18 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Citizens Organizing Project v. Department of Natural Resourcesgreen2 sentences2003In Citizens Organizing Project v. Department of Natural Resources, 189 Ill. 2d 593, 596-97 , 727 N.E.2d 195 (2000), the plaintiff requested fees in accord with the statute that said: “In any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason ***, the court shall award the party bringing the action the reasonable expenses of litigation, including attorney’s fees” (5 ILCS 100/10— 55(c) (West 1998)). 2003In Citizens Organizing Project v. Department of Natural Resources, 189 Ill. 2d 593, 596-97 , 727 N.E.2d 195 (2000), the plaintiff requested fees in accord with the statute that said: “In any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason ***, the court shall award the party bringing the action the reasonable expenses of litigation, including attorney’s fees” (5 ILCS 100/10— 55(c) (West 1998)). | 3 | 5 |
Ardt v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Ardt v. State, 292 Ill. 2000Stat. 1991, ch. 127, par. 1010 — 55(b) (now 5 ILCS 100/10 — 55(c) (West 1992)))), which provides attorney fees “[i]n any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason.” See Ardt v. State, 292 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
Town & Country Utilities, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Boardgreen1 sentence2013“The fundamental principle of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature’s intent. [Citations.] The language of the statute is the most reliable indicator of the legislature’s objectives in enacting a particular law. [Citation.] We give statutory language its plain and ordinary meaning, and, where the language is clear and unambiguous, we must apply the statute without resort to further aids of statutory construction.” Town & Country Utilities, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control Board, 225 Ill. 2d 103, 117 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation v. Rodriquez
green
2 sentences2020Rodriguez, 2012 IL 113706, ¶ 15 . 2020Section 10-55(c) states: “In any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason, including but not limited to the agency’s exceeding its statutory authority or the agency’s failure to follow statutory procedures in the adoption of the rule, the court shall award the party bringing the action the reasonable expenses of the litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees.” Id. ¶ 52 Our supreme court held that the plain language of the statute, namely reading the phrase “[i]n any case” along with “the court,” meant that the fee petition must be brought be | 3 | 2019–2020 |
People v. Woodard
green
2 sentences2011People v. Woodard, 175 Ill.2d 435, 443 , 222 Ill.Dec. 401 , 677 N.E.2d 935 (1997). 2011People v. Woodard, 175 Ill.2d 435, 443 , 222 Ill.Dec. 401 , 677 N.E.2d 935 (1997). | 2 | 2011–2011 |
County of Du Page v. Illinois Labor Relations Board, State Panel
green
2 sentences2008The appellate court opinion expressly invalidated section 1210.80(d)(2)(A) of the Board’s rules because they did not require two forms of evidence of majority support and did not require dues deduction authorization evidence. 375 Ill. 2008The appellate court opinion expressly invalidated section 1210.80(d)(2)(A) of the Board's rules because they did not require two forms of evidence of majority support and did not require dues deduction authorization evidence. 375 Ill.App.3d at 777 , 314 Ill.Dec. 409 , 874 N.E.2d 319 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences1997Plaintiff filed his petition seeking attorney fees under section 10 — 55(c) following the Illinois Supreme Court’s issuance of Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 154 Ill. 2d 138 , 607 N.E.2d 1226 (1992), aff’g 218 Ill. 1997Plaintiff filed his petition seeking attorney fees under section 10 — 55(c) following the Illinois Supreme Court’s issuance of Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 154 Ill. 2d 138 , 607 N.E.2d 1226 (1992), aff’g 218 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
Ardt v. Department of Professional Regulation
green
2 sentences1997Plaintiff filed his petition seeking attorney fees under section 10-55(c) following the Illinois Supreme Court's issuance of Ardt v. Department of Professional Regulation , 154 Ill. 2d 138 , 607 N.E.2d 1226 (1992), aff'g 218 Ill. 1997Plaintiff filed his petition seeking attorney fees under section 10 — 55(c) following the Illinois Supreme Court’s issuance of Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, 154 Ill. 2d 138 , 607 N.E.2d 1226 (1992), aff’g 218 Ill. | 2 | 1997–1997 |
First of America Trust Co. v. Armstead
neutral
1 sentence1996The appellate court determined that plaintiff was not entitled to attorney fees because the denial of plaintiffs application was not an administrative rule within the meaning of section 10 — 55(c). 269 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Washburn
green
2 sentences1992(Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Washburn (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 486 , 493 N.E.2d 1071 .) Section 14.1(b) provides: “In any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason, including but not limited to the agency’s exceeding its statutory authority or the agency’s failure to follow statutory procedures in the adoption of the rule, the court shall award the party bringing the action the reasonable expenses of the litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees.” Ill. 1992(Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Washburn (1986), 112 Ill. 2d 486 , 493 N.E.2d 1071 .) Section 14.1(b) provides: “In any case in which a party has any administrative rule invalidated by a court for any reason, including but not limited to the agency’s exceeding its statutory authority or the agency’s failure to follow statutory procedures in the adoption of the rule, the court shall award the party bringing the action the reasonable expenses of the litigation, including reasonable attorney’s fees.” Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
BD OF EDUC. v. Ill. State Bd. of Educ.
green
1 sentence1989(Board of Education v. Illinois State Board of Education (1984), 122 Ill. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.