neutral explanation challenge in Nevada

17 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ford v. Stategreen nev · 2006 · cited in 15 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2011–2020 2 sentences 2016Then, "the production burden. . . shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge," id., that is "clear and reasonably specific," Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2016Then, "the production burden. . . shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge," id., that is "clear and reasonably specific," Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 (internal quotation marks omitted).	8	15
Purkett v. Elemgreen scotus · 1995 · cited in 7 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2016 2 sentences 2016Then, "the production burden. . . shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge," id., that is "clear and reasonably specific," Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2016Then, "the production burden. . . shifts to the proponent of the challenge to assert a neutral explanation for the challenge," id., that is "clear and reasonably specific," Purkett, 514 U.S. at 768 (internal quotation marks omitted).	7	7
Johnson v. Californiagreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 3 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015 2 sentences 2015Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 (1995). "[Al defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson's first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred." Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 (2005); see also Watson v. State, 130 Nev., Adv. 2015Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 (1995). "[Al defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson's first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred." Johnson v. California, 545 U.S. 162, 170 (2005); see also Watson v. State, 130 Nev., Adv.	3	3

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.602 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.380 (4) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.021 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.051 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.061 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 175.201 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 177.055 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.415 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.030 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.481 (3) NV § Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.045 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NV 17 (2011–2020) LA 4 (1992–2014) MI 4 (2005–2019) TX 4 (2003–2004) CA 3 (1991–2016) FL 3 (2006–2008) IN 2 (1990–1994) GA 2 (2013–2013)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check