Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
618 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2026 76 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carruthersgreen2 sentences2026State v. Carruthers, 35 S.W.3d 516, 557-58 (Tenn. 2000) (citations omitted). 1. 2026State v. Carruthers, 35 S.W.3d 516, 557-58 (Tenn. 2000). 5 As charged here, rape of a child is the “unlawful sexual penetration of a victim by the defendant or the defendant by a victim, if the victim is more than three (3) years of age but less than thirteen (13) years of age.” T.C.A. § 39-13-522 (2019). | 387 | 396 |
State v. Evansgreen2 sentences2025Id. 2015Id. | 57 | 155 |
State v. Graceyellow2 sentences2010Moreover, a verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt on appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W. 2d 474, 476 (Tenn. 1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn. Crim. 2010State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 836 (Tenn. 1978). 5 Moreover, a verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt on appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W. 2d 474, 476 (Tenn. 1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn. Crim. | 39 | 55 |
Anglin v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Moreover, a verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt on appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W. 2d 474, 476 (Tenn. 1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn. Crim. 2010State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 836 (Tenn. 1978). 5 Moreover, a verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt on appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W. 2d 474, 476 (Tenn. 1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn. Crim. | 23 | 23 |
State v. Browngreen2 sentences2002App. 1977), which the defendant has the burden of overcoming, State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn. 1977). 2002App. 1977), which the defendant has the burden of overcoming, State v. Brown, 551 S.W.2d 329, 331 (Tenn. 1977). | 20 | 21 |
State v. Tugglegreen2 sentences2004State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). (a) Especially Aggravated Robbery. 2004State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). | 10 | 10 |
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences1996State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 569 (Tenn. 1993). 1995State v. Smith, 868 S.W.2d 561, 568-69 (Tenn.1993), petition for cert. filed (Apr. 4, 1994) (citations omitted). | 3 | 3 |
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences1988Williams v. State, 552 S.W.2d 772, 776 (Tenn.Crim.App.1977). 1986A verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt upon appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W.2d 474, 476 (Tenn.1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn.Crim.App.1977); Williams v. State, 552 S.W.2d 772, 776 (Tenn.Crim.App.1977), which the defendant has the burden of overcoming. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Cabbagered1 sentence2010State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 836 (Tenn. 1978). 5 Moreover, a verdict against the defendant removes the presumption of innocence and raises a presumption of guilt on appeal, State v. Grace, 493 S.W. 2d 474, 476 (Tenn. 1973); Anglin v. State, 553 S.W.2d 616, 620 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bishop v. Stategreen1 sentence2008State v. Carruthers, 35 S.W.3d 516, 557-58 (Tenn. 2000). 14 “‘Circumstantial evidence’ differs from direct evidence, and consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be deduced according to reason and common experience of mankind.” Webb v. State, 203 S.W. 955 , 955 (Tenn. 1918); accord Bishop v. State, 287 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1956). | 1 | 1 |
Pennington v. Stategreen1 sentence1989Pennington v. State, 573 S.W.2d 755, 757 (Tenn.Crim.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Liakas v. State
green
2 sentences2010Id. 2003Id. | 2 | 2003–2010 |
Webb v. State
neutral
1 sentence2008State v. Carruthers, 35 S.W.3d 516, 557-58 (Tenn. 2000). 14 “‘Circumstantial evidence’ differs from direct evidence, and consists of proof of collateral facts and circumstances from which the existence of the main fact may be deduced according to reason and common experience of mankind.” Webb v. State, 203 S.W. 955 , 955 (Tenn. 1918); accord Bishop v. State, 287 S.W.2d 49, 50 (Tenn. 1956). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Harris
green
1 sentence1994Id. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.