretionary appeal procedures because it addresses probation revocation is misplaced.

2016See State v. Mills, 268 Ga. 873, 875 ( 495 SE2d 1 ) (1998). 11 The State’s argument that Collins’ motion is subject to discretionary appeal procedures because it addresses probation revocation is misplaced.

2016See Jones v. State, 322 Ga. App. 269 ( 745 SE2d 1 ) (2013); Zamora v. State, 226 Ga. App. 105 ( 485 SE2d 214 ) (1997).

2016See Jones v. State, 322 Ga. App. 269 ( 745 SE2d 1 ) (2013); Zamora v. State, 226 Ga. App. 105 ( 485 SE2d 214 ) (1997).

2016Collins points to no law which authorizes the specific motion he filed. 7 See, e.g., State v. Green, 308 Ga. App. 33, 34 (1) ( 706 SE2d 720 ) (2011) (“[A] motion to vacate a judgment of conviction is not an established procedure for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case.”).

2016Collins points to no law which authorizes the specific motion he filed. 7 See, e.g., State v. Green, 308 Ga. App. 33, 34 (1) ( 706 SE2d 720 ) (2011) (“[A] motion to vacate a judgment of conviction is not an established procedure for challenging the validity of a judgment in a criminal case.”).

2016See also Harper, 286 Ga. at 217 (1).

2016See Shaheed v. State, 274 Ga. 716, 717 ( 559 SE2d 466 ) (2002) (“When the trial court amended [Collins’] sentence to eliminate first offender status, it effectively imposed an enhanced sentence....”).

2016See Shaheed v. State, 274 Ga. 716, 717 ( 559 SE2d 466 ) (2002) (“When the trial court amended [Collins’] sentence to eliminate first offender status, it effectively imposed an enhanced sentence....”).

2016See Davis v. State, 330 Ga. App. 711, 712 ( 769 SE2d 133 ) (2015) (“there is no magic in mere nomenclature, and pleadings are construed to serve the best interests of the pleader, and are judged by function rather than name”).

2016See Davis v. State, 330 Ga. App. 711, 712 ( 769 SE2d 133 ) (2015) (“there is no magic in mere nomenclature, and pleadings are construed to serve the best interests of the pleader, and are judged by function rather than name”).

2012Tidikis v. Network for Medical Communications &c., LLC, 274 Ga. App. 807, 812 ( 619 SE2d 481 ) (2005).

2012Tidikis v. Network for Medical Communications &c., LLC, 274 Ga. App. 807, 812 ( 619 SE2d 481 ) (2005).

2006See Devine, supra, 276 Ga. App. at 161 (trial court erred in granting motion to suppress where officers had probable cause to arrest defendant at the time they searched his person and jacket). 2.

2003See Jones v. State, 257 Ga. 753 ( 363 SE2d 529 ) (1988).

2003See Jones v. State, 257 Ga. 753 ( 363 SE2d 529 ) (1988).

2002And “an officer conducting a routine traffic stop may request and examine a driver’s license and vehicle registration and run a computer check on the documents.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Sutton v. State, 223 Ga. App. 721, 723 (1) ( 478 SE2d 910 ) (1996).

2002And “an officer conducting a routine traffic stop may request and examine a driver’s license and vehicle registration and run a computer check on the documents.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Sutton v. State, 223 Ga. App. 721, 723 (1) ( 478 SE2d 910 ) (1996).

1999Anderson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 679, 680 (1) ( 513 SE2d 235 ) (1999). 2.

1999Anderson v. State, 236 Ga. App. 679, 680 (1) ( 513 SE2d 235 ) (1999). 2.

1998Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (2); Brundage v. State, 231 Ga. App. 478, 480 (3) ( 499 SE2d 408 ) (1998).

1998Court of Appeals Rule 27 (c) (2); Brundage v. State, 231 Ga. App. 478, 480 (3) ( 499 SE2d 408 ) (1998).

1989Co. v. Parzini, 234 Ga. 868, 871 ( 218 SE2d 580 ) (1975), and whether any such defect existed at the time the die head was sold to Zarn.

1989Co. v. Parzini, 234 Ga. 868, 871 ( 218 SE2d 580 ) (1975), and whether any such defect existed at the time the die head was sold to Zarn.