tightly timed process claim in New York

2015To be sure, a "core and essential objective" of the no-fault structure "is[] to provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment" (Presbyterian Hosp., 90 NY2d at 281 ), and the preclusion doctrine provides an incentive for insurers to comply with the regulatory time frame.

2015To be sure, a “core and essential objective” of the no-fault structure “is ... to provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment” (Presbyterian Hosp., 90 NY2d at 281 ), and the preclusion doctrine provides an incentive for insurers to comply with the regulatory time frame.

2013Such a penalty is still a “drastic” one (Zakhidov v Boulevard Tenants Corp., 96 AD3d 737, 739 [2012]), and is sufficient to protect the policy interest of promoting “ ‘a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment’ ” (Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop.

2013Such a penalty is still a “drastic” one (Zakhidov v Boulevard Tenants Corp., 96 AD3d 737, 739 [2012]), and is sufficient to protect the policy interest of promoting “ ‘a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment’ ” (Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop.

2014Since the core objective of the no-fault regulations is to “provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment” (Hospital for Joint Diseases, 9 NY3d at 319-320 ), it begs all reason to adopt respondent’s position that a regulation which generically permits the receipt of “notices of claim” by telephone does not apply to the specific forms that an assignor must file in order to be eligible for no-fault benefits—the notice of accident and proof of claim.

2012Co., 9 NY3d 312, 317 [2007].) The core objective of the no-fault scheme is to “provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment.” (Hospital for Joint Diseases at 319 .) Therefore, an insurer’s failure to pay or deny a claim within the requisite time period of 30 days “carries significant consequences, including the payment of attorneys’ fees and interest.” (LMK Psychological Servs., P.C., 12 NY3d at 222; Hospital for Joint Diseases at 317 .) Insurance Law § 5106 (a) provides that first-party benefits are overdue “if not paid within thirty days after the claimant supplies proof

2014Aside from the core objective of “providing] a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment” (see LMK Psychological Servs., P.C., 12 NY3d at 222 ), another important goal of the no-fault laws was also to “reduce the burden on the courts” (see Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop.

2012Co., 9 NY3d 312, 317 [2007].) The core objective of the no-fault scheme is to “provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment.” (Hospital for Joint Diseases at 319 .) Therefore, an insurer’s failure to pay or deny a claim within the requisite time period of 30 days “carries significant consequences, including the payment of attorneys’ fees and interest.” (LMK Psychological Servs., P.C., 12 NY3d at 222; Hospital for Joint Diseases at 317 .) Insurance Law § 5106 (a) provides that first-party benefits are overdue “if not paid within thirty days after the claimant supplies proof

2012(Statutes § 97; see Matter of Jude F., 291 AD2d 165, 170 [2d Dept 2002].) The “core objective” of the no-fault automobile insurance system was “to provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment.” (LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. at 222, citing Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop.

2009Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 225 [1986]) and would frustrate one of the main purposes of the regulatory scheme, which is “to provide a tightly timed process of claim, disputation and payment” (Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas.