18 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hillgreen2 sentences2020The likelihood of the sale of the property contributes to "a comprehensive market analysis to ascertain the supply and demand characteristics," which is required when determining the "highest and best use." County of Monmouth, 334 N.J. at 588 (quoting Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Twp. of Cherry Hill, 7 N.J. 2000That is to say, "`[t]he proper determination of highest and best use requires a comprehensive market analysis to ascertain the supply and demand characteristics of alternative uses.'" Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Tp., 7 N.J.Tax 120, 131 (Tax 1984), aff'd, 8 N.J.Tax 334 (App.Div.1986) ( quoting Barret, "A Restatement of Highest and Best Use," Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, November December 1979 at 8). | 13 | 13 |
Clemente v. Township of South Hackensackgreen2 sentences2026"The proper determination of highest and best use requires a comprehensive market analysis to ascertain the supply and demand characteristics of alternative uses." Clemente, 27 N.J. 2022“The proper determination of highest and best use requires a comprehensive market analysis to ascertain the supply and demand characteristics of alternative uses.” Clemente, 27 N.J. | 1 | 6 |
Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hillgreen2 sentences2013See Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Township of Cherry Hill, 7 N.J.Tax 120, 131 (Tax 1984), aff'd, 8 N.J.Tax 334 (App.Div.1986). 2000That is to say, "`[t]he proper determination of highest and best use requires a comprehensive market analysis to ascertain the supply and demand characteristics of alternative uses.'" Six Cherry Hill, Inc. v. Cherry Hill Tp., 7 N.J.Tax 120, 131 (Tax 1984), aff'd, 8 N.J.Tax 334 (App.Div.1986) ( quoting Barret, "A Restatement of Highest and Best Use," Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, November December 1979 at 8). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.